The "Wildlife of [Country]" articles have no standardisation, seemingly only Asian countries have them while outside of asia countries have Fauna/Flora of.. articles ("Wildlife of.." redirecting to "Fauna of.."), some asian countries only have Fauna/Flora articles and no Wildlife articles. Those who have both often have duplication. Most of the "Wildlife of.." articles are quite poor and are not much more than lists, they are also all very different. Some "Fauna of.." articles however have been featured i.e. Fauna of Scotland and Fauna of Australia, so I think it's probable the best solution would be to simply make Fauna/Flora articles for asian countries and remove the "Wildlife of.." articles, although they serve a decent purpose and it'd be a shame to delete all of that. I would like some comments on this if possible. KimiNewt (talk) 22:24, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
-- Sandbox --
caw caw Pkmugg (talk) 00:06, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
