 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Unfortunately I find that the article fails to mention how the project plans to meet its renewable energy claims. There is some mention of what appears to be resources exploitation and mining, but I fail to see how this could be considered sustainable, the way it is presented. If on the other hand the name of the project is considered to mislead, there also lacks some criticism on this aspect. 76.10.128.192 (talk) 03:34, 7 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Sarawak Corridor of Renewable Energy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
