|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 250 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Do you have any views on Gatton, Surrey whether it is worthy of its own article?
Consider: we already have Gatton (UK Parliament constituency) for when it was a famed Rotten Borough.
If you wish to make use of this wiki feel free (OR etc allowed). Jackiespeel (talk)
Faridah was a pupil whilst I was at school. We were in the same year
Hello, can you take a look at your revertonCroyland Chronicle. The time spans now overlap with 2 ending in 1486. Keith D (talk) 21:47, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hey, just noticed you reverted me on Old Palace School. You said "no need to shout". That's the official name on the register. For context, it's not always caps on the website. — MATRIX! (a good person!)[citation unneeded] 21:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I've added some more discussion to your post about Nayyar's nationality, since it seems to be a rather contentious topic and it doesn't seem like there was much discussion happened after you made your post. Clear Looking Glass (talk) 05:12, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vi et armis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King's peace.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, the {{Nowrap}} template threw me off. Steel1943 (talk) 00:29, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Just to finish the edit summary (which saved too early): (B) It's WP:PRIMARY at best and hardly high quality regardless of the Self-pub (C) it's entirely unnecessary in the lead (D) I'm not going to spend time unpicking what's ok and what's not in a defective edit (D) Per WP:BRD take it to talk if you disagree. Thanks. DeCausa (talk) 00:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Just saw this article go past on my watchlist again and I'm still a bit puzzled by the infobox image. Any thoughts on my response at Talk:Alexithymia#Infobox image, where I missed your initial ping? Belbury (talk) 12:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply