Home  

Random  

Nearby  



Log in  



Settings  



Donate  



About Wikipedia  

Disclaimers  



Wikipedia





Alexikoua


Joined 10 September 2008
 


User page  

Talk  



Watch  

View history  

Contributions  

Edit  


 

Languages  

What links here  

User logs  

View user groups  

Permanent link  

Page information  

Edit full page  

Download QR code  





Latest comment: 2 months ago by Jtrrs0 in topic Markos Botsaris has an RfC
 


Learn more about this page

To leave me a new message please click here.


  • 2 DYK for Poliçan, Gjirokastër
  • 3 DYK for Massacre of Phocaea
  • 4 DYK for Eritha
  • 5 DYK for Kyra Vassiliki
  • 6 DYK for Dormition of the Theotokos Church, Labovë e Kryqit
  • 7 DYK for Military of Mycenaean Greece
  • 8 DYK for Mycenaean Greece
  • 9 Your GA nomination of Northern Epirote Declaration of Independence
  • 10 DYK for Manthos Papagiannis
  • 11 DYK for Lyngiades massacre
  • 12 DYK for Samsun deportations
  • 13 DYK for Candia massacre
  • 14 DYK for Evacuation of Ayvalik
  • 15 DYK for Petros Lantzas
  • 16 Byzantine Greeks
  • 17 DYK for Pavlos Kouroupis
  • 18 Disambiguation link notification for September 11
  • 19 Disambiguation link notification for October 3
  • 20 ArbCom 2019 election voter message
  • 21 Sarandaporo Medal Scan Copyright Status
  • 22 Eleni Foureira
  • 23 Φουρέιρα
  • 24 DYK nomination of Forty Saints Monastery, Sarandë
  • 25 Disambiguation link notification for April 19
  • 26 DYK for Forty Saints Monastery, Sarandë
  • 27 Disambiguation link notification for May 16
  • 28 Thessalian Buas
  • 29 Disambiguation link notification for June 3
  • 30 Reverting of my edits to Markos Botsaris article
  • 31 Notification
  • 32 Disambiguation link notification for August 10
  • 33 Greek revolt of 1567–1572
  • 34 Disambiguation link notification for September 1
  • 35 Disambiguation link notification for October 21
  • 36 Talk Page: Vlorë
  • 37 Disambiguation link notification for October 30
  • 38 A barnstar for you!
  • 39 DYK for Expulsion of Istanbul Greeks
  • 40 Important Notice
  • 41 Improper synthesis
  • 42 ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
  • 43 Apollonia (Illyria)
  • 44 Removals
  • 45 Ahem
  • 46 Disambiguation link notification for January 23
  • 47 Warning
  • 48 Disambiguation link notification for February 17
  • 49 February 2021
  • 50 About a DYK you reviewed
  • 51 Disambiguation link notification for April 5
  • 52 MOS
  • 53 Hormova
  • 54 Xlibris
  • 55 Article "Refugees of the Greek Civil War"
  • 56 October 2021
  • 57 Gjirokastër
  • 58 Eleni Foureira birth name
  • 59 Orphaned non-free image File:Omonoia logo.jpg
  • 60 Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
  • 61 A favour
  • 62 ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
  • 63 The WikiEagle - January 2022
  • 64 Invitation
  • 65 Disambiguation link notification for April 16
  • 66 Vurg Dispute Resolution
  • 67 CS1 error on Chaonians
  • 68 CS1 error on Chaonians
  • 69 Disambiguation link notification for April 29
  • 70 Disambiguation link notification for May 15
  • 71 CS1 error on Ceraunian Mountains
  • 72 Waiting for response
  • 73 Disambiguation link notification for June 14
  • 74 Selckë
  • 75 Ali Pasha
  • 76 Disambiguation link notification for July 19
  • 77 Introduction to contentious topics
  • 78 New material in the talk page of M. Botsaris
  • 79 Dispute on Cham Albanian dialect
  • 80 Change of mind for Balkan Wars Articles
  • 81 Disambiguation link notification for November 19
  • 82 Disambiguation link notification for November 26
  • 83 November 2023
  • 84 ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
  • 85 Precious anniversary
  • 86 January 2024
  • 87 Κουντουριώτης
  • 88 Markos Botsaris has an RfC
  • DYK for Photios of Korytsa

    edit
    Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

    DYK for Poliçan, Gjirokastër

    edit
     — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:02, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

    DYK for Massacre of Phocaea

    edit
    Thank you Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

    DYK for Eritha

    edit
    Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:32, 31 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

    DYK for Kyra Vassiliki

    edit
     — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

    DYK for Dormition of the Theotokos Church, Labovë e Kryqit

    edit
    Gatoclass (talk) 15:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

    DYK for Military of Mycenaean Greece

    edit
    Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)Reply


    DYK for Mycenaean Greece

    edit

    On29 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mycenaean Greece, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Mask of Agamemnon (pictured) is probably the most famous artifact from Mycenaean Greece (c. 1600–1100 BC)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mycenaean Greece. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mycenaean Greece), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

    Gatoclass (talk) 15:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

    Your GA nomination of Northern Epirote Declaration of Independence

    edit

    The article Northern Epirote Declaration of Independence you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Northern Epirote Declaration of Independence for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 16:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

    DYK for Manthos Papagiannis

    edit

    On9 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Manthos Papagiannis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 16th-century Greek noble Manthos Papagiannis repeatedly solicited support from western European leaders for a planned uprising against the Ottoman Empire? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Manthos Papagiannis. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Manthos Papagiannis), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

    Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

    DYK for Lyngiades massacre

    edit

    On10 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lyngiades massacre, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 71 years after the Lyngiades massacre in Greece, President Joachim Gauck was Germany's first official representative to visit the site and express his apologies for the Wehrmacht's atrocities? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lyngiades massacre. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lyngiades massacre), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

    Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

    DYK for Samsun deportations

    edit

    On23 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Samsun deportations, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that U.S. admiral Mark Bristol unsuccessfully protested against the deportations of Samsun Greeks to the Turkish authorities of Mustafa Kemal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Samsun deportations. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Samsun deportations), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

    Alex ShihTalk 12:02, 23 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

    DYK for Candia massacre

    edit

    On10 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Candia massacre, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that two months after the Candia massacre, the last Ottoman soldiers left Crete, ending 253 years of Ottoman rule? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Candia massacre. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Candia massacre), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

    — Maile (talk) 00:12, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

    DYK for Evacuation of Ayvalik

    edit

    On31 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Evacuation of Ayvalik, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in May 1917, German general Liman von Sanders organized the expulsion of the Greek population of Ayvalık, Turkey, to inner Anatolia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Evacuation of Ayvalik. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Evacuation of Ayvalik), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

    — Maile (talk) 00:26, 31 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

    DYK for Petros Lantzas

    edit

    On4 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Petros Lantzas, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1608, Greek spy Petros Lantzas devised a plan to assassinate the Ottoman Sultan by placing a present containing explosives in front of him? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Petros Lantzas), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

    Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 4 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

    Byzantine Greeks

    edit

    Interesting the latest developments to this article, some users would like to change the name to Byzantines claiming that there is no connection to Greeks and placing POV tags. The same users have been reverted lately various times due to POV pushing. Thanks for your latest additions though. Othon I (talk) 18:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


    DYK for Pavlos Kouroupis

    edit

    On13 May 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pavlos Kouroupis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Colonel Pavlos Kouroupis was the first commanding officer defending Cyprus at the start of the Turkish invasion and is considered the first missing person of the conflict? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pavlos Kouroupis. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Pavlos Kouroupis), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

     — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 13 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

    Why are you blocking me from adding informations on Pileus ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeonDardan (talkcontribs) 13:49, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Codex Beratinus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

    It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sarandë, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ali Pasha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

    ArbCom 2019 election voter message

    edit
    Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

    The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

    If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    Hello. I am trying to promote the Battle of Sarantaporo to GA, so I wanted to ask whether you scanned the actual medal or an image of it? If its the latter can you clarify the source?--Catlemur (talk) 19:32, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

    Eleni Foureira

    edit

    I know you've edited on the Eleni Foureira article about how she is Greek not Albanian, but now I have an editor misunderstanding policy and trying to tell me policy says she is Albanian. Just was wondering if you could back me up in explaining this since I see your comments on the talk page explaining how policy shows she should be looked at as Greek. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 18:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

    Never mind, it's been cleared up. But the vandalism problem on Foureira's article regarding her nationality is still a major issue. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 18:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

    Φουρέιρα

    edit

    Καλησπέρα, Γιατί η αλλαγή; Από την Αλβανία είναι η κοπέλα, και η ίδια πήγε τώρα στην Αλβανία και είπε "Είμαι περήφανη που είμαι Αλβανίδα". Onoufrios d (talk) 21:18, 24 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

    Δεν βλέπω γιατί αυτό και μόνο μπορεί να επηρεάσει την εθνικότητα του προσώπου.Alexikoua (talk) 11:19, 25 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

    DYK nomination of Forty Saints Monastery, Sarandë

    edit

    Hello! Your submission of Forty Saints Monastery, Sarandë at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:45, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Alexikoua, there has been a new check made, and close paraphrasing/copyvio issues still persist. Please see the nomination page, and note that this is one example; you'll need to check for others as well. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:25, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
    An additional check was made, and I'm afraid there is still close paraphrasing in the article. It's important that you deal with it all, and do so soon. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:30, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
    edit

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Souliotes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mani and Olympus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

    DYK for Forty Saints Monastery, Sarandë

    edit

    On11 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Forty Saints Monastery, Sarandë, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although in ruins, the Forty Saints MonasteryinSarandë, Albania, still retains some religious importance for the local Greek Orthodox population? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Forty Saints Monastery, Sarandë. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Forty Saints Monastery, Sarandë), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

    Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 00:02, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
    edit

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pelion (Chaonia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illyricum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Thessalian Buas

    edit

    I just wanted to pay your attention to this diff and this statistics link. This editor (Rolandi+) argued about the difference between Bua and Buia although sources like this (Institutul de Istorie și Arheologie "A.D. Xenopol." (1987). Anuarul Institutului de Istorie și Arheologie "A.D. Xenopol.". ... Familiei Buia (Bua)...) say they are the same. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 11:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Simply nonsense. Rolandi +sockfarm are just short-term drive by SPAs.Alexikoua (talk) 13:43, 31 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
    edit

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nikaia, Illyria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parthenos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Reverting of my edits to Markos Botsaris article

    edit

    Dear user:Alexikoua,

    in regards to the addition of the name in Albanian language at the Markos Botsaris article lead section, I consider it is within Wikipedia's policies and guidelines but, still I shall review again the policies as per your suggestion and I would kindly like to discuss with you back again.

    In regards to the『The Greek–Albanian dictionary』section of the same article, there it is mentioned (third sentence): "...not in alphabetical order, and the Albanian words on the right, written in Greek letters." My edit was to remove the part "written in Greek letters". As I wrote to my explanation of the edit, in the Albanian part of the manuscript you can find the letter『ë』which is not part of the Greek alphabet but rather part of Albanian alphabet. So definitely the Albanian part is not written in Greek letters; such consideration is not supported and should be removed from the article. Or at least it should be re-written correctly clarifying that only the Greek part of the manuscript is written in Greek letters. Could you please kindly explain your revert of my edit at this part?

    Thank You! Bcon4rit (talk) 09:56, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Thanks for your contribution. About introduction in biographies see: Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Biography#Context: The opening paragraph should usually provide context for the activities that made the person notable. In most modern-day cases this will be the country of which the person is a citizen, national or permanent resident, or if the person is notable mainly for past events, the country where the person was a citizen, national or permanent resident when the person became notable.

    Ethnicity, religion, or sexuality should generally not be in the lead unless it is relevant to the subject's notability. Similarly, previous nationalities or the place of birth should not be mentioned in the lead unless they are relevant to the subject's notability.Alexikoua (talk) 20:26, 20 June 2020 (UTC)Reply


    Notification

    edit

    @Alexikoua: Hello Alexikoua. I have left a message on your Wikimedia Commons talk page. Have you seen it? Demetrios1993 (talk) 12:01, 6 July 2020 (UTC)Reply


    edit

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Illyrians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dardania.

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:28, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply


    Greek revolt of 1567–1572

    edit

    Hi Alexi! Thanks for creating the article. I've made some copyedits and corrections to the references, and tagged a few spots that are unclear/problematic (unfortunately I don't have the time to go through the sources myself). Cheers, Constantine 09:07, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Thanks Constantine, good job.Alexikoua (talk) 07:47, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
    edit

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ottoman Greece, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holy League.

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amantia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pliny.

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Talk Page: Vlorë

    edit

    What's wrong with changing the importance classification? Several cities are classified as TOP in WikiProject Albania and Vlorë is one of the top tier cities in Albania. The city has special importance because it is the city of the declaration of independence, the first capital of Albania, and represents a very important part of Albania ... so why not? The template is meant for the participants of WikiProject so I don't see whats your problem with that.

    On the other hand, this is an easily categorized article in class C. Therefore I wanted to hear the reasons for returning to Start. Wikipedia is very clear in scaling categories.Bes-ARTTalk 22:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Liberation Front.

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

    A barnstar for you!

    edit
    The Barnstar of Diligence
    Thank you for your work on many articles about Greece and Orthodoxy. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 02:32, 31 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

    DYK for Expulsion of Istanbul Greeks

    edit

    On4 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Expulsion of Istanbul Greeks, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the expulsion of Greeks from Istanbul in 1964–1965 was part of the final phase of state measures aimed at the Turkification of the local economic, social, and cultural life? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Expulsion of Istanbul Greeks), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

    Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 4 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Important Notice

    edit

    This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

    You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

    For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

    Doug Weller talk 14:17, 6 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Improper synthesis

    edit

    You can't translate The state represented by 'Kemara' in the list of hosts had two centres, Himarre andBorsh, both probably fortified, and farther north the Amantes hadstrong points at Kanine and at their political centre, Ploce.42 Inland,however, in central Epirus the only fortified places were in the plain ofIoannina, the centre of the Molossian state.Thus the north-west Greek-speaking tribes were at a half-way stage economically and politically, retaining the vigour of a tribal society andreaching out in a typically Greek manner towards a larger politicalorganization.toThey spoke a northwestern Greek dialect. It's a SYNTH use of bibliography and ignores the bibliographical discussion by extrapolating the view of one particular author, whose theory is already being discussed in the article.--Maleschreiber (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

    It is clear that "the north-west Greek-speaking tribes" refer to the ones mentioned in the previous paragraph, i.e. Amantes were one of them.Alexikoua (talk)
    There is no WP:SYNTH. SYNTH involves combining two or more sources, by definition. Maleschreiber, your behavior is bordering on bad faith and harassment. This has to stop, and it will, one way or another. Khirurg (talk) 04:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
    WP:SYNTH: Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources. Similarly, do not combine different parts of one source to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by the source. If you're going to argue about SYNTH, make sure to quote it correctly. Alexikoua is inferring from the same source something that is not mentioned explicitly. They are also adding WP:UNDUE material because Hammond is already being discussed in the article. It is Hammond's opinion that this population was Greek-speaking and that is explicitly mentioned in Hammond (1989) (not in Hammond's chapter in the CAH), but Hammond who is in the minority can't be readded in wikivoice (with a wrong citation) in order to bypass every other source and imply that almost every source which was published after 1990 considers them to be Illyrians, but also accepts that they were Greek-speaking - Hammond's theory. It's a problem of methodology to repeatedly highlight the one particular author with whom you agree, but whose corpus of works was written 40-60 years ago and is considered outdated today because we have 6 other sources written in the 21st century which don't reach the same conclusions as well as many others from his era which disagree with him.
    I'm trying to highlight how editing should function in terms of how bibliographical discussions are presented, but if you think that this is "harrassment", do what feels best for you and file a report and then everyone's editing history will be scrutinized. I think that everyone's activity should be discussed on AE, the administration board which has really improved the Balkan topic area with its decisions.--Maleschreiber (talk) 14:18, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
    Did you read the part about combining multiple sources? Now cut it out with the WP:BULLYING and WP:HARASSMENT or you will end up defending yourself at AE. Khirurg (talk) 16:57, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

    ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

    edit
    Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

    The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

    If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Apollonia (Illyria)

    edit

    Your edit today included a quote from a book by N.G.L. Hammond. The quote included misspellings and an odd system of spacing and punctuation. Does the quoted material appear this way in the book? Jellysandwich0 (talk) 17:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

    Thank you for the notice. It appears that copy-pasting text directly from googlebooks snippets sucks in this case.Alexikoua (talk) 17:36, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

    Removals

    edit

    Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Ancient Greece topics ([1][2]). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

    Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.--Lorik17 (talk) 20:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

    Blatantly irrelevant warning. Macedonian (talk) 20:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

    Ahem

    edit

    What are you doing? Drmies is me. Not you. Drmies (talk) 23:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Proto-Greek language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aulon.

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

    Warning

    edit

    Hi. Listen, basically, you should never cite WP:TROLL anywhere on Wikipedia, really for any reason, not to mention against editors in good standing involved in a discussion of an WP:ACDS matter. (For actual "trolls" WP:DENY is preferred.) So, please moderate your tone from now own, as this behaviour isn't conducive to a collaborative environment, and, may eventually result in sanctions. Thanks! El_C 15:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dassaretae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apollodorus.

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

    February 2021

    edit

    Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pashalik of Yanina, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

    About a DYK you reviewed

    edit

    Hello Alexikoua. Can I call you Alex? Alexi? Anyway, I'm here to bring to your attention that this DYK hook about a temple probably inspiring the design of India's Parliament House, which you reviewed in 2015, might not have been accurately cited. I've listed out my concerns at Parliament House's talk page. I hope you'll have a look at them. Cheers and kind regards, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse | fings wot i hav dun 07:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

    Sure, off course. I'm looking at the July 2015 version [[3]] now, but unfortunately one of the correspodent inlines appears now unavailable.~. [[4]].Alexikoua (talk) 10:03, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
    edit

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zvërnec, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aromanian.

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

    MOS

    edit

    Please follow MOS, in placement of images. --2603:7000:2143:8500:D8AB:DC6:F5AB:A9F1 (talk) 07:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

    If the order of the discussion of people is A, B - then you follow that order in the placement of images. Not the reverse - as you did repeatedly. Also, beyond that, we want to avoid sandwiching text between images -- as you have now done. Please follow the MOS for images. --2603:7000:2143:8500:3D36:6921:7E85:C984 (talk) 08:56, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
    That's a good reason to fix the order per chronological sequence. Good catch!Alexikoua (talk) 21:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

    Hormova

    edit

    May I know how do the sources provided fail wp:HISTRS ? Zemertrimi (talk) 11:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

    The reference you provided avoid to present their bibliography. That's a strong point for a work to fail wp:RS.Alexikoua (talk) 21:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

    Xlibris

    edit

    Xlibris is a self-publishing company. You probably didn't know that it's that sort of company, but we should all be a bit more careful when we see publishing houses with "exotic" names. --Maleschreiber (talk) 21:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

    Article "Refugees of the Greek Civil War"

    edit

    Article Refugees of the Greek Civil War needs a lot of work, as it is presently written from the Bulgarian-Slavo-Macedonian pov, based on (often consealed) slavo-macedonian sources. Thanks.--Skylax30 (talk) 16:03, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

    October 2021

    edit

    You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Devoll Municipality, Kardhiq and List of historic Greek countries and regions . This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

    Points to note:

    1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
    2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

    If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--InNeed95 (talk) 09:51, 8 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

    Gjirokastër

    edit

    Can I ask the reason you have reverted a citation error back into the article? Please see the very red error message in the article and read Help:Cite errors/Cite error references no text. As this is a noncontroversial technical fix, I'm going to revert back to my version so it no longer appears in the errors list. Thanks 89.241.33.89 (talk) 19:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

    Eleni Foureira birth name

    edit

    There are exceptions for gender-related issues, but I don't see any issue in the Eleni Foureira article that means we should suppress her birth name—although I agree from context that it is not her current legal name. If there's an extenuating circumstance, feel free to reply here if you want to discuss it away from the article's talk page. (Please ping me so I see the message.) —C.Fred (talk) 18:47, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:Omonoia logo.jpg

    edit
    ⚠
    Thanks for uploading File:Omonoia logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 18:45, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply


    Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

    edit

    This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding dispute discussion you have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Arvanites".The discussion is about the topic Arvanites.

    Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
    Othon I (talk) 16:54, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

    A favour

    edit

    Hi Alexikoua, it 's been too long since we last met in WP. I am happy to see that you are still active. So, might I ask a favour? Article on EOKA is pretty good. It has some major drawbacks, but with little work, it could became a Good Article. How nice would be that? My understanding is that it needs an introduction (that s where I need your help- could you do it? I could try but I feel most editors think I am biased) Other drawbacks is the undue weight on section of "Foreign Office declassified documents and EOKA lawsuits against the British government". (this can be solved with a little goodwill) Also, the Legacy and Aftermath sections need expanding but I didn't find a real RS (I mean academic work that discuss the effect EOKA struggle had on Cypurs -TC, GC, leftists- or on global scale). That 's the biggest obstacle. Otherwise, we are close enough to getting GA status. Cheers! Cinadon36 07:45, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

    That's great news to hear! It will be a pleasure to contribute together to upgrade it to GA. I'm already checking those issues.Alexikoua (talk) 08:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
    Great, thanx! Cinadon36 08:27, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

    ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

    edit
    Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

    The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

    If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

    The WikiEagle - January 2022

    edit
    The WikiEagle
    The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter
    Volume I — Issue 1
    Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
    Announcements
    • After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
    • On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
    • Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion.
    • The Jim Lovell article was promotedtoFeatured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7.
    • The Raymond Hesselyn article was promotedtoGood Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed.
    • The Supermarine Sea King article was promotedtoGood Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125.
    • The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promotedtoGood Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
    Members

    New Members

    Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

    Closed Discussions


    Featured Article assessment

    Good Article assessment

    Deletion

    Requested moves

    Article Statistics
    This data reflects values from DMY.
    New/Ongoing Discussions

    On The Main Page


    Did you know...

    Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagleatThe WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list.
    Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

    MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

    Invitation

    edit

    Hello Alexikoua!, I have seen your considerable edits on Ali Pasha, Pashalik of Yanina and related articles. I invite you to move discussiononTalk:Ali Pasha of Ioannina. Marmidukay (talk) 22:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaonians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aulon.

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Vurg Dispute Resolution

    edit

    Hello, I am writing to inform you that a discussion regarding the content of the article Talk:Vurg#Lefter Talo has been taking place on its talk page, and it has reached a point where it seems necessary to bring it to the attention of the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. I wanted to give you a heads up since you have been involved in the discussion, [[5]] Thank You! RoyalHeritageAlb (talk) 20:11, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

    CS1 error on Chaonians

    edit

    Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Chaonians, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

    Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:12, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

    CS1 error on Chaonians

    edit

    Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Chaonians, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

    Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:13, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amantia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Argos.

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaonians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chora.

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

    CS1 error on Ceraunian Mountains

    edit

    Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ceraunian Mountains, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

    Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:18, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Waiting for response

    edit

    Hi Alexikoua, as you've maybe noticed, we're waiting for a response at Kos. Mind that your response could affect multiple articles, or you may dismiss your argument.

    Cheers, - AlexBachmann (talk) 19:32, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ceraunian Mountains, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karaburun Peninsula.

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Selckë

    edit

    I don't understand that edit summary. You are welcome to discuss the matter on the talk page or at WP:RSN. Drmies (talk) 17:49, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Allow me if I may: I think it's a typo, he probably meant to say, "I don't see why...". Khirurg (talk) 17:55, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
    Excactly.Alexikoua (talk) 18:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Ali Pasha

    edit

    Do not introduce WP:FRINGE narrative by WP:CHERRYPICKING the sources like here [6] and [[here [7]. Misrepresenting what the source says is considered unconstructive editing. – Βατο (talk) 20:05, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Thats exactly how Fleming reads. What's wrong about?Alexikoua (talk) 22:57, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
    edit

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Notis Botsaris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fara.

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Introduction to contentious topics

    edit

    You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

    A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

    Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

    Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

    Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:11, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

    New material in the talk page of M. Botsaris

    edit

    In case you are interested, you may participate in the talk page of "Markos Botsaris". Recently I added some (almost) unpublished archival material that may need interpretation. Skylax30 (talk) 19:37, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Dispute on Cham Albanian dialect

    edit
    Stop icon
    Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

    Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nishjan (talk) 16:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

    It appears you can't follow wp:NOT. Just make a good use of the basic guidelines before posting false warnings again.Alexikoua (talk) 23:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Change of mind for Balkan Wars Articles

    edit

    Now that I think about it, the opening to the atrocities section states “the heavy and rapid defeat of the Ottoman army prevented the safe evacuation of muslim civilians, making them a clear target for the invading armies of the Balkan League”, I think this alone clearly implies that the vast majority/almost all of the Ottoman muslim civilian deaths took place during the first Balkan war, or at least duirng the first war and interregnum between the First and second Balkan war SamuelLion1877 (talk) 00:34, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    We should take into account all available scholarship in general. Simply depending on a specific quote and by ignoring all the rest constitutes wp:POV.Alexikoua (talk) 03:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
    Wtf are you talking about? No I think all you had to say was “I personally disagree with these two accredited historians so I am going to continuously vandalize and disrupt the page First Balkan War by removing sourced content and massacres of ottoman civilians both of which are sourced by accredited western historians SamuelLion1877 (talk) 05:04, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
    Absolutely none of the sources and references we used in the article go against Wikipedia’s policies. You are a liar and a disruptive editor, the only thing they “go against” or “violate” is your own personal biased opinion. See the talk page on the Balkan Wars article. Me and user Khuriug both agreed it was best to leave the two articles as they were as the vast majority of these deaths took place during the first Balkan war or at least the interregnum between the first and second Balkan war, not the second as that hardly involved the ottomans.
    Moreover, I like how you completely made a U turn on your position in the last 24 hours, your first complaint was that the atrocities section should be moved to the Balkan Wars article, they were, and immediately user Khirug rv it and eventually agreed with me after some discussion that they should be kept on First Balkan War. Now all of a sudden the sources are somehow not reliable because you didn’t get your way? Get over yourself SamuelLion1877 (talk) 05:08, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
    edit

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qeparo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ephyra.

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qeparo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ephyra.

    (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    November 2023

    edit
    Stop icon
    Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

    Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Iaof2017 (talk) 13:52, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

    edit

    Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

    The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

    If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Precious anniversary

    edit
    Precious
    Seven years!

    --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

    January 2024

    edit

    You are an old editor here. Why are you ignoring the basic guidelines and behaving in nationalistic manner? This Illyrian maximalism lunacy by ignoring all available research has to stop.Alexikoua (talk) 12:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Don't cast aspersions, please, and don't falsify sources, because it is highly disruptive for Wikipedia. – Βατο (talk) 12:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Actually the only one that's disruptive about partially interpreting scholarship is you. Those maximalist Illyrian nonsense will soon lead in restrictions.Alexikoua (talk) 13:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Κουντουριώτης

    edit

    Τσέκαρε εδώ Talk:Georgios Kountouriotis D.S. Lioness (talk) 18:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Markos Botsaris has an RfC

    edit
    Markos Botsaris has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Jtrrs0 (talk) 12:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Add topic

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alexikoua&oldid=1225765068"
     



    Last edited on 26 May 2024, at 15:31  


    Languages

     



    This page is not available in other languages.
     

    Wikipedia


    This page was last edited on 26 May 2024, at 15:31 (UTC).

    Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Terms of Use

    Desktop