يوسف قناوة

  Hello, I'm Path slopu. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edittoPhocas—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. PATH SLOPU 03:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this editto1340s—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:26, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to SPLA, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello.

The correct elaboration of SPLA in the first meaning is Sahrawi People's Liberation Army. It also redirected to the main page, instead of a subarticle. I apologize for any inconvenience caused. يوسف قناوة (talk) 09:32, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ah, I see, now that I have clicked on the links. I will restore your version. I apologise for reverting a valid edit, but that is why you need to use edit summaries. Other editors are likely to revert if no explanation is given, especially if we don't know the editor and don't have time to investigate the change. If you had just written a short reason, such as "target the article page instead of section" or something like that, I would have known! Thanks for following up though. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Algeria–China relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Li Jian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello يوسف قناوة! Your additions to Constitutional Council (Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• Ifyou own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:03, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm SKAG123. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2023 Marrakesh-Safi earthquake without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SKAG123 (talk) 19:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello @SKAG123

I removed a redundant phrase that was already present elsewhere in the article. Please don't be in a haste to check my edit and undo it. يوسف قناوة (talk) 19:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please use an edit summary next time. SKAG123 (talk) 20:52, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@SKAG123 In case you find none, consider taking some time to check the edit rather than urgently undoing it. يوسف قناوة (talk) 21:17, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of adjectival and demonymic forms for countries and nations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sahrawi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much for your work so far! I wonder if you could create the pending Timeline of the Western Saharan clashes (2020–present) article to list the daily developments of the war so far instead of the section currently used in the article + further analysis on the main article itself. I can help with further research on Sahrawi sources in both Arabic and Spanish if needed! Tidjani Saleh (talk) 21:33, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I really appreciate it, @Tidjani. ☺️

I had long received no response to my proposal; nonetheless, I decided to occasionally gather some of the attacks carried out by the SPLA, depending on daily military communiqués published on SPS and elsewhere. By looking at the somewhat inadequacy of the information therein, I deduced that it would be better to handle them by sorting them chronologically on a table that mainly consists of the date and location of each attack, with additional notes if available. I saved my progress so far on a text file, and I would publish the work on a draft as soon as possible.

However, I assume this will lead to WP:UNDUE, since Morocco has yet published any patent statement regarding this conflict (it rather de facto denies it, despite confirmations from UN reports S/2023/729 and S/2022/733). To that end, the article will be mainly centred on the Sahrawi attacks at this point in time. يوسف قناوة (talk) 23:33, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hey @يوسف قناوة, thanks for your quick answer!

I think that sources prove that Morocco does acknowledge some attacks (or at least Moroccan press, such as Le Desk's analysis of the strike and Hespress's celebration of the murder of Sahrawi generals), and that the SPLA's reports are still an important source on the conflict even if Morocco denies or ignores most attacks (which can be clarified on the lead of the article).

As per the article, I'd follow the structure used for the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the 2023 Israel–Hamas war's timelines + I'd personally split them in two articles: 13 November 2020-28 October 2023 and 28 October 2023-present as per the current developments on Smara and the announced escalation by the SPLA. Tidjani Saleh (talk) 23:48, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I would be greatly honoured to cooperate in order to cover this ongoing armed conflict that marks the continuation of the 1975–1991 Western Sahara War. Hitherto, there's 908 communiqués released from the SADR MoD since November 13, 2020, concerning the war, so it might take some effort to build the article. While the casualty statistics of the war are ostensibly classified, I think it may be preferable not to rely on any other source (such as ACLED Dashboard) until an official statement is made regarding the matter. يوسف قناوة (talk) 02:00, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply