![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello! Your submission of An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! WJ94 (talk) 12:07, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
As it stands, while you've been the only person brave enough to write an article on the subject, just obfuscates the subject more than a couple paragraphs in the incel article 108.44.212.160 (talk) 17:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seongsu Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Han River. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
If you ever consider to create Wikidata items for the two SS founders under their real names or mention them in the SS wikidata item i please urge you to consult the local community before doing so to avoid controversy. Kind regards Trade (talk) 02:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I spent about 10 hours continuously expanding the Sanctioned Suicide article, while trying to keep as much of your writing in as possible, as well as your article structure. Please take a look at it and keep whatever you like as it is your article, thanks, I am now going to bed and will probably no longer check on the article. I think this is the most anyone will expand it in a long time as I looked in every corner and added what I felt improves the article even more. Thanks for working on the article with me, I don't want to join wikipedia, but thanks for creating the article. 2600:4040:4030:5000:9C9A:4DD6:D74A:DDF4 (talk) 10:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
The article Seongsu Bridge disaster you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Seongsu Bridge disaster and Talk:Seongsu Bridge disaster/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 03:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Moved to Talk:Korean wave
The article Seongsu Bridge disaster you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Seongsu Bridge disaster for comments about the article, and Talk:Seongsu Bridge disaster/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 20:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
You have recently been editing gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Sideswipe9th (talk) 20:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
On15 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Seongsu Bridge disaster, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after the Seongsu Bridge collapsed (pictured) in Seoul, radiographic testing found that 110 of the 111 connections in the bridge were filled with defects? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Seongsu Bridge Disaster. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Seongsu Bridge disaster), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 16,086 views (1,340.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2023 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Dear Freedom, Your merge request was perfectly in order, as this page is precisely for request that are yet to be discussed. So feel free to repost it at any time, and it will be dealt with by one of us from WikiProject Merge in due course. Felix QW (talk) 13:40, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
On19 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gangnam (Seoul), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the rapid development of the region of Gangnam (pictured) in Seoul was spurred by the 1968 North Korean assassination attempt on military dictator Park Chung-hee? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gangnam (Seoul). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gangnam (Seoul)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
On19 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dokdo Is Our Land, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the melody of "Dokdo Is Our Land" is commonly used by South Korean students as a study tool? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dokdo is Our Land. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dokdo Is Our Land), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
On26 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital was considered unusual for introducing the three volumes of Karl Marx's Capital? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hey! Sorry for the much delayed responses on the first two rounds of your GA review—I realized that I had failed to put the GA review on my watch page, so I didn't notice when you added comments to it.--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 16:05, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello!
First of all—I'm sorry the tone of the discussion at the talk page got, IMO, unduly contentious and personal. That may have been my fault: I failed to properly publicize the RFC, and given that I didn't have strong feelings on the category, I essentially created a situation in which only two editors were forced to debate back and forth. I hadn't called for an RFC before, and, to be totally honest, I didn't realize much publication would be necessary. I've since posted notices of the RFC on the talk pages of each of the categories in question, the talk page of the mass shooting category, the Village Pump miscellaneous page, the "no original research" noticeboard, and Wikipedia talk:Categorization.
Second, I just wanted to check in and see if there was anything else related to your Good Article review that you'd like to discuss or have me address. I completely understand if you'd like to wait for the RFC to finish to finish your review, but just in case you'd like me to do some work in the meantime, I thought I'd check.--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 14:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Good morning!, I saw your edit here—and I realize that it might not reflect great on me that I invited a sock puppet editor to contribute to a pretty evenly split discussion. I just want to assure you that I only invited the user because I saw that user's edit on the page related to the "part of" component of the infobox, and I was a bit desperate for additional voices. In the future, I'll be far more careful about pinging editors I don't know into a discussion.--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 12:50, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Per MOS:TVNOW, all TV shows are referred to in the present tense. Please do not change it to "was" as you did with this edit [1]. Thank you. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:54, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to Freedom4U for copy edits totaling over 20,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE March 2023 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 01:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC) |
Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 3rd Place | ||
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Freedom4U for copyediting 4 long articles during the GOCE March 2023 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 01:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC) |
Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Longest Article, 2nd Place | ||
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Freedom4U for copyediting one of the five longest articles – 20,205 words – during the GOCE March 2023 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 01:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC) |
The article An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital and Talk:An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bilorv -- Bilorv (talk) 21:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
On7 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Basic Medicine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Basic Medicine features North Korean propaganda? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Basic Medicine. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Basic Medicine), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Just letting you know that after you opposed the PROD on Jo Young-nam, I have decided to nominate for deletion via AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jo Young-nam. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 16:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
@Freedom4U, Need your valuable vote here. Beadrill (talk) 11:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Hey, good work on uploading the 70s/80s images here to Commons, I stumbled upon on the one on the June Struggle page earlier after looking at it on my past contribs and after finding them I decided to try and categorize some of them properly to make them more accessible. Totalibe (talk) 20:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
The article An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital for comments about the article, and Talk:An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bilorv -- Bilorv (talk) 18:22, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
I just wanted to say thanks for giving it another shot on getting the articles moved. It was dispiriting to see that the discussion proceeded more or less as last time and that if enough people make anecdotal assertions it beats well evidenced arguments. It's just the nature of Wikipedia I suppose. ThessalonianR (talk) 13:56, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Hey,
Thanks for your contributions on Korea-related articles, they're seriously so good!
I have a question: do you have any thoughts on what should be done with RR/MR romanization before 1945? Currently the MOS and the Naming convention pages contradict each other. MOS says RR, naming convention says RR.
What do you think? I'm personally unsure; it gets even greyer for 20th century Koreans, which is my main interest. toobigtokale (talk) 18:33, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Freedom4U. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.
Useful links:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:19, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello Freedom4U,
I see that you have tagged the List of Core 2, i3, i5, i7, i9 articles with external links, lack of references, and too much detail notices. Well, could you have a look at the thread I've created at Talk:List of Intel Core processors#Table redesign and participate if you have anything to say? The "too much detail" caught my eye a bit there, as a number of my planned changes in the post-merge List of Intel Core article go over removing excessive detail and duplicate information, to improve readability and accessibility of the tables, and reduce their data footprints so the PEIS limit issue is significantly mitigated.
Sidenote: as it says in the It has been suggested that this article be merged notice at the top of Intel Core articles, the Core 2, i3, i5, i7, i9 articles are actually currently in the process of being merged into the List of Intel Core processors article, per the linked discussion, and so when everything's done and cleaned up on that article, the i3 i5 i7 list articles vice versa will be turned into redirects, so please keep that in mind. — AP 499D25 (talk) 05:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Because your signature is "F4U", and it's at the top of your user page, and you use it on Discord, I suggest you make a doppelganger account for it. AntiSpoof currently blocks it because User:F4u exists, but you can request the account be made at Wikipedia:Request an account. Snowmanonahoe (talk · contribs · typos) 20:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi, would you mind adding the WP:Sockstrike to 'contributions' by User:Mureungdowon on both Talk:Liberal conservatism and Talk:Conservative liberalism please?--Autospark (talk) 15:43, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Racecraft at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! WJ94 (talk) 13:55, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gangnam you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Praseodymium-141 -- Praseodymium-141 (talk) 12:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi! I started a draft for Karen Fields. Based upon her work, I think she meets notability as an author. Thought you might be interested. Best, Thriley (talk) 01:39, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Basic Medicine you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 23:03, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
The article Basic Medicine you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Basic Medicine for comments about the article, and Talk:Basic Medicine/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 18:41, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
On10 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Racecraft, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the book Racecraft argues that the concept of human races was developed to justify racism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Racecraft. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Racecraft), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
You moved a couple of station articles to capitalized Station, without explaining why these would be different from most other Korean stations. Are they in fact special that way? Dicklyon (talk) 00:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
I saw your relist at Masala chai , and noticed that you had added the note at the end of the discussion. Relist notes are added right after the nominator's sign on the nomination post, and if necessary, a relisting comment can be added at the bottom of the discussion if you want to give specific advice to those discussing. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 09:15, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
안녕하세요?혹시 한국인이신가요?
South Korea in the Korean War 지금 이 문서7월10일에 만들어서 계속 확장 중인데 왜 삭제를 신청하신거죠?
느긋하게 지켜 봐 주시길 부탁드리고 영어와 한국어 네이티브급이라고 쓰여져 있던데 문서 확장하는데 동참해 주시면 더더욱 감사하겠습니다. Footwiks (talk) 04:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
왜 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard에 신고하신거죠? Gloucester Hill Battle Monument 문서에 있는 내용을 United Kingdom in the Korean War에 넣었다고 신고하신건가요?
저의 위키백과 활동을 일일히 조사해서 신고하시는지 이해가 안 가네요. 제가 무슨 기분 나쁘게 했었나요?Footwiks (talk) 11:05, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Medical support in the Korean War와 United Kingdom in the Korean War 그리고 Korean War 문서 비교는 해 보시고 삭제 신청을 하시는 것인가요?
제가 '통계로 본 6.25 전쟁' 토대로 영어 위키백과에 없던 정보로 새롭게 만든 문서들입니다. Footwiks (talk) 11:45, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
The article Sanctioned Suicide you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sanctioned Suicide for comments about the article, and Talk:Sanctioned Suicide/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kate the mochii -- Kate the mochii (talk) 01:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
See my latest move discussion at Talk:Slava Ukraini#Requested move 22 July 2023. 2001:4451:824F:B700:541B:9433:F4CB:52ED (talk) 15:37, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi Freedom4U. You recently nominated Sanctioned Suicide for GA status. Unfortunately, because the reviewer was a sockpuppet editing in violation of their ban, their review is not valid. You may re-nominate the article for GA status if you wish. ––FormalDude (talk) 17:38, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sanctioned Suicide you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 20:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Freedom4U,
I noticed that you did some page moves with this Twitter/X mess and this talk page archive ended up at this title but Talk:X, Inc. is a redirect, not a talk page. Should this be moved to by a talk page archive for Talk:X Corp.? Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 19:35, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
The article Sanctioned Suicide you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sanctioned Suicide for comments about the article, and Talk:Sanctioned Suicide/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 03:42, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi Freedom4U,
Thank you so so so so much for helping me with my graduate student employee union article. Everything looks perfect now!! I am so very grateful, I was really up the creek and you bailed me out. THANK YOU!
Sincerely,
AJ— Preceding unsigned comment added by AJVincelli (talk • contribs) 21:10, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gangnam you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 12:42, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Very sorry to keep you waiting; it's been a stressful week at work. I also had an article that just finished its run on the Main Page as the lead DYK hook, so I was busy checking revisions from other users. I have much more free time now, so I'm returning to your DYK nomination. Edge3 (talk) 02:35, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Sanctioned Suicide has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 12:39, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The article HeadOn you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HeadOn and Talk:HeadOn/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 06:21, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
The article HeadOn you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HeadOn for comments about the article, and Talk:HeadOn/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 23:50, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Women Philosophers in the Long Nineteenth Century at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – Teratix ₵ 03:16, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Freedom4U.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around! Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 19:25, 10 August 2023 (UTC) |
On16 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sanctioned Suicide, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the decision to report the name of an internet forum dedicated to suicide was described by journalist Megan Twohey as one of the "biggest ethical issues that we had ever dealt with"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sanctioned Suicide. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sanctioned Suicide), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 18,080 views (753.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2023 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi Freedom4U. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:50, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
On22 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article HeadOn, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a commercial for HeadOn drew comparisons to Maoist posters, North Korean propaganda, and Hillary Clinton? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/HeadOn. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, HeadOn), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The article Gangnam you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Gangnam for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 17:23, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
On6 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Incheon Station, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the rights to build Incheon Station in the Korean Empire were temporarily given to an American company in an attempt to protect it from the Empire of Japan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Incheon Station. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Incheon Station), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The Minor Barnstar | ||
We really appreciate your efforts to review GANs. During the drive, the backlog of unreviewed nominations reduced by 440 articles, an astonishing 69 percent. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
On10 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Women Philosophers in the Long Nineteenth Century, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one reviewer for Women Philosophers in the Long Nineteenth Century was let down by the book's lack of poetry? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Women Philosophers in the Long Nineteenth Century. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Women Philosophers in the Long Nineteenth Century), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello Freedom4U,
Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google ScholarorScopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Wikipedia:WHYDOWEALWAYSSLINKTORANDOMONESENTENCEESSAYSWESHOULDPROBABLYSTOPTHATANDJUSTSAYWHATWEMEAN has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 25 § Wikipedia:WHYDOWEALWAYSSLINKTORANDOMONESENTENCEESSAYSWESHOULDPROBABLYSTOPTHATANDJUSTSAYWHATWEMEAN until a consensus is reached. 92.40.192.197 (talk) 13:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello Freedom4U:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by ageorother categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
I need to discuss why if depreciated |religion=
parameter for South Korean presidents in Talk:President of South Korea#Religion. 177.93.51.210 (talk) 23:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
You're no fun. RoySmith (talk) 02:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi Freedom4U. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:35, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |