Talk:Used book

Should the unreferenced article Reading copy be merged into this article? There seems to be too little content in each to have two separae articles. Edison 05:52, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Support. Reading copy is little more than a dicdef and it's difficult to see how it could ever be more. Barnabypage 12:59, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Support Reading copy definitely falls under used book and has no reason to be its own article. Boccobrock 21:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Send both to Wiktionary. This page boils down to "A used book is a book which has been used and can be found in a used bookstore." They are both rather self-evident definitions, not encyclopedia topics. Replace the pages with a soft-redirect to the appropriate Wiktionary page. Rossami (talk) 16:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

There is a great deal more that could go on this page, though, while that doesn't strike me as true of reading copy. Barnabypage (talk) 13:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Reply