![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Q: Can't people consider Explorer to be among the shuttle fleet instead of a fake? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.151.77 (talk • contribs) —Preceding undated comment added 19:58, 26 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Q: What year was Explorer built? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.151.77 (talk • contribs) 21:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
The Shuttle Explorer article should be labled as a stub. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.151.77 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
I removed the section on a possible name change as it was speculation, the references were simple news articles that didn't mention the shuttle by name. They made no reference to a name change. And one actually did refer to the space shuttle as "Explorer". If you want to add this section back in provide more that speculation based on pictures and news reports. An official announcement by NASA or the current owner would be the only thing I consider acceptable. Lotu (talk) 00:08, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Space Shuttle Independence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply