Iscargra

Dear Iscargra,

Thank you for helping with editing the wikipedia page of the Macedonian writer Ivan Čapovski. I appreciate your contributions and help to improve the quality of the page. This page has been originally published on the Macedonian Wikipedia https://mk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Иван_Чаповски by other editors, long before my contributions. I have mainly translated the existing Macedonian wiki page into English as the writer Ivan Čapovski's work has been translated into English. Fortunately there have been few editors who have contributed to the the development and quality of his English wiki page. My question is in relation to the 'neutral point of view' placed in a COI box. Can you please suggest how can this page improve in this regard? Many thanks for your advice, Srebrena (talk) 00:20, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sure thing! I am glad that I helped in some way on this page. I primarily do copyediting, and saw that this page was in need of grammar edits and an infobox, and so I added one and did some grammar edits. In relation to the COI box, I merely saw that it was removed and there was no discussion on the talk page, so I added it back. If you feel that the page is neutral and that your declared COI does not affect the neutrality of the article, feel free to remove it, or let me know if you need me to, as I'd be more than happy to help. Iscargra (talk) 15:47, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dear Iscargra, I am very grateful for all your help and contributions with editing the Ivan Capovski's page. In relation to the COI box, I would feel most comfortable if you are able to remove it. Many thanks in advance!Srebrena (talk) 10:08, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the COI notice. I am glad we managed to get this issue sorted out. Thanks for translating the page, and good luck with any future editing! Iscargra (talk) 04:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply