Template talk:Metrolink (California) lines

While I think having future connections shown is important (like Pomona North Metro in 2025), I think it's best to limit them to projects that are actually under construction (i.e. removing those that are "planned" like Claremont Metro). Otherwise, the CAHSR and Brightline tags are looking at nearly a decade of being displayed with "planned" being there - just sort of taking up space without firm dates. -MJ (talk) 04:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

You make a good point! I just wasn’t sure what to or what not to include in terms of future projects, haha. But yes, please feel free to make any changes as you see fit. —OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 07:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Since Commerce station isn’t on a straight segment on this template, I don’t know how to show it as limited service. If that’s possible, I’d greatly appreciate it if someone could help out. Thank you! -—OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 07:33, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Looking at its service pattern, I think an   (HST) icon suits it just fine. But I did some looking and there is a   (pHST3) icon if you insist, although there isn't one for   (v-STR3) so it would call for a realignment.

Personally, I say we leave it since it has service five days a week, unlike the other three stations that use the limited service icon. Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 13:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply