This is so interesting. I had no idea! Thanks for adding it. Marquardtika (talk) 02:44, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Sure, the early-to-mid-20th-century South Carolina U.S. Senate elections were just foregone conclusions, based on the Democratic primaries, but I think the infoboxes for the primaries should be kept in that section. —GoldRingChip 21:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for starting on the expansion of Harry Harper last week. I had that article on my watchlist and finished getting the article to a five-fold expansion. I've nominated the article for WP:DYK. See the nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Harry Harper and propose any hook changes that you like. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:47, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
On1 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Harry Harper, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Harry Harper refused to play baseball on Sundays? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Harry Harper. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Harry Harper), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Re: this edit. Lloyd George was NOT admitted to the bar. He was a solicitor not a barrister. DuncanHill (talk) 01:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Seeing that you made convention maps for the republican primary articles, and I just want to say that that's a great addition. Keep up the good work. GeorgeBailey (talk) 23:00, 23 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
|
The Original Barnstar |
| 1896 Texas gubernatorial election is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:04, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply |
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| 1906 Texas gubernatorial election is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:49, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply |
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1986 Arizona gubernatorial election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Alben W. Barkley into 1926 United States Senate election in Kentucky. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi. I appreciate your work creating and expanding election articles, but please don't rely on OurCampaigns. OurCampaigns is a wiki and not considered a reliable source. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have nominated 1880 Republican National Convention for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 18:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply