This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This is the best wiki page on reverence (as it pertains to the emotive essence of it). Putting the grand epistemological implications aside (which are genius), the author of this article has a metaphysical connotation which denotes a sense of completing this class project last minute. The writing style makes me very aware that this article uses two sources and the rest is made up in a last-ditch effort to make a passable grade in the last semester of undergraduate degree.
129.15.127.122 (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The opening few lines about religion seem almost arbitrary and lack any kind of citation. Clearly religious reverence should be discussed in the article, but should it open the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.230.145.240 (talk) 17:39, 21 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This just isn't encyclopedic - it's more like an essay where someone summarizes a few obscure works. What exists needs to be condensed, and most of the article rewritten. Considering that the talk page is dead, there isn't a lot of activity on this. Qxu21 (talk) 04:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
