This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Ugg...was this translated from German with Google translate and then just plugged in with no editing? At points it actively doesn't make sense. john k (talk) 20:26, 8 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Indeed, whoever wrote the article used some horrendous grammar. I took me over an hour (that much work) to clean it up as much as possible, in which I think I succeeded, so the article should at least now be an improvement vis-à-vis the previous mangled versions -- fdewaele, 15 November 2011, 16:48 CET.
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
229.000 dead out of 750.000 mobilized ? That means, Saxon loss ratio was twice the overall german (?) (~some 2 Million out of 13 million). Seems, ehm, dubious, hard to believe. Is that claim confirmed or comprehensible, in any way ? - Thanks. --Oenie (talk) 08:08, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
based on harsh addition-failures. Real number was around ~140.000 (see German article for discussion). --129.187.244.19 (talk) 08:16, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
