This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Respiratory tract article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Fraireedelafuente.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 03:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
What is the difference between respiratory tract and respiratory system? --I-user (talk) 18:37, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
As per gastrointestinal tract, it is logical to display these three articles (Upper, Lower and Respiratory tract) on the same page. I propose this merge because:
This merge has been done. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:33, 28 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
This article could easily be integrated within 'respiratory tract' whilst providing readers a much greater amount of content, context and quality-written anatomical descriptions. "Respiratory tree" could be integrated as a single paragraph or less, and does not need its separate article LT910001 (talk) 11:11, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
This merge has been done. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:33, 28 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
The content in airway should be merged here and then airway should become a disambiguation page. There is hardly any content in airway now. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:32, 28 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Where is the source that says human lungs contain up to 28 generations (dichotomous branching)? From what I have learned (as an anaesthetist) and looked up on the internet, 23 generations are the most commonly quoted figure. Furthermore in my opinion, quoting "up to" is not as helpful as the "average".Senaiboy (talk) 15:56, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
This could readily be merged with 'respiratory tree' for greater readability and access. LT910001 (talk) 01:48, 7 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
This merge has been done. Iztwoz (talk) 07:12, 18 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Since Lung is divided into Human lung and Lung, have suggested on Respiratory system talk page, a separate page for human respiratory system which I think could be new home for Respiratory tract - there is a lot of duplicate material and think Respiratory system is more likely to be looked up than respiratory tract. Iztwoz (talk) 11:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Small stub better presented on target page where already mentioned Iztwoz (talk) 20:41, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Small stub better presented on target page where already mentioned Iztwoz (talk) 20:43, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Respiratory tract. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:36, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply