![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Answered in the page review. 148.101.39.37 (talk) 06:44, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Reyour revisionatAssassination of Abraham Lincoln: Thank you for keeping an eye on that article - much appreciated. And it's interesting to me...that statement by the eyewitness (David Dorn) would seem to somewhat be in error. These are the issues:
Heh well, that's all. Shearonink (talk) 18:06, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
I didn't add Switched-On Bachto{{Electronic rock}} and don't have an opinion about its inclusion or your revert of my edit, but here's a friendly reminder to complete the task and remove the link from the navbox as well, to preserve the bidirectionality of the navbox. Thanks, and happy editing! Ibadibam (talk) 01:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Seems he's the latest version of a chaos maker on Wikipedia as of late. Do you think he's deserving of an LTA page? He just made a lame attempt to troll me based on my band userboxes on my userpage. It was rather humorous, I'll admit. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 15:34, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
You asked me to join sources in the genre section of the infoox when I did my change, something that I can comprehend, but can you tell me where the sources are for the "pop, rock, electronic" genres?
It's more for the genres previously mentioned that I would personally like to see a serious source, because I don't think it's a question of "point of view" that St Germain's music has nothing to do with pop and rock, and vice versa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.161.19.252 (talk) 20:17, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
I have noticed a regular editing patten within the Coldplay related articles by you and the Kent IP addresses. It is very good how you manage to spot the sock puppetry edits that these IP addresses have made. Iggy (Swan) 18:48, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Discogs is a reliable source, because they accurately reproduce credits from album sleeves, so you must have sent this message by mistake and please be careful of you who single out. I have previously used Discogs as a source, especially when adding the studios for Linda Ronstadt's "Heart Like a Wheel", but nobody reverted that edit. 60.240.8.249 (talk) 20:46, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
Excuse me, but my edit on the Gina G page is not vandalism. I never said she was dead, simply that she was not musically active anymore, which is correct considering she hasn't released anything since 2011 and doesn't perform anymore either. Perhaps I misunderstood what "years active" means in which case I apologise but call it vandalism is ridiculous.
Secondly, your reversion of my edit on the Daria Kasatkina page is even more absurd. I simply updated her career high ranking in the lead sentence, which was out-of-date and now, because of your revert, is once again (as per the infobox and her WTA profile).
FYI, I have never vandalised Wikipedia, and the other earlier warnings on my page are also from admins who have misunderstood my edits which are ALL in good faith. No wonder this site is losing editors with such an attitude of thinking everybody is a vandal. 86.17.57.21 (talk) 22:55, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Your input on List of Christian rock bands's talk page was appreciated. I'd like to see something done, not just have it left as is. 2600:1702:1690:E10:5DB1:E494:B72E:DDE8 (talk) 21:04, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I understand you bringing up WP:SYNTH, I was expecting it at some point as I had tried to open a discussion on the talk page while the page was locked. Anyway, the way I see it is that the page is either about the term "white genocide" or the conspiracy theory that Jews want to corrupt white people with African blood. If it is the second, then Hitler can be included:
Personally, I am of the belief that this can be included even though the exact words "white genocide" were not used by Hitler. If a modern far-right leader said that Jews were bringing in black people to corrupt the white race – without using the exact words "white genocide" – this would be included in the article. However, Wikipedia is not my personal website so I respect consensus and will not revert you. Anarcho-authoritarian (talk) 17:47, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 07:03, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
I apologize for that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.173.173 (talk) 21:35, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carrie (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Margaret White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
...but I've really no idea where to send "personal messages / mail" within this system. I've a question for you, for the simple reason you were the person who welcomed me to the site some time back. Could you let me know if there is a more appropriate forum / method for my asking you questions regarding the finer points of wikipedia-ing? Thanks in advance! :oD Saturn comes back around (talk) 16:07, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
There is a discussion involving you on the Administrators incident board here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User_Binksternet_attempting_to_abuse_RFC_to_overturn_previously_achieved_concensus S806 (talk) 04:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Why did you remove my edits. Haven't you checked out what I edited? There are many mistakes by links for example the album Us is a link of the United States, the video album P.O.V. shows a television thing which has nothing to do with Peter Gabriel and so on. And I added Academy Awards, Golden Globe Awards and brought it all in a good looking form. By the way the overediting you did is worse and looks awful. Check it out before removing my (improving) edits! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.20.171.32 (talk) 02:25, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I don't believe that any of my edits were disruptive, and we're all properly referenced as you asked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chicksfromvenus (talk • contribs) 05:42, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
I posted a response to you earlier (accidentally in Talk, not here), so instead of receiving a respectful response from you, like your previous contribution, I was the unfortunate recipient of an intrusive, arrogant reply from a domdeparis and an accusatory Shellwood. Had they taken the time to read my response, they would have realized I was being neither "vandalizing" nor "biased", as suggested. All I am trying to accomplish is to have the link to The Outlaw page removed from Jeff Howell, and accurate information and photos entered in its' place. Of course it should be included as a relevant link, just not as the Wiki Page that depicts "who/what" Jeff Howell is. That's just a brief moment in his life.
I also don't think it was necessary to get a lecture from domdeparis about being allowed to enter our own biographical information, due to "having a conflict of interest". I don't mean for this to sound confrontational. It was an observation. I noticed your Wikipedia page is written in the first person. Is it permitted or no? , I just happened upon it when trying to figure out how to message you on this talk page, and noticed that it appears to be personally written, so, since I was just scolded for doing that, thought I should ask.
This is what I initially responded to you: Thank you for your inquiry. I have just been made aware that the link to my husband, Jeff Howell (formerly of The Outlaws, Foghat, Savoy Brown, to name a few), goes directly to The Outlaw Wikipedia page. This is incorrect, and mainly irrelevant to his personal biographical content. An assistant attempted to add more pertinent information for us by quickly cutting and pasting more appropriate content from Jeff’s personal website, www.jeffhowell.org, until it can be more extensively addressed, but it has been changed back several times without confirming whether the content is correct or inquiring why we have attempted to change it. I am not fluent in coding and providing references, etc., but will provide the required information after learning how to include it. If you could provide any assistance in this area, it would be most appreciated. If I have been blocked to edit information, kindly remove it. I am only trying to remove an inaccurate link from my husbands personal Wikipedia page. Not change the Outlaw page. How can this be accomplished? Can you assist? Thank you LindaJhowell (talk) 14:12, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
So, since this writing, I understand a little more about the fact there are "rules" for Wikipedia, however haven't had time to review everything I obviously need to know. I'm a busy person. What I do know is I don't need some little gnat of a man (not you) to be condescending and know-it-ally with me. Perhaps if he had been more supportive and intent on providing accurate information, I wouldn't have gotten the response he felt necessary to give. Thanks for any support you can provide. (I have no idea if I'm doing the following correctly)LindaJhowell (talk) 01:57, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[1]
References
Please — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.240.4 (talk) 18:15, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
*yawn*. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 20:01, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I’m writing to ask if you might be willing to contribute a vote on the Articles for Deletion page for Jesse Waugh. The vote already took place based on the article’s current sources, but certain people seem to be determined to get it deleted. Thanks either way. 81.44.32.50 (talk) 07:09, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
(re the Jesse Waugh Afd)104.163.147.121 (talk) 01:48, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Can you please assist me in rangeblocking this IP user? Or protecting the articles it targets? —IB [ Poke ] 04:02, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.
For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
What I have made wasn't an original source, it truly is a DLC for both games, here's Just Dance 2015 citation [5], and Just Dance 2014 citation, [6]
Thanks for showing me the guidelines! DJ FunkFunk 10:59, 4 April 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djfunkfunk (talk • contribs)
An editor add this genre in the article, is the album is psychedelic music? TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 20:55, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi you have recently accused me of edit warring on the page of the 1953 Iranian coup d'etat, I was only reverting your vandalism. Miles Copeland Jr was a key figure during the coup:
"Roosevelt told Zahedi that former CIA official Miles Copeland was the most qualified person to assess the situation in the country. If Copeland decided that nothing could be done, then there would no point in attempting a coup." (Page 58, Politics of Confrontation: The Foreign Policy of the USA and Revolutionary Iran).
Miles Copeland, who was dispatched to Iran by Roosevelt to make a logistical survey in preparation for the coup, sheds further light. Having arrived in Tehran, Copeland discovered that CIA operatives had already charted the routes that the demonstrating hordes would have to take, and pinpointed the targets that anyone organising a coup would (...) (page 116, Covert Action in the Cold War: US Policy, Intelligence and CIA Operations)
So please stop your mindless vandalism.
VendixDM (talk) 17:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Then why don't you go ahead and remove Shapoor Reporter as well? Copeland had a similar role, probably even of more importance. He should be listed.
VendixDM (talk) 21:47, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello Binksternet, you have flagged me for edit warring on the "Chicago" band article. I was not the editor on the initial changes, I merely added sources to justify the edit that guitar be added to Neil Donell. There is a sourced article associated with those changes. Can you review your decision to revert my edits based on what was added. I have no intention of being part of an edit war, I just wanted the article to reflect the correct information based on sources. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.212.21.197 (talk) 20:34, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
please report this scam website to your superiors http://wikiprofessionalsinc.org ≈≈ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.134.75.212 (talk) 16:49, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from editing the smooth jazz article to suit your jazz purist POV definition. Smooth jazz isn't solely a pop music genre. It is a jazz genre influenced by pop and R&B. ANDROS1337TALK 16:38, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Good afternoon,
Could you please have a look at and maybe respond to my suggestion on the Prince Talk page? Thanks in advance DJ FunkFunk 17:25, 16 April 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djfunkfunk (talk • contribs)
Hi! Templating Gwillhickers didn't improve either the Thomas Jefferson article or the collaborative relationships among editors so necessary to building the encyclopedia. Besides being offensive, the template was flat wrong: he wasn't trying to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy. Your edit summary here was also unhelpful. You asked for other opinions on the TJ talk page; I gave mine, which you may care to think about. I hope you choose to reconcile with Gwillhickers. Best wishes, YoPienso (talk) 01:40, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
I was not edit-warring. I took the matter to the talk page and you failed to respond. I have deleted your message. PlatinumHeron (talk) 17:06, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
Have your first Barnstar! I love your continuous edits. ―YoloMaxi ☎ (contribs) 21:56, 26 April 2018 (UTC) |
The Citation Barnstar | |
For your tireless efforts in deleting unsourced things. ―YoloMaxi ☎ (contribs) 22:08, 27 April 2018 (UTC) |
What exactly did I vandalise ?.2A00:23C5:2E01:FB01:88D7:947:A2AF:6ECB (talk) 21:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Binksternet, the first problem with the 'warning' you placed on my talk page is that there was no basis for it. It seems that you were confused by an edit I made on the FRC page in which I removed language calling FRC an advocacy organization. The edit you referenced did not have the slightest shred of POV to it. It is a simple matter of tax law. A nonprofit organization under IRC Section 501(c)(3) is, by definition, a charitable organization. Such an organization is also, by definition, not an advocacy organization; advocacy organizations fall within the category of social welfare organizations, which are tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(4) of the Code. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, FRC is not an advocacy organization. For more information on this topic, please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/501(c)_organization.
The second problem is that instead of asking for clarification for an edit I made that confused you, you placed a 'warning' on my page that had no basis whatsoever.
I would ask that you please remove your 'warning,' take a look at Wikipedia:AGF and Wikipedia:ASPERSIONS, and refrain from jumping to conclusions about my edits without communicating with me first. SunCrow (talk) 05:18, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
The new sock smells like a Aussie sock and have a very distinctive editing style. Soft pop (talk) 18:03, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Hey there. I've reported Tha Industry as a promotional username. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 14:28, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
I don't feel that the revert of my deletion of Britain First from the "British Fascism" section was appropriate. Whilst it is true that Britain First is a far-right, ultra-nationalist organisation, it does not fit with many of the core tenets of fascism that distinguish it from other far-right ideologies. Britain First barely has an ideology at all, and with its focus on the issues of "free speech" and "radical Islam," it sits more with the alt-lite/alt-right "ideologies." Websites that label it "fascist" do so as an epithet. If Wikipedia is supposed to be balanced, then we should assess things as we see them, and not falsely label groups as something they are not.
King Flib (talk) 15:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Binksternet - I notice that you’ve done a lot of editing of the Robert Palmer page including trying to sort out the issues caused be the San Diego hoaxer. It looks like references to Palmer's supposed first wife and children stem from this hoaxer. Historical articles and articles from reliable sources all only mention one wife and two children. Thanks - Canberra8649 (talk) 10:12, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Binksternet,
I was reverting modifications of a french contributor (92.93.201.39) that has altered the genres of music/artists of english pages. You have also done the same thing in the past. He seems pretty active on frwiki too, so I have to take care of his modifications... Can you leave him a message adapted to your practices and tell him to stop in the future? Thank you in advance. Lofhi (talk) 22:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello there. You have deleted or modified information pertaining to the articles James Fetzer and Harry Oldmeadow. You have not explained your reversions of these sourced edits which have been made in accordance with elemenatary principles of wikipedia. Threats pertaining to 'Edit Wars' simply will not hold. 82.27.90.157 (talk) 23:24, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi
I have to admit that I might have caused a misunderstanding here. This might have caused 82.27.90.157 to remove the Whois template, which I personally would not have removed. However, the template's documentation also explicitly says:
Please do not use this template on the talk pages of evidently good-faith constructive IP users, since its wording could be misunderstood as implying the IP's edits are problematic. Restoration of this template is not exempt from the edit warring policy, and editors who repeatedly restore it may be blocked to prevent further disruption.
I hope this explains and solves the problem. Thank you very much for all your work! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:46, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
You removed this album from two different pages, and I can't seem to figure out how to undo it. I've never had to cite a reference to add an album to a discography before. The album is plainly visible in the discography of Jethro Tull's website as a Jethro Tull album: http://jethrotull.com/discography/. It's also marketed as a Jethro Tull album on the Amazon.com website: https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_i_3_16?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=jethro+tull+the+string+quartets&sprefix=Jethro+Tull+The+%2Caps%2C135&crid=1BNFL0VUY0WWV. Please restore.Divamanhughes (talk) 19:59, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Hey Binksternet, you might see this editor's revision anyway, but is it correct to add a parent that doesn't have an article to the infobox? I thought we only mentioned notable ones (i.e. with an article) in the infobox. Ss112 06:12, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
World Wisdom - America's leading publisher of Perennialist literature - describes Traditionalism: Religion in the Light of the Perennial Philosophy (2000) as 'an authoritative introduction to the perspective of Perennialism'. Martin Lings called it 'an excellent introduction to the Perennialist perspective' (page xi, The Underlying Religion). Indeed the book received the University of Sydney's Medal of Excellence in Research award. All this seems to jar with your claim that the book has 'very low prominence'. Do you have some specific reason why the book should not be recommended? 82.27.90.157 (talk) 13:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Any idea who Special:Contributions/The_Lotto_Genius is? They were quite prolific before self-destructing, and didn't seem like a newbie. - BilCat (talk) 01:58, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
given that the user a final warning (but recently removed). Any disruptive edits after that, make sure to report it. 183.171.123.78 (talk) 02:57, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Britain First is not a fascist political party. They openly denounce fascism and there is no indication they are. The only truth is that they have been labelled as fascist. Now that is quite different from being a fascist. Wikipedia should not be biased in any way. Correct the wording, please. Let the article state that the group is far-right and many people call it fascist, instead of stating that they are fascist.[11] --Kingdamian1 (talk) 02:01, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Robert Lamm did in fact play Hammond organ on "Lowdown" and Terry Kath used distortion and wah-wah on his electric guitar on that song. This cannot be negated by listening to the song. Giving such ambiguous words such as guitar and/or keyboards may create uncertainty about what type of guitars or keyboards were used. 1.43.34.138 (talk) 03:49, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
The "home studio" where The Who recorded "Won't Get Fooled Again" was in fact Stargroves, Mick Jagger's country home in Hampshire. 61.69.205.223 (talk) 06:40, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello Binksternet, I thought to go to your talk page because of the issue that an anonymous user is repedetly putting the Eagles and The Rolling Stones as pioneering glam metal bands. It is an unsourced addition, but if I repeatedly delete it I could get blocked, so I was wondering if you could revert his edits and try to protect it from the addition of the two bands. If you could help I would greatly appreciate it, thank you. Sixty Minute Limit (talk) 14:27, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. Sixty Minute Limit (talk) 17:50, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
This is listed on the page for this song as being the instrumental credits for the song:
Gabriel provided lead vocals and piano.[22] Robert Fripp, Paul Weller and Dave Gregory performed guitar. However, the names of the individual instrumentalists for each track was not included on the sleeve of the album.[29] The guitarist for "Biko" is thought to be David Rhodes, Gabriel's longtime collaborator.[29] A 2016 "listener's companion" to Gabriel's music named Phil Collins as the drummer on the song, Larry Fast as playing the synthesizer, and Jerry Marotta as playing the snare drum.[22]
The part where it says that the album did not list individual credits for each track is false. All of the individuals are listed for each track on the lyric sheet that came with the album. I don't know if represses/rereleases over the years docked that, but on the original Mercury Records release from 1980, it specifies that David Rhodes did play the guitar on this track, that being the reason I first edited that page.
I sincerely apologize for any edits i did not provide reasoning or sources to
Lil google (talk) 9:25, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
The One Hit Wonders list is inaccurate and incorrect. Several acts that are not one-hit wonders are being treated as such. A Flock of Seagulls, Madness, Matthew Wilder, a-ha, Dead or Alive, 'Til Tuesday, and Swing Out Sister have had subsequent Top 40 hits. I propose we go back to using the Hot 100 as the standard for determining one-hit wonders. 50.111.24.195 (talk) 19:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
I reverted some of his edits , but he is going on reverting your contributions. Kpgjhpjm 08:28, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Would you like to weigh in this discussion regarding Metacritic's indication of "universal acclaim" be used to verify that this album "was met with widespread critical acclaim"? Editor SummerPhDv2.0 has objected to this, reasons detailed here above the discussion. Only if you interested. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 17:51, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Why do I keep citing reliable sources? What should I do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.253.107.14 (talk) 12:33, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
I filed an SPI report. Can you check it out? 183.171.122.247 (talk) 13:51, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Giving citation might be better... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.253.107.14 (talk) 22:42, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello Binsternet,
I just added the Chicago II Live at Soundstage album to this article, and I noticed you deleted all of the live albums. The album in question does appear on the Discography page. Wouldn't it make sense to also leave the live album list in the main article, since some of those albums are assigned a number based on how Chicago numbers their albums. By removing them, it looks like some of the albums are missing here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.212.21.197 (talk) 00:43, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Binksternet,
Thanks for your response to my inquiry. I have reviewed the relevant guideline you provided about generally not including live albums in the discography section of the musician's primary article, and confess I was unaware of this. The only additional consideration I would add is since it states the "primary article should also provide a summary of the musician's major works," that at least Chicago at Carnegie Hall might reasonably be considered one of the band's major works. It was one of the best selling box sets of all time (per the Wikipedia article for that album). The Chicago: VI Decades Live (This is What We Do) four CD and one DVD box set of all new material from the band's entire history might also be considered a major work based on the scope of the project. This band probably has more official live albums than most groups, who might only have one live album. I think including at least some of the live albums in the main article here might be warranted, but will abide by your decision either way. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.212.21.197 (talk) 20:31, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
I don't know how to use just one IP and i didn't vandalized nothing. --189.216.123.94 (talk) 07:06, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Would you like to weigh in this discussion regarding AllMusic should be in infoboxes over other publications. Only if you interested. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:59, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello Binksternet. You reverted and said it was block evasion. What block do you think this person is evading? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 01:40, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:11, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I see you have reverted unreferenced changes to the Satanic Rites article regarding the demos influence on black metal. I have added a couple of sources and completed the sentence in the lead that had been left cut-off for well over a year. :] GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 17:32, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Why accuse me of vandalizing Wikipedia? I was only correcting every detail about everything I see in the story of Don Bluth's All Dogs Go to Heaven (1989), and on the history of its home video releases. The original VHS release on August 28, 1990 includes a commercial for Boys & Girls Clubs of America featuring the late Dom DeLuise, and a trailer for Rock-a-Doodle (1991), another of Bluth's animated films. Plus, I know Jonny Quest vs. The Cyber Insects (1995) is an American television film produced by Hanna-Barbera, but it was animated overseas by Fil-Cartoons in Manila, Philippines. So did the closing credits told me, Fil-Cartoons appear to be responsible for associating with Hanna-Barbera on its other animation projects including The Pirates of Dark Water (1991–1993), Young Robin Hood (1991–1992), The Addams Family (1992–1993) and The Halloween Tree (1993). So... WHAT'D YOU THINK I'M AT?! A TRIAL AT SOME KANGAROO COURT?!?!?!?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.224.57.136 (talk) 02:43, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
[12] Doug Weller talk 11:06, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you removed an infobox track listing with the summary "rv infobox bloat, unimportant".[13] I personally feel that these are of limited value and contribute to "bloat". This was discussed when infobox song and single were merged, but there was no consensus, due mostly to one holdout (who was later blocked as a socket puppet). Is it time to revisit the issue? I think several editors would still support removing them. FYI, this is the current guidance from the template documentation page. —Ojorojo (talk) 16:02, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Feel free to comment at the new discussion: Template talk:Infobox song#Make it go away -- partial track listing. Binksternet (talk) 21:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Does this article need semiprotection? I see a zillion IP edits and it appears many of them are getting reverted. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 03:49, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
Especially for your determination in tracking persistent, disruptive sock accounts. Cheers, 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:51, 19 July 2018 (UTC) |
Your conspiracy theory about me editing from the State Dept. and logging out to correct spelling errors are both aspersions and is a false accusation of socking. See here: [14][15] I already said you should have a chance to delete the aspersions[16], but they're still up there and I see you have been editing since then so it's not an issue of being too busy. Please be advised that if you do not delete the false claims, I intend to seek a remedy to this situation that will probably be a report filed on you. Jerry the Bellybutton Elf (talk) 01:14, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Please stop reverting editors's changes on the Exodus article. Adding information that happens to be correct and is worth being mentioned in an article on Wikipedia is not vandalism. 205.154.222.41 (talk) 17:26, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Since you know a lot about music articles, can you check out these contributions to see if they are legit. This ip is making a lot quick without discussion. thanks JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 15:55, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for editing this page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonny_Seeza), but I've never heard of such a nickname as "Lil Suavé". I don't know where the previous editor got it nickname, but Sonny Seeza always been known simply as "Suavé". As evidence, I can show for example this photo from the booklet of ONYX's debut album "Bacdafucup" (1993): https://img.discogs.com/9K_q21DLUozO2xyTq1vjJjBzV0c=/fit-in/600x634/filters:strip_icc():format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/R-4803312-1446234566-4825.jpeg.jpg Felix Montana (talk) 21:31, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
I agree about discogs, but i'm working with Onyx since 2014 as a blogger, I read many articles and interviews from magazines and websites, i myself create many posts and I swear that I've never heard such a nickname as "Lil Suavé", he always was known as Suavé (from 1988 to 1994) then he change his name to "Sonny Seeza" (while Onyx working on a second album in 1994). As another evidence I can offer his biography on his page on Bandcamp: https://sonseeza.bandcamp.com (Tyrone Taylor (born November 13, 1970) better known by his stage name Sonny Seeza who was previously known as both Suavé and Sonsee, is an American hardcore rapper from Brooklyn, New York and an original member of the hardcore rap group Onyx.) Felix Montana (talk) 21:59, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
What exactly was clunky about what I wrote? I was quoting both sentences straight from the refs. 2A00:23C5:2E01:FB01:A52A:1086:7A72:6E6F (talk) 21:56, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |