Home  

Random  

Nearby  



Log in  



Settings  



Donate  



About Wikipedia  

Disclaimers  



Wikipedia





Talk:Tenebrae responsories





Article  

Talk  



Language  

Watch  

Edit  


Latest comment: 3 years ago by Sparafucil in topic Scope and renaming
 


Learn more about this page

Removed because not a prominent example?

edit

Francis, I regret that you have removed my edit "Motet by Franz Joseph Aumann; accompaniment by three trombones added by Bruckner in 1879" because "possible, but doesn't seem like a prominent example (compare Poulenc's: these are described in a separate article, linked higher on the page".

I find it not a good reason for removing an addition, which links to two other wiki pages (Franz Joseph Aumann and Anton Bruckner).

As written op Aumann's pagina, "Aumann's music was a large part of the repertoire at St. Florian in the 19th century, and Anton Bruckner availed himself of this resource for his studies of counterpoint. Bruckner focused a lot of his attention on Aumann's Christmas responsories and an Ave Maria in D major. Bruckner, who liked Aumann's coloured harmony, added in 1879 an accompaniment by three trombones to his "Ecce quomodo" and "Tenebrae"", with references of Bruckner's scholar Paul Hawkshaw and the Bruckner's Handbook. Moreover, it is cited in Bruckner's discography.

Please remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a document based on personal meanings or choices. I would thus suggest you to restore my edit.

--Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 09:12, 26 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nothing personal. It didn't even have a reference. See also the WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE policy. --Francis Schonken (talk) 09:26, 26 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Corinthians

edit

"The readings of the third nocturn of Maundy Thursday are 1 Corinthians 2:17−22, 2:23−26, 2:27−34"

Is this a misprint? There are no verses by these numbers in the 2nd chapter of 1st Corinthians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:1514:54:C814:CAF2:C80F:4F06 (talk) 18:16, 2 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Scope and renaming

edit

This page, started as a redirect to Responsory#Responsories for Holy Week, now opens with a very questionable definition and confusing discussion of "Holy Week". Historically as well as at present Holy Week has included Palm Sunday as well as Mon-Wed, and the 'days of Tenebrae' have their daytime offices. New Grove (under "Responsory") uses "Tenebrae responsories" in discussing the polyphonic genre, which seems the actual subject. Sparafucil (talk) 04:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


Add topic

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tenebrae_responsories&oldid=1201154761"
 



Last edited on 31 January 2024, at 01:34  


Languages

 



This page is not available in other languages.
 

Wikipedia


This page was last edited on 31 January 2024, at 01:34 (UTC).

Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Terms of Use

Desktop