This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[Legislative districts of Parañaque#2nd District|Second District]] The anchor (#2nd District) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image:Ph seal romblon.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Romblon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Latest comment: 8 years ago8 comments4 people in discussion
Dear Sainsf (talk·contribs), after the successful elevation to GA status of the Banton, Romblon article, I am thinking of nominating this article for GA status. Before I nominate the article though, I would like you and other Wikipedia editors, such as Wtmitchell (talk·contribs) and Namayan (talk·contribs) to review the article so I can do cleanup and copyediting. Looking forward to your help in this article just as in Banton. Thanks! — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 08:02, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
—Lawrence ruiz This is an awesome article. I feel you should nominate it, I would love to take up the review and add my comments there itself. If we do it all here then it would be same as a peer review, unofficially. Sainsf<^>Feel at home10:09, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Romblon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Spanish chronicler Miguel de Loarca Don't introduce him again. Just say de Loarca
Who is a Recollect missionary? Link or explain
Link Catholic
they sestablished typo?
Duplink: Mindoro, Arevalo
Link Asi and Onhan
Any link possible for Sibuyanon style of Romblomanon? — Currently, there is no article for that because it's not a language but a linguistic style.— Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 09:52, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
sub-province administered "sub-provinces" — A commandancia is a sub-province in Spanish
The Caviteño Mariano Riego de Dios and his forces liberated Romblon, while Ananias Diocno and Leandro Fullon proceeded to Panay. Who are these people?
On July 25 of the same year "of" not needed
a total amount of P22,765.21 What is P?
What is a barrio? Link or explain
However, Molo’s term was a brief transition to another era as the Americans arrived in the province a few months later. Source? — Reyes, 1995 — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 09:52, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
There are numerous duplinks in this section and the subsections. I will not point them out from now, I will rather suggest using this tool yourself to detect duplinks and remove them in the article.
Link archipelago
17 minor and small islands. What is the difference between minor and small?
1,533.45 square kilometres (153,345 ha) Better convert to sq. mi
about 5.30% No "0" needed
It is generally mountainous with about 40% of its land area having slopes greater than 50% Could not understand this
500 meters (1,640) feet) extra bracket
The major locations of areas that are highly productive and buildable are basically in Tablas and Sibuyan. "locations of" is redundant
These maybe found in Odiongan, San Andres, Looc and Santa Fe in Tablas Island "These maybe found" --> "These include"
Agriculture is the main industry in the province Say "in Romblon", we are starting a new section
Coconut is the number one crop "the most cultivated" is better than "number one"
58,270.44 hectares. Convert to sqmi
'Rice is the next crop being produced "...crop, cultivated in..."
and correspondingly, with the highest volume of production Why "correspondingly"? Does the use of this type of crops ensure a large volume? BTW it should read "have" not "with". — The first part of sentence indicates that the towns mentioned have the greatest areas planted with root crops, hence, their production volume is highest in the province. — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 09:52, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
is surrounded by bodies of water "by water on all sides" is better
a total length of 311.046 kilometers. Provincial roads, meanwhile, total 239.005 kilomters in length The second "km" is a typo, use convert templates please
Barangay Azagra, San Fernando, Sibuyan Island No "and" before Sibuyan?
It is composed of 13 districts, where there are 228 elementary schools, 216 of which are public and 12 are private Why are districts combined with schools in this line? The "13 districts" part should be in the section Administrative divisions. — In the Philippines, school districts are different from administrative divisions of a municipality or town. — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 09:52, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Sta.Fe, "Sta. Fe"?
Suggestion: Not a must for GA status and not a deficiency, but a copyedit would be in order if you wish to develop the article further.
@Lawrence ruiz: I am sorry but if there's been no activity here since 6 days. The review can't go on for long without any response. If there is no activity from your side on this in the next 3 days, I will be forced to fail this nomination. If you are busy, it would be better to fix these issues and renominate this when you have more time. Sainsf<^>Feel at home04:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Sainsf: Hi, actually Sanglahi86 already applied the changes to the article based on your recommendations, and I also made a few revisions myself just now. Just ping me if you still found glaring mistakes after your review. Thanks for your patience. — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 05:50, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Sanglahi86: and @Lawrence ruiz: Thanks for all the changes, did not notice them as the article was not on my watchlist. There are a few issues remaining, I am striking out the resolved ones.
I feel we should improve the lead a bit further; at the moment it seems to be focusing a bit too much on the history of the island, it should reflect most of the important aspects of the article. Sainsf<^>Feel at home06:58, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Sainsf: Hi! I expanded the lead and added more info in it, as well as spelled out the percent signs on the text (except for those that are part of data tables). I don't know how to use the tool though for removing duplinks. — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 04:16, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Lawrence ruiz: Thanks for the fixes, but I am afraid I am far too busy to fix such a large number of duplinks myself. I would suggest you to take your time understanding how the tool works; it is really very simple, just read the instructions on the page and sweep out those extra links. Sainsf<^>Feel at home04:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Romblon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.