|
please stop the requests! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dthomsen8 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
I have noticed that on many pages of wikipedia there are so many external link directing to youtube channel videos , my question is are they allowed to that? if yes than when i added my link it was deleted after 2 days but other links remain same .what is the reason behind? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sitwatjabeen (talk • contribs) 10:49, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
You keep beating me to reverting vandals and such. Very quick on the draw, lol. Xtat1c (talk) 14:20, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Don't do that, please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.137.174.145 (talk) 15:14, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
I was actually trying to do the same as you, remove the rather rude edit. (As you can tell by my IP, Im fairly new to this...) so thanks for helping me out! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.15.119 (talk) 22:29, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
thank you for stopping me sorry for wasting your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a00:23c7:8c82:3001:69cc:672e:67d7:59b1 (talk) 22:51, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hello Naypta,
I find Mattythewhite to be quite a racist username, promoting white supremacy, which is very much against modern day beliefs. Could there be a chance of a name change to something, I don't know, more discreet.
All the best,
Have — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:c7f:a8a1:5700:bd65:1db0:9421:a98c (talk) 23:08, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
stop requests.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 13:52, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I made some editions to Wedding of Crown Prince Pavlos and Marie-Chantal Miller, that you paused. I bring some links and hope they can be used. As I am Danish Royal Family Fan, I read a lot about them and partially about their cousins and so on.
Yesterday did Marie-Chanta herself send this message at Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/p/CCF_k3MnDgk/?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet) because of her 25-years wedding day, where she mentioned their wedding florist Rob van Helden (in original English wiki-article only Erik Bering is mentioned, though from Danish royal magasin BilledBladet (https://www.billedbladet.dk/kongelige/graekenland/25-aars-kongelig-kaerlighed-kronprins-pavlos-og-marie-chantal-fejrer) and from Danish Queen Marghrethe's book and movie about Queen Ingrid (https://www.dr.dk/bonanza/serie/432/dronning-til-alle-ti/65915/dronning-til-alle-tider-66-dronning-ingrid-som-blomsterdronning) is known, that bridal bouqet is made of 125 petal of roses--and myrtle flowers, grown by Queen Ingrid.
Erik Bering has been Danish Royal florist for decades and still indirectly is,though he enjoys his otium and letting Bjarne Als running the business.
Rob van Helden has been young and upcoming florist then in 1995, Dutch-born, only three years in London high society by that time, he got no permission to make bridal bouqet in 1995, but with this wedding of prince Pavlos he came into royal circles and began his way as royal florist in England. His last royal wedding was princess Eugene's at 2018.
Best regards, Polina S. Rasmussen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.241.129.168 (talk) 12:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
I want to add an article Napoleon Wal Mahrousa It's in my Sandbox --John Adam é (talk) 16:11, 4 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
But my thing back up u Bushz (talk) 16:28, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
FYI. I have posted this new section about my continued concern. I am more than happy to help you fix what I still believe is a bug:
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
Changes later this week
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
20:18, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Yapperbot off, please, I am not responding to those requests.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 00:49, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
I changed Neil Oliver's nationality to British, rather than Scottish. Half of the population are offended by his British Nationalism and overt support for racist historian David Starkey, so while it might be true that he is Scottish, it's also true that he identifies more with the word British. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.243.171.114 (talk) 15:28, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
I don't know what you were trying, but querying for that partial blocks data was pretty straightforward (at least, until I tried to prettify the final output with the blocker's name and log comment). quarry:query/46454 and quarry:query/46455. —Cryptic 22:20, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
logging
twice, rather than querying logging
and then ipblocks
, which is where the overhead came from, in an attempt to keep in users who are not currently subject to a block. I was also using log_action IN ("block", "reblock")
, but I don't imagine that made much odds. Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 22:26, 8 July 2020 (UTC)ReplyNaypta, I just have a brief technical question which I suspect you are the best person to address. I'm slowly coming out of a period of very depressed activity here and I would like to substantially increase the volume of my RfC notices. But under both old and current systems, the numbers of notices which I have been signed up for per category have never come close to being met. Is there a default global limit of notices per calendar month per user, and if so, is {{Frs user}} the appropriate and reliable way to override the defaul? Snow let's rap 00:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Is AWB still inserting blank lines for you? Following discussion at WT:AWB#AWB on Linux, I tried winetricks riched20
, which seems to have fixed it for me. If you can confirm it's fixed then we can close the Phab ticket; if not then I'll leave it open for you and anyone else seeing the problem. Certes (talk) 12:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
riched20
installed already, along with the other winetricks recommended at the AWB on Linux page. As I've not seen it in a while, if there's nobody else who's reported it, feel free to close the Phab ticket; I'll reopen it if I see it happening again. Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 15:31, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi, Naypta... you might not remember me, but I talked to you on the IRC chat a while ago about improving my article with references... well, a week ago, thanks to your invaluable advice, Matchbox Educable Noughts And Crosses Engine was improved enough to be approved for creation! Thanks again, WikiMacaroons (talk) 16:16, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for fixing the vandalism on Nova Bus LF Series!MTATransitFan (talk) 21:08, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes later this week
<translate nowrap></translate>
on the source page. [6]Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1986 enlargement of the European Communities you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 07:41, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Naypta - how could you have been socking all this time without telling me? I'm hurt :(. GeneralNotability (talk) 22:58, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
On 15 July 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2020 Twitter Bitcoin scam, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:40, 16 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: No Reason At All ;) - RichT|C|E-Mail 10:16, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:59, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
The article 1986 enlargement of the European Communities you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1986 enlargement of the European Communities for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 16:01, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
The article 1986 enlargement of the European Communities you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1986 enlargement of the European Communities for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 20:41, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1986 enlargement of the European Communities, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estado Novo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes later this week
Future changes
Printable version
link. This will disappear. That is because web browsers today can create a printable version or show how it will look in print anyway. [14]Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:11, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
I believe that your wholesale rejection of the edits based on one link is overkill, as I compiled information about three organizations and added updated new content. I am happy to rewrite the Introduction to meet with the guidelines (and thanks for pointing those out), but the other edits and updates had nothing to do with that About Us page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by B'landRes (talk • contribs) 15:14, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I noticed your recent edit on there, and I was wondering if you could change the info in his “personal life.” It mentions this Hong Kong Instagram post incident which has nothing to do with his PERSONAL life. The editor was RealFakeKim and their entire profile is full of editing Hong Kong protests, so it’s an anti in disguise editing Jackson’s page to spread an agenda. I can not change his wiki by myself, so I’m respectfully asking❤️ Wanggaeparkgae (talk) 19:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
I only found your account because it had you on the bottom of his “Talk” page and said you edited it 11 days ago. I don’t know much about wiki. The mention of the incident I meant is in his “Personal Life” section Paragraph 2 and unrelated to his personal life and made by someone with a clear agenda. It says Weibo, not Instagram (my bad about that). It’s about him posting midst the Hong Kong protests. I just want that paragraph gone because it has nothing to do with his personal life and is a way to incite hatred against him. I’m new to the wiki thing, so I didn’t know how to make the request. I just saw that you edited it and looked at your profile and thought you could change it, but I will attempt the way you directed too. Wanggaeparkgae (talk) 19:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
It’s not that I “just don’t like it.” It’s that it’s not about his personal life AND is a controversial topic aka more reason it shouldn’t even be in his personal life because it has nothing to do with it. It is factually incorrect to be under that labeling. Just because it is sourced appropriately does not mean it’s appropriate to be on his page and especially under that label.
Your page talks a lot about being someone’s friend and doing the right thing and “protecting the wiki from vandalism”, “keeping this place a reliable source of knowledge for all,” and contributions follow policy” but you don’t see a problem with a person whose only contributions have been related to the Hong Kong protests adding that to a celebrity‘s PERSONAL LIFE label as a clear way to incite anger and misinformation because it does not even accurately explain everything.
You have the power to remove it and are choosing not to. It WILL get changed, and I will make it get changed. You not doing so and compiling with it is just a hindrance and frankly annoying considering how “positive” and “friendly” your page is. Wanggaeparkgae (talk) 20:19, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
It WILL get changedisn't how Wikipedia works; decisions are made by consensus, not by any single individual. No one person can guarantee something is or isn't going to remain on Wikipedia. Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 20:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
It’s not about his personal life, and he is never political. I see this convo is pointless as you magically don’t see the stance I’m coming from but about your last point: I don’t care. It will get changed, and I will be the first to point it out to you when it has cause I won’t stop❤️ Wanggaeparkgae (talk) 20:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi! I’ve seen your nomination at WP:FAC. I must say that while I often find myself lacking spare time nowadays and I can’t say I know the exact details, the topic of your article is adjacent to a personal interest of mine, so I’d be happy to review your article if you could review mine as quid pro quo. My article is hassium, and while it may feel like it’s rather technical, I’ve tried my best to make it readable for a general reader, so even if you feel like you don’t have enough knowledge on the topic at hand, a review would still be appreciated.—R8R (talk) 09:27, 21 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi! I've been able to respond to your comments, hope you'll be able to take a look soon.
But what I really wanted to write is that I should be able to start my review tomorrow. Also, I want to tell you that I once reviewed an FAC nomination of an article about something related to the Chinese Communist Party. While I ended up supporting the nomination, it did not pass because nobody else turned up at the FAC page. So my friendly advice to you as a fellow editor would be that if nobody else turns up in a week or so, it might be wise to look for more reviewers yourself, like why I wrote to you in the first place. Maybe the WikiProjects covering Spain, Portugal, and the European Union could help, too. I'd hate to see that happen before my eyes once again because I know how much work goes into writing a bronze star-worthy article.--R8R (talk) 18:36, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes later this week
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
13:52, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Didn't want to muddy that discussion any further. It looks bad if the candidate doesn't answer fairly quickly for at least the first 18 or so hours of the RfA (because they're expected to have started it at a time that was convenient for themselves), but the bigger problem is that if someone asks a question with a diff (which ought to be most questions), everyone is going to go look at that diff, and some people won't wait for the answer before they go ahead and oppose on the basis of the diff, and it only takes a few opposes before those who come into RfAs looking for the chance to oppose feel comfortable doing it because there are other opposes. So when a candidate gets a question with a diff that doesn't look great and needs an explanation, it can feel very much like every minute counts. —valereee (talk) 14:55, 28 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
an expressed intent to mop in areas you haven't done significant work is going to generate widespread opposes; well, as I highlighted, in plenty of cases, it's difficult to impossible to provide proof of dealing with things like revdel beyond taking the word of the admins who one's contacted previously to ask them to undertake the revdel itself. Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 15:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi - you recently participated in an AfD for Matthew Lynn and I just wanted to let you know I've re-nominated the article in case you'd like to participate in the new discussion. Paradoxsociety 09:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply