Home  

Random  

Nearby  



Log in  



Settings  



Donate  



About Wikipedia  

Disclaimers  



Wikipedia





Talk:Romblon





Article  

Talk  



Language  

Watch  

Edit  


Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)
 


Learn more about this page

WikiProject Philippine LGUs

edit

Wondering how to edit the article? The WikiProject Philippine LGUs could be of help. :)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ph seal romblon.png

edit
 

Image:Ph seal romblon.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.


Save_Us_229 19:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Romblon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Need help in copyediting and reviewing

edit

Dear Sainsf (talk · contribs), after the successful elevation to GA status of the Banton, Romblon article, I am thinking of nominating this article for GA status. Before I nominate the article though, I would like you and other Wikipedia editors, such as Wtmitchell (talk · contribs) and Namayan (talk · contribs) to review the article so I can do cleanup and copyediting. Looking forward to your help in this article just as in Banton. Thanks! — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 08:02, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

This is great work, you might want to consider this instead for your language section: https://psa.gov.ph/content/romblon-population-expected-double-41-years -- Namayan (talk) 09:29, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
—Will look into this. Thanks, Namayan! — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 03:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Lawrence ruiz This is an awesome article. I feel you should nominate it, I would love to take up the review and add my comments there itself. If we do it all here then it would be same as a peer review, unofficially. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 10:09, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
—Okay, Sainsf. I just nominated the article. Looking forward to your review. Thanks! — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 11:02, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Lawrence ruiz Thank you. I am busy nowadays, will try to find time for a complete review in the next week. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 11:07, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Comments on the lead

edit
  1. It would be better to add another paragraph or two to give a concise summary of the article. See WP:LEAD for guidance.
  2. "archipelago province" should be "archipelagic province". Yes "archipelagic" is a word.
  3. There should be a comma after "Tablas".
  4. You mentioned "Mindoro" as an island, but then mention "Aklan and Capiz". I suggest saying "Panay" instead.
seav (talk) 19:10, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
—Will work on these comments as soon as I have free time. Thanks, Seav! — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 03:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Romblon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:29, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Romblon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 11:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply


Taken, as promised. :) Sainsf <^>Feel at home 11:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lead

edit

Etymology

edit

Early history

edit

Spanish period

edit

Revolutionary period

edit
Please add the appropriate source to the end of the line. As of now it looks unsourced. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 10:13, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

American period

edit

Japanese period

edit

Modern period

edit

Geography

edit

Demographics

edit
Has this been done? Sainsf <^>Feel at home 07:29, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Economy

edit

Tourism

edit

Government

edit

Infrastructure

edit

Education

edit

Suggestion: Not a must for GA status and not a deficiency, but a copyedit would be in order if you wish to develop the article further.

@Lawrence ruiz: That should be all. You there? Sainsf <^>Feel at home 09:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, Sainsf. I was just busy with work these past few weeks, but I will apply these changes and suggestions soon. Thank you. — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 09:04, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Lawrence ruiz: I am sorry but if there's been no activity here since 6 days. The review can't go on for long without any response. If there is no activity from your side on this in the next 3 days, I will be forced to fail this nomination. If you are busy, it would be better to fix these issues and renominate this when you have more time. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 04:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Sainsf: Hi, actually Sanglahi86 already applied the changes to the article based on your recommendations, and I also made a few revisions myself just now. Just ping me if you still found glaring mistakes after your review. Thanks for your patience. — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 05:50, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Sanglahi86: and @Lawrence ruiz: Thanks for all the changes, did not notice them as the article was not on my watchlist. There are a few issues remaining, I am striking out the resolved ones.
  • Please fix these dablinks.
  • Duplinks are still prominent.
  • I feel we should improve the lead a bit further; at the moment it seems to be focusing a bit too much on the history of the island, it should reflect most of the important aspects of the article. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 06:58, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
I answered some of your questions, Sainsf. I am currently at work so I can't proofread and copyedit extensively. Thanks. — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 09:52, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Alright, just keep responding regularly so that this review does not have to be closed due to inactivity. Thanks. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 10:08, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Lawrence ruiz: Any more improvements? We have not worked here since 3 days... Sainsf <^>Feel at home 11:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Sainsf: Hi! I expanded the lead and added more info in it, as well as spelled out the percent signs on the text (except for those that are part of data tables). I don't know how to use the tool though for removing duplinks. — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 04:16, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Lawrence ruiz: Thanks for the fixes, but I am afraid I am far too busy to fix such a large number of duplinks myself. I would suggest you to take your time understanding how the tool works; it is really very simple, just read the instructions on the page and sweep out those extra links. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 04:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Sainsf: Hello again! I've removed the duplinks using the tool you provided. Big help! Thanks! — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 06:06, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Lawrence ruiz: Great! Just one issue more, you expanded the lead but forgot adding links. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 08:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Sainsf: Hello again! Links have been provided in the lead. — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 09:25, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Lawrence ruiz: Very well, this article is promoted! Cheers, Sainsf <^>Feel at home 09:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Sainsf: Thank you so much for the review and suggestions! The province of Romblon owes you a lot! — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 09:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Lawrence ruiz: I am overwhelmed!   Sainsf <^>Feel at home 09:42, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Romblon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:34, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


Add topic

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Romblon&oldid=1202345567"
 



Last edited on 2 February 2024, at 14:59  


Languages

 



This page is not available in other languages.
 

Wikipedia


This page was last edited on 2 February 2024, at 14:59 (UTC).

Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Terms of Use

Desktop