 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Jezhotwells has not edited Wikipedia since 17 February 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
 | Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:
|
|
|
|
1 Dec 2008—Nov 2009 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}}or{{ygm}} template.
The Soxaholix, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
Multiple sequence alignment has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Compliance requirements has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (trout me!) 10:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
John W. Campbell has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:33, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
McLaughlin Planetarium has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
