I think I've addressed all of your issues - thanks. Connormah 16:27, 25 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
 |
Nikkimaria has been made a member of the Order of the Mop,
Kind regards and happy editing, |
 |
Fridae'sDoom has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Thanks for all your hard work and enjoy the cookies! To our newest admins, good luck with all the requests enjoy your shiny buttons and do us proud!
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Fridae'sDoomat11:54, 26 August 2010 (UTC).Reply
I've no doubt you'll make great use of your tools. Your review of George Washington was superb and although I should've requested Peer review (sorry) it helped greatly in getting the article to where it is now. Ғяіᴅaз'§Đøøм | Tea and biscuits? 23:25, 26 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hi Nikkimaria. An editor suggested that I would be good at reviewing good articles, as I've worked with AfC for a while- I understand that the standards are much higher though! As such, the unilateral way good articles are reviewed makes me rather nervous. I don't really want to pass something on my own in case I do something wrong or overlook something, being that I'm still getting my head around all the criteria and instructions for reviewing. Would you mind double-checking my first few reviews when I do them? I understand if you don't have time, being a new admin and all (congrats, by the way!), but I couldn't think of a better person to ask. Thanks, sonia♫ 06:22, 27 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
On the subject of GAs, thanks for your speedy and perceptive review of Brian Twyne. I see that I was half-asleep when I added the references, since I left out the url for the Gibson article upon which much of the detail was based! I think I've now weaved in all of your ideas for improvement. Regards, and thanks once more. BencherliteTalk 19:42, 28 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Nikki. On re-read, you're absolutely correct. I'll try to be more careful when I'm on patrol. Thanks for the note. Regards, --Manway (talk) 04:20, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Just thought I'd drop a note about WP:NOTNAS. It seemed appropriate. Toddst1 (talk) 07:38, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the comments! I think I've fixed most of them, would you mind stopping by to check? ceranthor 15:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the support; I asked a question at my talk page. ceranthor 15:57, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:50, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hi, since the review was closed by bot, I never got the chance to heard the rest of your concerns about the article. I think I managed to close the loops on the issues you pointed out, I would like to follow-up on the rest of the issues and resolve them properly before we nominate the article again. Would you care to list them out here (or at the article's talk page)? Thanks, Ta-Va-Tar (discuss–?) 00:47, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for all your help with Armero tragedy; the FAC was promoted earlier today. Hope to see you around in the future, maybe with an article of yours. ceranthor 19:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hello! Your submission of Lorne Kidd Smith at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Rlevse • Talk • 00:19, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:36, 9 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
 | On10 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lorne Kidd Smith, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:05, 13 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
For your comments on the Abe Lincoln article. We're still fixing the issues, even though the FAC is closed. You have a good eye for prose issues. I hope it didn't feel like a waste of time to you; it wasn't. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 06:19, 17 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your review of my ancient computer. I think I got all your points, but if I missed something please let me know. It'll probably be back to weird after this one; I've got a great story about two children who accidentally arrived in 12th-century England after a matter transporter malfunctioned on their home planet. :-) Malleus Fatuorum 12:58, 18 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for taking the time for the review. Could you please explain what you mean about "20th Century" not being in chronological order? Racepacket (talk) 22:02, 18 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
| Why be everyone a–talkin' all strangely today? | ||
|---|---|---|
| ☠ Because we ☠ ☠ ARRRRRR! ☠ | ||
 |
With a yo-ho-ho, I be wishin' yer a right rollickin' ☠ Happy International Talk Like a Pirate Day ☠ To be a joinin' the fun and frolicks, yer can be addin' {{User:Chzz/pirate}} to the top o' yer talkpage / userpage for today, fer a fine fancy decoration. Emptied after midnight it'll be, so don't be dallyin' now! Hoist yer mainsail t'wards the I-R-Sea, either a'helpin' new sailorsoron me own poopdesk, and let's parrty like it's 1699! Cap'nChzz ► 00:01, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply | |
|
Problems playing this file? See media help. |
*How To Be Speakin' Pirate-Like *Official website *Auto-translate to pirate speak |
 |
| Disclaimer: It's very rare for me to send messages like this; it might seem frivolous or hypocritical, as I often complain about myspacing of the project. However, as a pastafarian, this is my equivalent of a Christmas greeting. I seriously believe we need to have fun sometimes. If you object, I apologize; let me know, and I won't bother you again. | ||
while talking with someone , you should be polite and you are not..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by SuhasDCamper (talk • contribs) 20:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
( thats saddddd —Preceding unsigned comment added by SuhasDCamper (talk • contribs) 21:04, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
While having talk with others be polite.... that is to be followed by you(Mandatory)
About my Page : Suhas D Camper Let me know how can I place this page as compiled with policies ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SuhasDCamper (talk • contribs) 20:56, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
If the message was with good humour, then its ok......
Messages from you
"Hello there. Just as a note, if you want to engage in constructive discussion with another user, the best place to do that is at their talk page - in my case, User talk:Nikkimaria. Your article was deleted because the subject did not seem to be notable enough for an encyclopedia article. Please restrict biographies of yourself to User:SuhasDCamper (see WP:USERPAGE for some guidelines on what is and is not appropriate for userpages). Nikkimaria (talk) 20:48, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
That's better! However, deleting an article because it doesn't meet our notability guidelines is not impolite. It's also not impolite to tell a contributor - that would be you - how to engage discussion and what he or she can do to prevent "their" material from being deleted. Since you only started editing under this name today, I assume that you would appreciate being informed of how things work around here. If I'm wrong...then just follow Wikipedia rules and guidelines and I shouldn't have to bother you again. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:57, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
If the article meets notability guidelines, then provide sources that prove it. If not, then keep the page as your userpage, instead of as an article. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:59, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
" Hey there, I was in the middle of creating an article on Forgotten Technology and you decided to delete it before I had the chance to enter the rest of my work, including all of my citations. I would appreciate it if you could give me more than thirty seconds to complete my work and validate it before you delete it.
THATS RUDE :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by SuhasDCamper (talk • contribs) 21:16, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hi,
Actually Yesterday I was just kidding around.... Got sad when you guys deleted my page and its OK as I know that it wasn't compile with the Wiki guidelines Thanks for providing info... and SORRY
In guidelines its stated that we cant create page with autobiography... So my query is that I want to create a page which provides details of a particular person and in my case its about myself.... general info
So other then having UserPage, will it be possible for me to create one which has a general/personal info ? If possible please in short can you let me know how it can be done.
And once again SORRY if you feel bad or I hurt you by any mean as I was just kidding and I dont meant o HURT you...
One more thing.... this editing tool sucks (The options are less for editing or might be everything need to be done by brackets) —Preceding unsigned comment added by SuhasDCamper (talk • contribs) 19:36, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
I am stuck on the History article...Not sure what more i can do all that fast...You think if you closed it ..we could work on it and try again in a few months. My main problem is with "The article needs some general copy-editing for grammar and clarity" and "Avoid passive voice and indirect constructions" as i am not sure were this needs to be done and could take lots of time back and forth. I have not given up...but i edit for fun ..and i am a little discouraged with my progress thus far. I have no problems with a GA fail...as i will keep at it regardless if its still undergoing the GA review or not . Moxy (talk) 23:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the info Nikki —Preceding unsigned comment added by SuhasDCamper (talk • contribs) 02:27, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Nikkimaria I would like to know why you deleted my file on the ramen assassins I know it's not a big hot topic but my friends were looking foward to that article this really isn't cool I thought wikipedia was supposed to be fun well right now it's not fun at all —Preceding unsigned comment added by ArchRassassins (talk • contribs) 13:38, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
| |
User:Nikkimaria has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:00, 25 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Since the page is archived, I'll reply here. Strasbourg - the one it is is linked to. Strasbourg. I can't access the book because I reached my limit. Thanks for the review, but it was nowhere near ready (and probably never will be). Aiken (talk) 00:38, 25 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the advice and criticism which you provided following the (somewhat premature) featured article candidacy of Razer (robot). May I ask you to expand on a few points in order that, even if the article cannot reach FA status, it can still be as watertight as possible?
Thank you for your time yesterday, and again for your time in reading and responding to this message. Best regards, CountdownCrispy 15:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hello, I will be doing the GA review for this article. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 16:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hi there,
Thanks for the GA review at Barry (dog), I think I've addressed the points you raised but if there are any more, let me know and I'll go through them.
Cheers,
First off, thank you for picking up this article. It's a bit of a meaty one so thank you for your initial review which has given our project a clear path in several areas that need help. I'm personally impressed that you are watching our progress rather than the "I'll be back in a week to see how you have done." It's really appreciated. FruitMonkey (talk) 13:38, 26 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks a lot for doing the GA review of this article. I went over your suggestions and tried to implement them the best I could. Please take another look. Thanks, Nsk92 (talk) 13:49, 26 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:41, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
| | On28 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Teaching to the test, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
I have posted a GA reassessment at Talk:Organ transplantation in the People's Republic of China. Please feel free to comment. Axl ¤ [Talk] 09:49, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hi Nikkimaria - just wanted you to know that I've cleared the issues you raised at the FAC and wanted to thank you for your review. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 00:02, 2 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hi Nikkimaria, I think the article Hong Kong is ready for another FACR, and there were many changes to the sources since the last FACR including the fixes from your list. Before I submit another request, would you mind taking another look at the references in the article? It would be great if you could add to the current peer review or the article talk page.
Thanks, Ta-Va-Tar (discuss–?) 04:19, 3 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
I appreciate your message on my talk page regarding the two-month rollbacker notice. I'd assumed I'd have to keep checking the page there, so it's good to know. Do you have suggestions of any problem areas that might be a good place to get a feel for it? I've been mainly a basic editor, mostly because I'm an older Wikipedian, and not familiar with the assistance that both computer knowledge and wiki-software can provide. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 00:46, 4 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:36, 5 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Would you be able to strike issues as they are resolved so I can understand my progress.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:36, 8 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 07:27, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
I've nominated EFF for another FAC, and as you commented last time, I would like you to look her over again. Thanks! Buggie111 (talk) 01:35, 13 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
| | On13 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Eastbourne manslaughter, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
AtOrmulum, when you add refs, can you please add the year of publication after the last name? Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 01:03, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
You have been a tower of strength, and I am most grateful. Thank you so much. If you can ever use an extra pair of eyes for a review, please don't hesitate to call on me. Tim riley (talk) 13:16, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hi Nikkimaria, i have added a few sources for 2 of the sentences, i have no idea if any of the sources are appropriate or not so ive just linked to the Googlebooks page which is how im searching for things, sadly i dont have access to any of the books and several of the main books are not available for freeview on there. If you have a chance could you take a look and see if any of them are any use? i have no idea what is considered a reliable source or not, especially for a FA, if none of them are any good please feel free to delete, i will carry on looking over the weekend for some. Thanks for finding many of the sources already, i dont now how you find them so quickly. Thanks again. BritishWatcher (talk) 22:53, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Nikkimaria, I wanted to thank you very much for the polite, professional, and kind demeanor in which you have conducted yourself whilst working to improve the quality of this article. You kept right along researching and making improvements, and focusing on the content issues involved. That is most appreciated. Once again, thank you very much for that positive attitude and behavior, -- Cirt (talk) 20:07, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| Nikkimaria, thank you very much for the polite and professional demeanor and the manner in which you have conducted yourself, in discussion at WP:FAR page Wikipedia:Featured article review/Ormulum/archive1 during your excellent improvements to the article Ormulum. There, and at the article's talk page as well, your matter-of-fact responses and ability to stay focused on issues of content is truly quite admirable. Much appreciated. The community is well-served by editors such as yourself that can contribute in such a fine and upstanding manner. Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 23:15, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Reply |
Hi, do you have plans to review the article about Pedro Álvares Cabral again? Regards, --Lecen (talk) 14:43, 17 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:12, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
|
The Empire on which the sun never sets Barnstar | |
| To recognise the legwork you do with the addition of offline sources, mosst recently at British Empire, I present you with this spectacular vista of the sun having set everywhere! Thank you for your help. hamiltonstone (talk) 00:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Reply |
I'm helping my boss do an article on Michael Colina (composer, musician, etc.). We are done with the editing and can't figure out how to submit to Wiki. Must it first go through peer review?? Can't figure out the steps for peer review. Can you help????? Booklover4 (talk) 15:47, 21 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, your feedback was very helpful to the article. Because it passed GA review, should I update the talk page assessment from B to GA, or should I wait for another editor as I was the nominator? KimChee (talk) 19:40, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
KimChee (talk) has given you a WikiCake! WikiCakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!
Spread the tastiness of cakes by adding {{subst:GiveCake}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
What remains to be done on images and how can I help? Fainites barleyscribs 14:42, 24 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your review of the article. A fellow Wikipedian had put a large effort in giving that article a face lift and I am pleased to see he has some feedback to consider moving forward. He's a new user of Wikipedia and I am hoping to demonstrate to him the power of collaboration. Your thorough review of his contribution will aid in demonstrating this point and provide guidance for his future efforts. Alan.ca (talk) 05:31, 25 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Nikkimaria. You kindly gave me a good deal of help with images in the FAC for William Walton recently (now promoted, I am happy to say). I am plotting to get another composer, Edward Elgar, up to FA standard, and I am wondering if I should seek to get the images checked in advance by an expert? Grateful for any advice you can give me. Regards. - Tim riley (talk) 21:35, 25 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
I want to thank you for your help with my English. Your name got lost when our Cold Turkey Press article was moved from my subpage (there had already been a CTP entry, which I forgot about. But I think you can add your name on the page somewhere.--Radh (talk) 11:39, 26 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
You should know better as an admin to turn up at an article you've never edited before for the sole purpose of repeatedly removing links to references. If someone asked you to do this, please be aware that there's a backstory of people being asked to do various things there, and other editors being criticized. I was asked for help by email too before I became the bad guy there.
Rather than joining in that situation, please explain your objections to the links on the talk page. Perhaps some compromise can be hammered out. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 13:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
You really aren't helping the situation at Pound with the forest fire. You also inadvertently removed one of my posts, which I'd appreciate if you'd restore. [2] Please deal with one issue at a time, so that if we can't resolve it at the page, we can draft an RfC. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 00:08, 27 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
For your review of De Iniusta Vexacione Willelmi Episcopi Primi! Sorry it took me a bit to reply, Real Life has been intruding quite a bit lately. I did do the suggested fixes you left! Ealdgyth - Talk 15:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Long time overdue, but I'd like to thank you for your brilliant GA review of Malaysia. It was amazingly comprehensive, especially in terms of all things to do with citations. The bullet layout allowed me to address all the points specifically, and I commend you for taking the time to do such a review. So Thank You, and I apologise for the lateness of this response, hope its okay!
As a side note, I'd also like to commend your work on British Empire, very quick and efficient. You know what you're doing! Chipmunkdavis (talk) 09:59, 29 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
I believe the article would now be ready for a GA nomination, and is on the way to FA. However, that is of course an inexperienced opinion. I realise that having reviewed it the first time you probably couldn't review it again, but I'd appreciate it greatly if you just gave it a quick look over and see if there are any outstanding issues you can see. The only part of your previous review I perhaps did not do was the restructuring of the main and subsections, mainly due to lack of precedent. My reasoning can be seen here Thanks again for the review, helped greatly. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 17:27, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your work so far. I just searched your page for the phrase "thank", and it appears 84 times! Well, here's a couple more instances. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 00:23, 30 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
I've replied to everything :)--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 00:04, 31 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:19, 2 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hi! Thanks for putting the appropriate template on the article; I'm not familiar with all deletion processes here. regards, – Alensha talk 05:00, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hi, you reviewed Shroud of Turin recently. I am not an expert on WP:MOS, so could you please comment there about the new referencing style as of 2 weeks ago which just says "Rogers 2005" and then has that in the references. It seems strange to me within Wikipedia, and it may be causing confusion. Or was that done based on your suggestion. In any case, your comments on that talk page Talk:Shroud_of_Turin#Comment_to_Thucyd will be appreciated. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 07:37, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hi! I'm new here to the Wikipedia community but would like to request that the page Rosie Teideman you deleted earlier today be put back up temporarily so that work can continue on the article. Unfortunately I had not yet finished work on the article and due to the Time Difference you may have deleted the article when I could not possibly continue work on it. I have sources and more information for the page but if you see another reason that the page remain closed then that seems fine. Thank you. Darkdweller (talk) 10:47, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I'm Srlancelot39 and a new member of Wikipedia. I would just like to ask about the deletion of my first page, 'Grail Quest (game)'. I am not completely finished the page, as I intend to add detail, formatting and additional sources. I know I'm no pro at creating pages, but I am just curious as to what I can do/change to avoid having pages deleted in the future, or the Grail Quest page if it is recreated. I have read the article about creating a page as well as the dos and donts of creating pages, but I did not see any obvious violations that my page may have made. Your feedback is greatly appreciated! Thank you! Srlancelot39 (talk) 19:58, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
I see that you just deleted Park Vale F.C.. Could you also go and delete Park Vale F.C? It's the same article, just without the final period. Also, I've warned the creating editor about continually recreating pages that have already been deleted, removing CSD tags, etc. I don't know that it will actually matter, but an admin warning might help as well; alternatively, it may be that the editor needs a temporary involuntary wikibreak to prevent the creation of more articles for others to delete. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:31, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Regarding your feedback, I probably get credit because I posted the article's main details, the article never would have been promoted had I not created it, but what to do? –BuickCenturyDriver 04:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
As I said here, they're essentially talk pages to pages that only exist to take you to another page. Just blanking them should be enough, then? HalfShadow 05:09, 9 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 17:08, 9 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, no idea... ed g2s • talk 11:28, 10 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:03, 10 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hello. I see that despite the explanation I posted you have deleted my Replicar Hellas article. As I had written, Replicar Hellas is a legitimate Car Manufacturer. Car manufacturers are included in relevant encyclopedias, even if they are much smaller and less significant than Replicar Hellas. I have written two books on the subject, please allow me to know it very well.
Wikipedia has chosen to include encyclopedia of car manufacturers (see e.g. List of car brands), which continuously requires such input (actually it is one of the most complete available today). If we choose to stop such contributions, then we must erase entire categories, such as car manufacturers, motorcycle manufacturers, truck manufacturers, and many-many other groups of manufacturers that include such small companies. Such a case is obviously not our decision, but would require a serious discussion (about reducing the content of Wikipedia).
In case you still insist, I think it is more fair to start a discussion on the article discussion page, and see what the consensus is. Skartsis (talk) 12:42, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hi. :) This article was blanked for evaluation at WP:CP and given the undoubted duplication, you understandably deleted it under WP:CSD#G12. However, servinghistory.com, like other pages of discoverymedia.net, is actually a mirror of Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks/Def#Discovery Media. We run into this website all the time at WP:CP. Sometimes they announce the Wikipedia copying on the page itself; sometimes they do not. Their main page at least acknowledges us: "Serving History features mashed data about world history from a variety of sources, including Wikipedia, Twitter, Bing, major newswires and blog consolidators." Since it isn't actually a G12, I'll go ahead and restore the article, but most of the content is going to be swept away anyway as flatly unencyclopedic. :/ I'm not sure if she's notable and may PROD. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:48, 13 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:58, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Why was Chuck Slavin's page deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbrewster1944 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your commentary! I think I've gotten to it all. ceranthor 20:48, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
I have renominated Albert Stanley again. Karanacs acknowledged that the last closure was probably premature, so hopefully it will attract sufficient attention this time around.
As you supported it last time, might I ask you to repeat your support this time around. --DavidCane (talk) 00:48, 25 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:39, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
As someone who commented on the previous FAC, perhaps you'd be interested in taking a look at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/.hack (video game series)/archive2? Thank you in advance, Axem Titanium (talk) 03:18, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
A retrospective thank you from WikiProject Wales team. Wales has now passed GA status but we were reliant on your first GA review. Thank you again. FruitMonkey (talk) 23:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
A proposed closing statement has been posted here. Please could you confirm whether you support or oppose this summary. Thanks. Elen of the Roads (talk) 21:08, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
As it says in the header; nothing extremely urgent. Courcelles 10:46, 5 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:48, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for looking through William Cragh, and especially for checking that I hadn't followed the sources too closely, and picking me up where I maybe had. Malleus Fatuorum 04:11, 9 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hello, I remember you listed, a couple of months ago, some items that might help make Razer (robot) into an FA. Well I feel I have created a paragraph which I feel could sort out the battlebots issue you mentioned. I would normally just stick it in but I felt a but concerned that if i've made a right mess of it, the article may lose it's GA status so I thought it's best to check first before adding it. The paragraph is here at this page. Please note that where the missing link is it is to link to this when in the article. Please let me know if this would rectify the issues or any way I could improve it. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Well, per SandyGeorgia you also need to get CountdownCrispy's approval before renominating. However, considering only my personal opinion, here are some other things to fix to give you a better chance at FAC:
Once you're satisfied that everything above has been addressed and the article is ready, feel free to give it another go at FAC. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:16, 13 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hi Nikkimaria. I wonder if you might take a look at the Shakespeare authorship question peer review? It has been completely rewritten using only WP:RS sources and striving for WP:NPOV. If not, I understand, but I'm planning to take it to FA soon in hopes to stabilise the page and halt the incessant edit-warring it has been subjected to since it was created, and your assessment—even a cursory one—would be most welcome. Thanks much. Tom Reedy (talk) 17:20, 13 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:26, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
A couple months ago, you created this Good article nomination page. I was wondering if you could take a look at the improvements that have been made and decide whether or not the article should be listed as a Good article? Thanks, The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 02:57, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
