I might be what you call an "inclusionist." I don't like to see information deleted. If something is to be removed, then I think it should at least be considered how to explain it differently. As much as I hate commercial pollution of Wikipedia, you can still use language to make it clear that it may not be "encyclopedic," in nature. I believe leaving even the undesirable content in Wikipedia (as long as its explained in such way) can be encyclopedic, in and of itself. Having said that, though, I don't particularly like the idea of this whole "deletionist vs. inclusionist" mentality... editing wars suck.
