![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Sorry Binks, forgot to update this. took this to DR.
I hope I succinctly elucidated your line-of-argument (I think I have, and I do understand your POV, but still I think we need some fresh eyes). StorchBaby (talk) 00:25, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
P.S. is there a way to have a different name showing up in sig but still have the same username? Like I see some guys with funky formatting every time they sign. I want to use StorchedEarth as my sig
(I also replied on my own talk page; I prefer you reply there but you can reply here.)
This is about List of one-hit wonders in the United States.
I can see your confusion. I requested to remove anything that was never put in the top 40; you pointed out (and I agree) that isn’t a good idea. The edit I made was not removing songs which never made the top 40; no the edit I made was one done in accordance with Wikipedia policy and consensus. We need to remove entries which do not have two reliable sources saying they are a one hit wonder (as per consensus on that page); I found about 32 entries which relied on a forum posting, which is not a reliable source, as per Wikipedia policy. The edit I made was not disruptive and it was done in policy, but I can see why you’re confused, since I did suggest something else. Samboy (talk) 02:21, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
It's a example of crude, vulgar journalese and you are not going to impose it on articles. I replace it with the appropriate preposition, verb or verbal phrase which improves the syntax of the sentence. You reverted my edits for no good reason. If left to you, all Wikipedia articles would read like articles from "USA Today" or "Variety". I've replaced "via" hundreds of time and not one has been reverted except by you. I'm going to restore my edits again and again and again until you stop vandalizing them! Autodidact1 (talk) 09:47, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
I think administrator intervention is warranted for Bus stop's actions, so I've opened Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Bus_stop_at_Talk:Oakland_Ghost_Ship_fire.--Jasper Deng (talk) 16:03, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Since Discogs is considered to be unreliable, is Allmusic considered to be unreliable as well? 73.240.105.138 (talk) 23:49, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello Binksternet. I'd appreciate it, if you'd have a look at Woody Shaw. There have been a number of pain-in-the-neck edits by 4 ostensibly different numbered editors. Below are the links to their contributions. All of them only edit Shaw, and all of them are very similar. To me this looks like a numbered sockpuppeteer. For openers, do you agree? (Also, your answer to the previous inquiry about All Music clarified an issue for me. Thanks!)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2604:2000:E288:5B00:5141:27EA:B730:E05A https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2601:184:4780:6D8:D135:B9B:1DEE:9F42 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2604:2000:E288:5B00:A1FB:7F8B:455C:732F https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2604:2000:F9C3:2300:959F:94D4:73FA:763F
Regards Tapered (talk) 00:46, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Beardyman is huge. Guy (Help!) 13:01, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
I don't really care for this article but it's seems like editors keep removing her birth name off the article, for example here. I not be surprised this from the same editor who keep doing this. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:12, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Earliler today, where I noticed the figure for one particular P-80's velocity (the one that was edited), at a time within a decade of a "top velocity" figure that was recorded by an aircraft from a former adversary of the Second World War, I would think that something of that sort might be something potentially worthy of comparison, providing it has a pertinent citation; which did exist for the "top velocity" figure for the adversary nation's rocket fighter from October 1941. Now, to be fair, this is just the very first time I seem to have "run afoul" of yourself, but I've never had any intention of doing anything deliberately "disruptive" of any sort at Wikipedia. Perhaps the edit involving the MiG-8's mention could be considered a "stretch" (which I would have retracted if so-advised), but I've never even heard from you before...I also make every attempt to seek out a decently reliable citation for any revision(s) I post, so I'm not deliberately making "repeated disruptive posts" at any time. I'm simply hoping, with all due sincerity, that you're not someone that actually enjoys doing that sort of thing, because those sorts do exist; and if you've ever "run afoul" of them yourself, you might be able to understand, even slightly, what I've been though on some very rare occasions in my own past. Thank you in advance, The PIPE (talk) 23:34, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
I am confused as to what is going on? I posted accurate information and it seems you are saying as long as one person is intent on suppressing that information it will stay suppressed? Everything I wrote was from Either the SPLC, the Washington post, the Attorney General of the USA, and from the people directly. Because it makes them seem less credible and biased it is just not allowed? I have never edited in here before but I have given money and I am getting kind of pissed. The first one I got what I did wrong, and didn't type directly so fixed it. All of it accurate. I can see in the talk page on it that that same guy has kept other people from editing it as well. Seems he is intent on protecting them. Not ok for a public platform. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.108.111.75 (talk) 05:54, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
I was listing more credible sources. For example the part that says it is credible list "cited by a number of scholars" Whereas the not credible say "pundits, politicians, and some of the designated groups" So scholars versus people who could have a bias against the SPLC for non factual reasons. That is not neutral. At all. I cited actual settlements that show they have paid millions as a result, not just people trying to discredit them falsely. I got that from the SPLC website. Actual court cases are far more credible than politicians and the people on the list. The Trump as a tool to gain donations, was in the washington post as a in depth look at both sides. The way it is now is clearly meant to show bias in their favor. Can we get the word scholar in the bottom paragraph as well? Or we just sticking to pundits. Because those are neutral statements. If you would like to type it so it is not clunky you are welcome to do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.108.111.75 (talk) 06:21, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Can you remove unreferenced genre? Thanks. 2402:1980:248:6D9E:E06C:ECE:B1A8:7720 (talk) 16:20, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello. At User talk:2607:FEA8:80A0:1270:6000:A09A:1CA2:E685 you accused me of using multiple IPs to vandalize You're a Superstar.
While I assume good faith, you're mistaken. I haven't used multiple IPs on the article. Further, I only use different IPs if dynamic assignments by my ISP change automatically over time.
Most importantly, I didn't vandalize the article. I added the article to Category:LGBT-related songs for the category for good reason. Sources that "You're a Superstar" is an LGBT-related song:
• https://www.metroweekly.com/2004/06/simone-denny/ | Lead vocalist on the song performs at a Pride fest and the song is highlighted. Clearly reliable source, website of a major print publication.
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKEamMpSnxM | Lead vocalist performs the song at the 2015 INSPIRE Awards, an awards show for the Toronto LGBT community. Performer introduces it as a familiar song and much of the audience sings along. It's clearly adopted as an LGBT anthem.
• https://yohomo.ca/blog/top-songs-by-queer-torontonians | Listed among "Top Queer Toronto Songs."
• https://itallstartswithasong.wordpress.com/2013/08/ Indirect maybe, but supporting evidence. The first-credited songwriter of "You're A Superstar" tells an interviewer from the Songwriters Association of Canada: "The gay community was a huge backbone globally for our records. Either we would release records for them and all of the DJs and the gay clubs would break them first before or they would crossover. It was like (Toronto radio station) CFNY to clubs. Gay clubs to straight clubs to mobile."
Thanks for your work to better Wikipedia!
--2607:FEA8:80A0:1270:6000:A09A:1CA2:E685 23:38, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi. We have been in a bit of a disagreement about the genres list of the song "My Heart Will Go On", and I think we should talk it out.
My first edit (link here) added the genres of pop, ballad, and soft rock, without me sourcing them. You reverted them. I should have sourced them, and I acknowledge my mistake.
My second edit (link here) re-added the genres from my first edits plus also adult contemporary, this time with sources. There was one source for pop and ballad (trackrecord), one source for soft rock (theawardsconnection), and one source for adult contemporary (rateyourmusic). You "trimmed" this, by removing everything except pop and its associated source.
My third edit (link here) reverted your trimming, as I believe you didn't state enough of a reason for why the genre list needed trimming. You re-revert and accuse me of genre warring. You say that theawardsconnection "does not say this song is soft rock", and that rateyourmusic is unreliable because of WP:ALBUMAVOID. As for theawardsconnection and genre warring, see the two next paragraphs. As for rateyourmusic being unreliable, I was not aware that it uses user-generated content or that it was specifically listed as an example of an unreliable source. I should have known that, and I acknowledge my mistake.
As for saying that theawardsconnection doesn't say the song is soft rock, it does say that. The paragraph starting with "Among Titanic's victories" goes on to say that "[My Heart Will Go On] is pretty much the epitome of '90s adult contemporary, a song that was all but impossible to avoid over the final years of the decade and which still garners heavy airplay on soft rock radio to this day". So theawardsconnection does refer to the song as soft rock. And the same sentence also calls it "the epitome of '90s adult contemporary", so theawardsconnection could feasibly be used as the source for re-adding "adult contemporary" to the genres list now that I know rateyourmusic is unreliable.
Please don't accuse me of genre or edit warring as I have not violated the three-revert rule. The 3RR forbids people from making more than three reverts in 24 hours, rather than three or more, so even if all my three edits were reverts I would not have passed the threshold. And of my edits, only the third was a revert while the first two were an addition and a re-addition.
To summarize: I think it was wrong of you to trim my second edit without explanation, and theawardsconnection does say the song is soft rock. However, I also made mistakes (first by adding genres without sourcing, and then by adding an unreliable source), and I apologize. I have left the article alone for now, and will not edit it for the foreseeable future unless we can reach an agreement. I hope we can resolve this issue and avoid further disagreement. Kind regards, 212.130.152.24 (talk) 09:14, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
please stop erasing my work. I have plenty of references, I nodded off for 2 hrs — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tillywilly17 (talk • contribs) 10:52, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
I am sorry I am still learning the little stuff the references I know, I nodded off for 2 hours! sir please i can only do so much at once sorry i am out of breath i don't know if i am doing this right thanks send me email if problem dave — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tillywilly17 (talk • contribs) 11:12, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
HiBinksternet. In order to be neutral, equal, and fair to all users involved, I also must warn you that you were engaging in edit warringonPinkerton (album) by reverting QuestFour in a back-and-fourth fashion without discussion. I know that this user was just blocked for edit warring only a day ago, but it doesn't mean that we can instantly discredit their edits, nor does it allow us to repeatedly revert QuestFour because they now have "a record". ;-) Please be careful with disputes like this in the future... I don't want to see you blocked over something silly like this. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:00, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
I present you with Brandnewflipflops. Also blocked 2601:680:c800:3fc4::/64. Graham87 04:48, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello Bink, I hope you are having a nice summer, you deserve it for being the responsable one and taking the role of sysop at that Tesla discussion. For me it has been very disapointing to see the indifference most others have been having, and, no doubts, it´s that lack of response and apparent tolerance that have been providing him motivation to continue like that. To me, this seems to be one real major problem, and I have been amaised to see that it has not been considered as such. A nationalistic POV-pusher in an extremelly sensitive area, the Balkans, where tolerance is already minimal, has been blocked and banned, however, he announced he has a program allowing him to alter his IP and subsequently evade blocks and bans, so he will be using it regardless of anything told and done. The ban was about 2 years ago and he has been editing activelly during the entire time. He recognises no authority, and is a vandal in its purest form, has no interest in improving Wikipedia, just introducing his POV. I tried to speak reasonably with him. He will not change and will also not give up. I was ignoring him for long, but that is not a solution, just as is not entering into edit-wars with him, and you saw by yourself how he restores his edits knowing its impossible to do him nothing. I honestly don´t know how to fill SPY reports, I refuse to loose time with that, that is not what Wikipedia should be about, and in that case I could learn to make SPY reports and would spend the entire day chasing him. Again, not a solution. I have been an editor for over a decade now and will probably edit for life, I love this project. I probably coudn´t, but anyway it was never my intention to be an admin, but I do feel very interested in the overall functioning of the project. In that sense, Asdisis case is by far the worst case of ban evasion I have ever seen, and one case which seems to have no solution. Is it possible? Can I help somehow? FkpCascais (talk) 18:47, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi Binksternet, you left me a warning here accusing me of both vandalism and of using multiple IP addresses; as a regular Wikia contributor I of course respect the need for warnings, but this one was very premature. I only made one edit to the Bauhaus page last night, not to vandalise but to make note of the band coming back together in November. Another anonymous user may have may have made the same edit as me, but that was not me making the same edit with another IP address. -- 94.209.223.183 (talk) 11:55, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mr._Bungle#The_Death_Metal_Strikes_Back. Lynchenberg (talk) 13:42, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
This is a neutral notice to all registered editors who have contributed to Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film over the past year (Sept. 15, 2018-present) that a Request for Comment has been posted here. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:59, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
What is this? You're on my talk page threatening to block me and you've outright deleted a segment of the Stallman article that four different people spent the day going back and forth about. The article's got citations and all the other jazz everyone was griping it didn't have when I started; if you have a nitpick with it it's your job to make it better, not outright annihilate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.24.39.178 (talk) 01:11, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
I'm not sure you how you convinced that semi-retired admin to leave the ominous and threatening "harassment" warning on my talk page, but you know full well that I've engaged in absolutely ZERO "purposeful and blatant" harassment of you. I only left you a boilerplate edit warring notice, as required. I'd suggest you review WP:AOHA, especially the part about false accusations. We're involved in a dispute, and apparently an edit war. Try to conduct yourself like an adult as we work through the dispute resolution process. Bullying me with false accusations of harassment isn't going to help your cause; shame on you for going there. Really disappointing. From now on, stay off my talk page and I'll stay off yours. Dharmabumstead (talk) 04:21, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Why are you reverting repeated edits listing Bauhaus as active in 2019, when in the very article it states the band is planning two shows in November? P.S. Those of us making these edits are not "deliberately introducing false information" or vandalizing, as you claim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.66.65.29 (talk) 07:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
If you want to report OneofJessieJheartbeat (talk · contribs) please file e new report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky. The report you added it to had already been acted on and closed. Cabayi (talk) 17:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
This is for your valuable efforts for countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 14:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC) |
Hi, is inclusion in the 2017 billboard latin music awards finalists enough to claim notability? Yomil y el Dany is supported only by that. Hydromania (talk) 00:40, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Your idea of “gobbledygook” is what the thing actually does. It doesn’t “blend” anything, the LO port chops the RF to IF port path flipping the polarity whenever the LO goes through a zero crossing. The ring of diodes doesn’t have to be diodes, they can be FETs anything that switches on/off, and it’s not a bridge diode drawn funny. The diode ring doesn’t actually actually have to be a ring, the mixer designed for AWACS in the 70’s arranged the balun transformers differently so all 4 diodes go to ground. For maintainability, they had to be in little bullet shaped packages under screw covers on the sides so they could be swapped out if damaged by an Electro-Magnetic Pulse. It’s nice that people who don’t understand the details can seize on the name of a component like “ring diode” and attach meaning to it. It’s not a good idea to think that it’s a substitute for actual knowledge.
You’re an audio engineer, which means that, like everyone else who hasn’t worked as an RF or microwave engineer, what you know about double balanced mixers comes from a half-accurate junk articles and stuff written by ham radio enthusiasts who are long on enthusiasm and short on details. I’m a Ph.D. E.E who did RF new product development, including a lot of RF hybrid double balanced mixers, the expensive ones that the Mini-Circuits cheapies pictured on the article page were designed from, back when that was the state of the art.
If you feel something more approachable would have made the content accessible, I agree.
If you think Wikipedia should remain a collection of ignorant twaddle written to keep ignorant fools just as they are, you’re doing a great job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PolychromePlatypus (talk • contribs)
Hey Bink. Could I ask you to check the source added here for me. It won't open on my PC but it could be my browser. FWIW, I'm pretty certain this is our old friend Gho$tkiller/Aerobicthyme/Methodmaster... Just waiting for them to drop their guard. Robvanvee 05:17, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Hey Bink, do you think your edits as pointed out above (the same date change) as well as this same date change and also this same date change not to mention this same date change (there are more but I don't want to bore you) might be cause for concern and a case for SPI or should I keep digging? There is also this from the latest suspect (examples 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) vs previous guilty parties (examples 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) Robvanvee 18:57, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I just saw you revert an edit that I took out earlier due to being unsourced and need some help. I was trying to fix the template but it either leaves a white space or the bar goes too far in that column. I don't know if it's a glitch or I'm just not doing something right. There is also something else in the template that is off. Please help! Thanks Someone in SoCal Area (talk) 17:33, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wacky Packages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drew Friedman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:17, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
I'm asking you because I know you're very dedicated to cleaning up articles and I don't know where else to go. I have reason to believe that I have come across somebody with several different IP accounts, one of which is blocked, and that they are the same person because their edits are very similar. Who do I go to with this? Rodericksilly (talk) 22:17, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/146.90.125.113
and this user
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/146.90.125.0
could be this blocked user
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/46.208.236.216
as they keep making the same edit to the page Jon Pertwee when I have advised them to to take it to the Talk page to discuss.
Thanks.
Rodericksilly (talk) 22:52, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello Binksternet. I received and read your messages regarding edits made to the articles titled "Elmer Valentine," "Eddie Rubin," and the other related articles. Correct me if I'm wrong but I think perhaps my mistake was not including detailed citations/references for the edits and contents I added to the aforementioned articles. I did not intend to promote or advertise anyone or anything, but rather to correct and add missing information to these articles. I am not related to any of these individuals and don't have any connections to them. I'm simply a music history major that enjoys contributing knowledge and facts to music related-articles. The following are replies to your messages:
Regrading the "Elmer Valentine" article, I don't understand why adding a band who performed at his nightclub is considered promotional and advertising material. I noticed there were famous bands already listed in the article that performed at the Whisky a Go Go, so why not add the band (Eddie Rubin & Johnny Rivers) that was the very first band to open the Whisky and start it's popularity? It is a well known fact, so I was just trying to enhance and improve the article. Why wouldn't the other bands listed in the article be considered promotional and advertising material? The point of Wikipedia is to collaborate and help to improve/add to articles with accurate and important information.
I noticed that Eddie Rubin was removed from the articles "Jazz drummers," "Venice High School," and that Johnny Rivers was removed from a few, but I can't understand why. There are plenty of other musicians listed in these articles, so how is it disruptive to add more?
Please let me know what I did wrong so that I don't make the same mistake in the future, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.241.123.228 (talk) 03:33, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Rubin is famous and well-known in musician circles. However, I read the guidelines and being famous isn't necessarily a requirement for a person to be mentioned in articles. There are a multitude of musicians written about on Wikipedia that are not household names. For example there is an article on a drummer named Mickey Jones, who was hired by Johnny Rivers to replace Eddie Rubin when Eddie went on to record with Neil Diamond and Ornette Coleman, but Mickey is not a famous and well-known musician. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.241.123.228 (talk) 01:59, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
I don't think you should be removing content like that. Why not split into separate lists, as the MoS suggests? Unless of course the list is too short to deserve an article.--Bageense(disc.) 19:39, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
There seems to be a lot of back and forth going on with the Latin trap article. I think maybe the article should be protected from edits by non-registered users. What do you think?--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 20:28, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Binksternet, I'm not sure why you are removing the 6Years sock strike outs. The confirmed IP was already blocked as of August. So the entire time 6Years was editing was a block evasion. I do get that Dumuzid wasn't a sock. That was a mistaken strike. From the SPI admin comments, In my opinion, 6YearsTillRetirement is clearly the account created by the IP editor 73.76.220.8 after being advised to do so by GoodDay, and based on the long history of obsessions with sockpuppets on Facebook and of a conspiracy of administrators catering to white supremacists, as well as personal attacks in general, I believe this is the same editor I blocked way back in March (for personal attacks and block evasion) and was blocked again in July (for personal attacks), and is currently blocked by a checkuser, a block which 6YearsTillRetirement is evading. Basically since 6Years is 73.76.220.8 their whole edit history is an evasion. Springee (talk) 00:38, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
How is the reference I provided not enough proof? It shows the part of the album cover, and the shirt of the actual event which happened at the store and even shows one of the band members wearing that shirt from the event. The photographic proof alone should warrant it being a credible source that it is a reference to that establishment. It is not a typical source such as a news article, but the photographic evidence alone is strong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.196.242.206 (talk • contribs)
Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information about a user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's harassment policy. Wikipedia policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted and/or suppressed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors may result in you being blocked from editing. Pudeo (talk) 16:21, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
He writes autobiographically– this is not true, writing some unsourced information about an organization does not mean it's written autobiographically.
Photos showed him involved in anti-abortion activism– incorrect, photographing a protest would not necessarily mean this. The AE report is heading for a boomerang based on-wiki stuff. Real life does not matter and using someone's affiliations as an ad hominem is considered a personal attack. --Pudeo (talk) 17:29, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Ok, let me clear this up real quick: The CUA connection is publicly declared on-wiki, so that's fine. The rest of what you are saying is original research by you based on speculation from their contribution history. You can draw your own conclusions in your mind but you can't state them as facts on-wiki. So please, don't do that again. I did not strike any part of anyone's comments except yours, but all intervening revisions had to be suppressed to remove your speculation. And I've had to do so again here. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:25, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
After follow-up discussion with members of the oversight team, I have restored the redacted portion of your remarks. Suppression is considered a "tool of first resort" to be used to protect users, since we are easily able to reverse the process. It turns out there was an on-wiki declaration that supported your removed claims. However, I should note that what we found was not what you were citing as evidence, and that were that the only evidence to be found this would still be suppressible outing. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:08, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Bink
Could you check whether 82.13.100.94, who edited the Jon Pertwee page today, is 146.90.125.0? Because the latter has a block extending to 30 March 2020.
Thanks.
Rodericksilly (talk) 17:47, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Ha! Seems we were doing the same thing. I'll leave you to it. Robvanvee 16:30, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Regarding this filing. What is the giveaway that 86.160.157.43 (talk · contribs) is User:HarveyCarter? Something about 'erroneously'? If the HarveyCarter connection is not certain, there might still be a case for semiprotecting the Muammar Gaddafi article. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 01:44, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
I've just restored the Underworld Unleashed article to what it was before this got started, and even removed two things in it just now and restored another one a while back (thanks for your help with the last one and please know - I mean it).
Is there a reason why you've altered it (and continue to do so)? If you'll look at the View history section, I've explained where I got my information for my contributions to this article. No one has even complained about it...until now. Please explain, as I'm very confused here. Thank you.Malcolmlucascollins (talk) 03:14, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
I can see where you're coming from, I think, but could you allow one concession and put back the missing supervillains that I put into the section Villains who rejected Neron's offer?
That's what got me started on my contributions in the first place, because I figured that they were part of the story (albeit a brief one) and, as a result, shouldn't be ignored. I used three major DC websites to get this information:
What I did the ones that were not known to have refused is mark them with an asterisk. Hope that helps.
Also, if you look on the Talk page of the article, there are two supervillains whose names are unknown to me (and one of them was shown rejecting the offer). If you could please help me out on this, that would be great! Thank you.Malcolmlucascollins (talk) 18:45, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
UPDATE: Never mind, I see that all of the lists have all been removed. Thanks anyway, though.Malcolmlucascollins (talk) 19:00, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for telling me; I didn't know that.Malcolmlucascollins (talk) 23:29, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
There has been a debate about the genres in the article [3] [4] do to this source [5], these genres were added before more reviews of this album came out. I just wondering should we remove the source and replace it with a source explain the genres better? TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 01:27, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
I dont know anything about talk pages so I hope I'm doing this correctly and you get the msg...
The Youtube song (Call me by my Government) from Jayo Felony's latest album "James Savage" reveals his actual birthdate when his mother speaks on the song at 8 seconds. (Not to mention I know him personally)
I tried to post a link to the song but Wikipedia says the link is on a blacklist...
Vmf863 (talk) 06:49, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Steve
Vmf863
I enjoyed reading your autobiographical comments. Usually I don't enjoy such comments on User Pages. I agree with your idea, presumably expressed long ago, that everyone who wants to contribute to Wikipedia ought to register and create an account. This would nearly eliminate vandalism and solve a lot of problems. Why do you think this idea has never been tried? I've been thinking about it. Legal reasons? That's always a good default answer. That, and "money". Or is it promotional, i.e. "Anyone can edit Wikipedia... anyone at all ...woo hoo!" Of course, why should anyone be a writer and editor? People are different. Why we do insist in assuming they can be dentical? Not everyone was meant to be a doctor or computer programmer or solider. Why we do assume that anyone can? Not everyone can be an editor or writer. Such a claim misses what those people actually do and what their qualifications are.
–Vmavanti (talk) 15:20, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Dear Binksternet, hope you are keeping well and that work is not too demanding. Off to southern Spain tomorrow for a couple of weeks, including a brief stay in Ronda where I shall search out the Great Accumulator’s main inspiration. I’d like to push the castle towards FA when I get back. If a collaboration still works for you, would November/December be a suitable time to complete the History? If it doesn’t, I absolutely understand - times change. Just let me know. KJP1 (talk) 20:18, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello.
I replied to your message on my talk page, but then it occurred to me that you might not see what I said, so I decided to come to yours.
I had actually already reached out to the editor that deleted my edits prior to restoring them. The only reason for my having restored them in the end is that I spoke to him about the matter on his talk page and we came to an agreement which stated that my original edits had been - on the whole - correct. I now see that you have reverted them all over again.
Thank you for warning me about the three strikes rule. I was unaware of it. I shall therefore wait for the mandatory twenty-four hours, then - if you have no further objections - restore the edits that I made.
Yours sincerely,
O.
O.ominirabluejack (talk) 04:31, 10 October 2019 (UTC)O.ominirabluejack
Heya, did you see my followup on the Catholicism and homosexuality talk page? I was curious about what you're reading as firm condemnation, since I very much don't see it. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:39, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Binksternet. I would just like to tell you something. I'm a huge Chuck Jones fan, and all I was trying to do was put and retain good faith edits to the fellow fans who love his work. I'm not Mr Jack Marley from Maryland as you may have mistaken me for. Yes, I did do music edits too, but like I said, I do it for good faith. I apologize for the inconvenience, and I hope we can put this behind us. If you would like me to help you look for this user, I would be glad to help. Just make sure to keep my edits on who directed and wrote Adventures of the Road Runner on the Wile E. Coyote and the Road Runner page, since Maurice Noble and Tom Ray were co-directors, and Chuck Jones wrote part of the movie (it even says it at the beginning of the film). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:147:4001:1AA0:6453:667B:8440:4897 (talk) 20:57, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:40, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
I was on Wikipedia and had to fix every error made in the Chuck Jones section of the Tom and Jerry filmography. Some idiot went and put random directors credits for the wrong cartoons and completely removed The Mouse from H.U.N.G.E.R. with this fake cartoon called extinct puss. I fixed it now, but if anyone messes with that sort of section again, I'll let you know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.135.4.140 (talk) 23:46, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Hey would you be able to weigh in at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LIM (rapper)? The article I nominated was a vandalized version, the original might pass WP:SINGER #2. I have no idea how to read a French music chart listing. Thanks, Hydromania (talk) 05:12, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
I didn't edit that article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 54.38.145.209 (talk) 07:58, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Strateguy. I am quite new to this editing thing, but as far as I know, associated acts include those that have collaborated with the artist multiple times (which Young Thug and Lil Baby have) and they are also friends, aren't they? Strateguy (talk) 15:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
of the same behaviors you are engaged in. You can see the material you added has been disputed by others yet you restored it. Going to the talk page is good but not too cast aspersions. Springee (talk) 05:00, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Someone just completely removed at least 6000 words of information in the Wile E. Coyote and Road Runner page, and replaced it with already mentioned and fake articles. This user already had the only warning that Wikipedia was giving him, which means needs to be blocked for the sake of humanity. -NTS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:147:4001:1AA0:58E1:D7CF:7958:E50D (talk) 20:34, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. I'm glad this is being taken care of. I agree. Duck Soup doesn't exist, and he replaced the descriptions of Wile E. Coyote's encounters with Bugs Bunny with words that reference the titles of their cartoons and nothing more. They aren't even links in an organized order. The only short Wile E. appeared in with Daffy Duck was Superior Duck, and it was only a cameo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.135.4.140 (talk) 01:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
US Banknote Contest | ||
---|---|---|
November-December 2019 | ||
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here |
Sent by ZLEAat23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)
Hi Bink
I have multiple sources but my question is do you want ALL of the sources or ONLY the best for each???
1. UB40 Red Red Wine. Here are a bunch of sources for this The Slate and Twitter are both podcasts Its listed in Fred Bronson's The Billboard Book of Number 1 Hits http://www.slate.com/articles/podcasts/culturegabfest/2017/04/how_red_red_wine_by_ub40_became_an_unlikely_hit.html https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/hip-hop/8472113/ub40-red-red-wine-labour-of-love https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/music/red-red-wine-revisited-the-ub40-phoenix-connection-6615296 https://counteract.co/features/beginners-guide-to-ub40/ https://www.songfacts.com/facts/ub40/red-red-wine https://nj1015.com/dons-top-10-from-september-13-1988/ https://twitter.com/javajoel?lang=en
2.Glenn Medeiros "Nothing's Gonna Change My Love for You": There are a few sources for my information some of this information is on other sources. Jay Stone was the producer(and program director of the radio talent contest) and I was the radio executive listed in the article. The last link below is where Jay Stone quits his job at KIKI to produce Glenn
https://www.revolvy.com/page/Glenn-Medeiros http://popcultureaddictlifeguide.blogspot.com/2015/10/artist-spotlight-glenn-medeiros.html https://wikivisually.com/wiki/Glenn_Medeiros https://americanradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Business/Music/Archive-RandR-IDX/IDX/80s/87/RR-1987-04-03-OCR-Page-0026.pdf#search=%22glenn medeiros story%22 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guy Zapoleon (talk • contribs) 12:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
I suspect that a HarveyCarter sockpuppet is screwing with Spain during World War II, very similar style of writing and arguments.... --Havsjö (talk) 09:04, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
And what a beautiful place it is. The Puente Nuevo really is something special. In a very odd twist, I learnt that Orson Welles' ashes are interred on an estate just outside, that used to belong to a matador friend of his. An inspiration to both Hearst and his nemesis! So, to the castle. How do you want to approach it? I think the art/architecture is pretty much covered, although it will benefit greatly from the peer review. Thus, as we discussed previously, we need an expanded History section. I don't think it needs to be too long, as the article's about the estate, not Hearst. I think we'd need to cover something like:
How does that sound? I've no idea of your on/off Wiki commitments at present. If it would help, I could sketch out something on these lines, drop it in and you could rework? Or you may have done it already? Just let me know. I think if we could push it to PR sometime in November, we've have a good chance of getting to FAC pre-Christmas. I note, as an aside, that Julia M's birthday was 20 January, and the day of her death, 2 February. Assuming all goes well, a TFA appearance on either of those dates would be quite a nice tribute. Let me know how you want to play it. All the very best. KJP1 (talk) 11:56, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Please, put do noy delete again my conributes, you can't accuse me of choosing only the negative aspects of their losses against German fighters. If you knew the book you would see that I reported only what is written (and not everything) about the first clashes in Tunisia. There was nothing written about being engaged in ground attack missions. If you know it you can add this data and not delete mine. Otherwise, your intervention may take the form of vandalism. Thanks. --Gian piero milanetti (talk) 06:53, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Hola Binksternet! I hope you are keeping well. So, I think I'm done on the Enchanted Hill for now. If you have time, I'd really appreciate you taking a look. I'm (rarely!) precious with collaborations, so feel free to change things you think need changing without referencing back. Specifics I'd really appreciate input on include:
Give me a shout if you want to discuss. If we can look to push it to PR in mid-Nov., I think 20 January might be achievable, if a little tight. All the very best. KJP1 (talk) 13:52, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Pages: Mike Stone (record producer), Mike D. Stone, Clay Records, Clay Records discography, Mike "Clay" Stone
I would bring this to WikiProject:Record Labels but it doesn't seem very active, so hoping you can do something with this. Seems there were three Mike Stones who worked in record producing. One of them worked at Clay Records. Clay records has two unsourced articles which should probably be merged (someone tagged them with improperly formatted merge proposal templates) and then either sourced or AfD'd. In theory any mention of Mike Stone of clay records can just redirect to Clay records. Problem is, Mike "Clay" Stone was deleted as an implausible redirect to Mike Stone (record producer) (which doesn't seem correct). The delete means there are ~50 redlinks to Mike of clay which should really point to one of three pages, and I'm not sure the various editor(s) who originally linked them were linking the correct mike. Care to try to unravel it all? Hydromania (talk) 00:20, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you erased some information about the crew that worked on cartoon shorts a few hours ago. I will admit, I am sorry for not using any resources for the credits. The thing I'm ticked off about is that you claim I'm Mr.JackMarley, when I in fact am not. You might remember me as the person who worked on the music articles as well, when you claim I was that user & I got blocked from editing Wikipedia for 3 months. Please note: I meant no harm, I apologize for no original research, & I hoped that cleared up about who I am. -NTS, Anonymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:147:4001:1AA0:6037:8E8D:859A:64A5 (talk) 02:18, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Well, I have started to add resources. I do truly apologize for this. I just get excited about information and put it down without second thought. I'm a huge Ben Washam and Chuck Jones freak, too. I'm also interested in music. The point is, there's a lot of stuff I have to do and I don't realize that I'm messing up until it's all deleted. You may note on 3 cartoons I added a resource for each on the state of proof. I will start citing from now on. Once again, for the 4,000th time, I'm truly sorry if I messed with your day. Enjoy the evening! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:147:4001:1AA0:7C61:CEF6:798F:F9D9 (talk) 03:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello. You had deleted research & proof that Chuck Jones was a writer of Duel Personality. Michael Maltese didn't write it by himself, & I can prove it. Meet me at the page in 10 minutes, then tell what you think afterwards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:147:4001:1AA0:80CF:6BC0:A250:5F9 (talk) 02:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, you once again deleted important proof that Chuck Jones was a co-writer for Duel Personality. In fact, his name was credited before Michael Maltese. I even put a reference link. Also, there's an article on Don Towsley the animator. The link that people click is that of a technician or something. I'm fixing those links to verify it. Please don't interfere on a situation like that! You're messing up good things that help people, & when there's clearly evidence at the table! -NTS, Anonymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.135.4.140 (talk) 21:08, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Here is the wonderful & helpful link unreference for you to see for yourself! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-qz8ifq3l1o -NTS, Anonymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.135.4.140 (talk) 21:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
I can't make a jpeg image correctly. Could you delete the one for Jerry Jerry Quite Contrary and show me how? -NTS, Anonymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:147:4001:1AA0:EC15:DBF0:D987:1338 (talk) 00:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Oh, sorry. I had already deleted before I went to bed and you went to check it. Is there still a way you could tell me what to do? It's the title card, and it actually looks great for the next decade. Let me send a link. https://tomandjerry.fandom.com/wiki/Jerry,_Jerry,_Quite_Contrary?file=Jerry%2C_Jerry%2C_Quite_Contrary_Title_Card.jpg -NTS, Anonymous
I'm afraid you misunderstood my intent! My placing the uncited section template at the start of the lead section was meant to convey that the lead section was (and still is!) entirely bereft of citations. I didn't mean to imply that the article lacked citations, but I can see how it might have been interpreted that way. Is there a better way to mark a lead section as lacking citations? If so, I apologize – I was unaware. I do, however, take umbrage at your characterization of my edit as "nonsense". Aren't we supposed to assume good faith? I feel that even a cursory glance at my contribution history would demonstrate that I am not, in fact, a vandal. Perhaps the fault is mine for making my intention unclear, but I feel that "nonsense" is a little uncalled for! PaulodiCapistrano 07:16, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Sharyl Attkisson#RfC on self-sourcing. Inviting you as a previous RfC discussion participant at Talk:Sharyl Attkisson and/or contributing editor of Sharyl Attkisson. Doug Mehus T·C 14:52, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |