Realitylink

Hi Realitylink! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 01:56, Monday, August 10, 2020 (UTC)

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Thanks so much for all your work on Paul Spoonley! Really appreciated. Violetnights (talk) 09:06, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

It has been an excellent page to work on and now I think reflects his contribution to NZ society. Appreciate the positive feedback. GregRealitylink (talk) 19:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Kia ora and thanks for updating the article on Anne Salmond with the Blake Award! FYI we have a regular online meet-up of Wikipedia/Wikimedia editors based in New Zealand which you're welcome to join - the next one is on 6 December: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Aotearoa_New_Zealand_Online/6 All the best, MurielMary (talk) 10:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Kia ora ano. I would enjoy meeting up with others at the meeting next Sunday. Greg Realitylink (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Great! You can see the agenda on that page. There's also a group of new editors who get together to ask and answer questions about editing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Aotearoa_New_Zealand_Editor_Support#23_November_2020 and if you are on Facebook there's a Wikipedia New Zealand group where people discuss editing too. MurielMary (talk) 08:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Cheers, sounds excellent. Greg Realitylink (talk) 09:43, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lonely (fashion label), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lonely (fashion label) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Gregsandbox2draft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the helporreference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 82.132.215.207 (talk) 07:47, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Just to let you know, I have moved Gregsandbox2drafttoUser:Realitylink/Gregsandbox2draft where you can work on it without interference. Regards --John B123 (talk) 09:22, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much. I was so excited to have such a great page to work on, that I incorrectly named the sandbox. Much appreciated.Realitylink (talk) 09:51, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

But, whoops, I seem to have lost the content....Realitylink (talk) 09:53, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Po' Girl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henderson High School, Auckland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henderson High School, Auckland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob Harvey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Turner (academic general practitioner) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 06:08, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Something like that can be most annoying. It's a very detailed article and obviously, a lot of work has gone into it. You've put good arguments forward. The easiest thing to avert deletion might be to proof that GNG has been met. You know all the sources; are there a couple of reliable sources where she was discussed as a person (as opposed to her work), with some biographical details? If you point me to those (please reply here), I'll take a look. If it stacks up, I shall comment accordingly. Schwede66 01:53, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it pretty a pretty hardline approach when she has done so much across all areas of science, not just the general practitioner aspect that they seem to see as being less than notable! Also, I am picking up that Turner, like many NZ scientists, is a very private person so there is little about her earlier life. I really liked this article by The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners because it was an interview in which she talked about a lot of her values and experiences that have shaped her career. But I got told early on that it was not a reliable secondary source so took it off. Have look anyway. Thanks for your interest. I feel strongly that this is a good article.Realitylink (talk) 03:52, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

• Dear Realitylink, I think things don't look good for your article on Nikki Turner. My view of the issue is that anyone with some academic publications tends gets judged by many on the WP:Prof criteria alone. It seems clear to me that she is a lot of good academic contributions but it is her work in public health generally and as director of IMAC and all the reports on/by her in the media are why she is notable and we should have a page on her. The page's over promotional tone... large content is something that often annoys people. I am not sure how best to proceed and I think it is often difficult to change the mood of an AfD once it has started. And lines like She is, at best, a standard academic in her field are I think very harsh. Anyway best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 15:26, 27 March 2021 (UTC))Reply

• Thanks for that Msrasnw; I reckon we have a way forward - check out the discussion on the deletion page.Realitylink (talk) 21:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

That isn't the way to deal with a stub assessment. Instead, what you do is either reassess an article by giving it a different rating (you need some experience for it, though), or, if the current assessment is obviously wrong, you remove that assessment part itself (in this case, the words "stub" where they appear). What you've done instead is remove the project tags in their entirety, and that is obviously undesirable. Those tags are there so that editors who belong to those WikiProjects can keep an eye on things. Schwede66 22:14, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that, appreciate your expertise. Realitylink (talk) 00:03, 17 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heather Tanguay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glen Eden.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jacqueline Beggs, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Indigenous and High-throughput.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Niki Davis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

I see that you've uploaded a photo of Jemma Geoghegan to Commons. That looks like rather professional work. Are you based in Dunedin? I'm asking because you say it's your own work and she's based in Dunedin. There is a group of active Wikipedians in Dunedin who sometimes meet; you might want to join them. But my main question is – did you take that photo in Dunedin? Schwede66 19:29, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Well, I have to admit that she took it herself and sent it to me. Lakes380 upload their own images and I did suggest that she uploaded it there but it wasn't happening, so I did it myself. I told her I was doing this. I guess it comes down from Wikicommons and then she uploads it to the other page now? So, yes, I don't live in Dunedin these days! Realitylink (talk) 21:59, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Well, I have to admit that I knew that the photo wasn't taken in Dunedin. It was taken by somebody working for Macquarie University (and not by herself, I'm afraid). Copyright rests with the photographer (and sometimes, they have signed their rights to their client, i.e. the university) and not with the subject. I shall nominate the photo for deletion. Don't pass other people's work as your own; it's the quickest way to get blocked across all of Wikimedia. Schwede66 22:10, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough. Realitylink (talk) 22:14, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ah, and the perils of rushing responses - too much happening! - when I was mentioning Lakes380 above, it was about an image for Susie Wood, who I did have a few communications with about her photo...so I guess this one will need to come down as well and I suggest to her that she upload it? (She did tell me she took it herself and was ok with it going up. I know there is a permission process for this...)You are a patient person; I hope you take my responses as being in good faith. I have a lot to learn and thanks for your help. Realitylink (talk) 23:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

My middle name is "patience" and it's not hard to see that you are a good faith editor. New editors do stuff up one thing or another (been there; done that) and the important thing is to learn from it etc. If you do have the permission from the photographer, there is no need to take a photo down; what you need to do is to get them to send their permission to Commons. Here's an email template; fill that out for each photo and send it off to the respective photographer. I'll mark those photos as "OTRS pending" on Commons.

Here's a list of what you have uploaded to Commons. I've converted this to a wikitable – see below. Can you please edit the table below, and replace "tbd" (to be determined) with what needs to happen to each photo? I suggest the following fields:

• OTRS
• delete
• own work
• licence ok

How does that sound? Schwede66 04:58, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I will start with the ones I know for sure...and will chip away at them. (what does OTRS mean exactly? The same as tbd?):Realitylink (talk) 06:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

The page that has the email template contains an explanation and links where you can read up on the details. But for the purpose of this exercise, whenever you send an email off for a photo, put OTRS into the table below. Schwede66 06:47, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Glen Eden Playhouse.jpg – what is the website, please? I'd like to have a look what they say about copyright. Schwede66 06:50, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

I contacted the person who took the Playhouse photo, Paul Hafner and he confirmed I could use it (see email below)

        From: Paul Hafner <paul@auckland-west.co.nz> 
        Sent: Monday, 15 March 2021 4:59 PM
        To: greg@chalmers.kiwi
        Subject: Re: Permission to use an image on Wikipedia

        Kia ora Greg,
        thanks for your enquiry, and yes you are welcome to use my image (file PICT7903aw.jpg, http://auckland- 
        west.co.nz/2010/01/13/playhouse-theatre-glen-eden-3/) for your work on a wikipedia page.
        Best wishes for this project.
        Paul

Realitylink (talk) 07:02, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ah, good. That is one of the OTRS cases. The email above isn't good enough; please follow up with them using the text as provided.

What's the story with Richard Clinghan, please? It says "your work" on the file but "licence ok" in the table below. Schwede66 07:53, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Whoops, sorry getting mixed up with the cover image - which is definitely the author's; so yes, OTRS.Realitylink (talk)

And Theatre image.jpg – is that also OTRS as opposed to "licence ok"? Schwede66 07:54, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Holy moly...not even sure what image that is? Ah here is the permission I think...

      Permission details
      This image has been released as "CCBY" by Auckland Museum. For details refer to the Commons project page.

Definitely a good learning curve...won't happen again! Had to swing out of a family card game to sweep upstairs to the computer...as you do. I tried releasing David Wratt image...just followed the process. Will that work? I haven't sent it to him...??(talk) 08:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

You should definitely socialise with family; sorting this out isn't urgent. I don't know what you mean by "I tried releasing David Wratt image...just followed the process. Will that work?" I see that the OTRS team has made a modification. What needs to happen is for you to complete the boiler plate text, you then send that to the photographer, asking the photographer to send that permission to the OTRS team. Schwede66 09:21, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, yes all sorted with the process I think. Sent the link to David Wratt to complete and send to Permissions. Will do the others tomorrow. Cheers Realitylink (talk) 11:13, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sent the emails to David Wratt (His has been approved already), Susie Wood, Dave Lowe, Tim Naish and Paul Hafner. Just gotta do Jim Salinger now. Realitylink (talk) 04:07, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Theatre image.jpg needs sorting, too. If it comes from a website that says CCBY, there needs to be a link provided to that website. For the time being, I've set this to "tbd". Schwede66 04:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

I thought the Theatre image one was already on Wikicommons, but not sure? So far I have been cc'd into permissions being added to images for: David Wratt, Glen Eden Playhouse, Dave Lowe, Tim Naish - pretty sure those for Nikki Turner, Jim Salinger and Susie Wood will go through judging from the email communications so far. Some of those ones of Susie Wood out in the field are a little more difficult to trace. Richard Clinghan has his own Wikipedia account so can probably deal with the image himself. Gonna lose that one of the Hollywood Theatre though - will go out and get some shots this morning. Thanks again for your support and patience. Realitylink (talk) 20:28, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

No, those licences are not ok. You uploaded the file and if you are not the photographer, you have to go through the OTRS process. Having an email that says "it's ok to use that photo" is not good enough. Having been copied into permission emails is also not enough. The issue is resolved when the OTRS team changes the licence; I'll now go through and tag all the images. Schwede66 22:46, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ok, so do I need to do anything at this stage? Realitylink (talk) 02:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

I've updated the table below. Everywhere where it says "OTRS pending", you need to send the photographer a permission email if you haven't done so already. Beyond that, we'll wait whether the OTRS volunteers sign off on what they receive. Those photos where licences remain unresolved we'll put up for deletion. Schwede66 04:50, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Levy (paleoclimatologist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern Continent.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

All fixed now, thanks. Realitylink (talk) 06:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Greetings of the season! I see you've written Church of St. John the Baptist, Auckland. Good on you. I thought to get in touch in case you also work on Wikidata (the thing that connects all the different language Wikipedias with one another plus Commons plus all sorts of other things). In case you don't — please ignore this message. In case you do, you may be interested to hear that there is a complete set of entries for items listed by Heritage New Zealand. In this case, a bot created a Wikidata entry because the title of your page was different to how it was listed in Wikidata (had the title matched, the bot would have found it). If you had searched for the Wikidata item, you would have found it (especially if you knew that there was an entry already, which you now do). I've merged the two Wikidata items, which is easy enough to do. Any questions, please ask (here's good).

Keep up your good work! Schwede66 02:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that. I haven't had anything to do with Wikidata, but should do I feel! Do I need to do anything specific to get involved with it?Realitylink (talk) 23:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

It's like Wikipedia. Edit it if you feel so inclined. It's a good way to see what's online; there are some very nifty tools for creating lists of items (e.g. those things listed by Heritage New Zealand restricted to a region of interest). A related cool tool is Wikishootme; this runs on your phone (it's a website), and once you authorise its use (same Wikipedia account), it knows where you are and shows you Wikidata items with coordinates where there's no photo yet. Easy to find listed heritage buildings. Wikishootme uploads to Commons and links the photo to the Wikidata entry. Very cool! Schwede66 03:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ok, so I was thinking of doing a draft of a page for Andrew Becroft and see that he has a Wikidata page. Obviously I can use the references from there - all nicely archived. And if the article does get done...it will link back to Wikidata automatically as long as the name is the same?Realitylink (talk) 20:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

It's easy enough to link it yourself (if it doesn't do it automatically). Whey you have the Wikidata page open, hit "edit" next to 'Wikipedia'. Where it then says "Wiki", it wants the relevant language code – that's en for the English Wikipedia. You then get to see an input field "page" where you enter the article's name. Hit "publish" and it's all done. Schwede66 01:15, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Kia ora,

We are meeting on Thursday 17 March at 7.30pm on Zoom to establish Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand Inc ("WANZ Inc") as an Incorporated Society. Please do join us. You can find more information here

Einebillion (talk) 07:01, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello - my name is Susan Gerbic (Sgerbic) and I'm writing to you because at some point you joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism. This might have been months ago - or even years ago. With the best of intentions the project was created years ago, and sadly like many WikiProjects has started to go dormant. A group of us are attempting to revitalize the Skepticism project, already we have begun to clean up the main page and I've just redone the participant page. No one is in charge of this project, it is member directed, which might have been the reason it almost went dormant. We are attempting to bring back conversations on the talk page and have two subprojects as well, in the hopes that it might spark involvement and a way of getting to know each other better. One was created several years ago but is very well organized and a lot of progress was made, Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skeptical organisations in Europe. The other I created a couple weeks ago, it is very simple and has a silly name Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skepticism Stub Sub-Project Project (SSSPP). This sub-project runs from March 1 to June 1, 2022. We are attempting to rewrite skepticism stubs and add them to this list. As you can see we have already made progress.

The reason I'm writing to you now is because we would love to have you come back to the project and become involved, either by working on one of the sub-projects, proposing your own (and managing it), or just hanging out on the talk page getting to know the other editors and maybe donate some of your wisdom to some of the conversations. As I said, no one is in charge, so if you have something in mind you would like to see done, please suggest it on the talk page and hopefully others will agree. Please add the project to your watchlist, update your personal user page showing you are a proud member of WikiProject Skepticism. And DIVE in, this is what the work list looks like [1] frightening at first glance, but we have already started chipping away at it.

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Participants page has gone though a giant change - you may want to update your information. And of course if this project no longer interests you, please remove your name from the participant list, we would hate to see you go, but completely understand.

Thank you for your time, I hope to edit with you in the future.Sgerbic (talk) 07:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Realitylink

Thank you for creating Dion O'Neale.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:34, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Realitylink, if people have a significant COVID role you should add them to this navbox: Template:COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand Schwede66 10:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, have done that now. Realitylink (talk) 12:46, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of education in New Zealand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Keys.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello Realitylink! Your additions to History of education in New Zealand have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• Ifyou own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. I see that it was a quick save to prevent loss of editing, however it was almost entirely copied before being edited down to quoting, and that's not allowed to touch mainspace. Maybe try copy-pasting it if you think your browser's going to crash in the future? Thank you. Sennecaster (Chat) 22:40, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, and thanks for the notification. What about something like: Another publication collated essays that considered several issues that needed to be resolved before the goals of Tomorrow's Schools be could be realised.

If this is ok, and I add it, then I am assuming you can remove the tag? Once again, my appreciation for your prompt and entirely appropriate action. This is what makes Wikipedia credible. Nice work. Let me know your thinking...or perhaps I just take the whole reference out of the article? Your call. Realitylink (talk) 00:25, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

That works, feel free to re-add. The tag won't be removed until an administrator processes it though, as I'm asking for just the revisions with copyrighted content to be redacted. It shouldn't affect your work unless you're adding more. I don't really know much about the topic, but I think WP:SPS and primary source guidelines might be a concern in this case. If the information exists in secondary sources, that's usually a more reliable source. Sennecaster (Chat) 01:36, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barry Brickell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Gazette.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Fixed now, thanks. Realitylink (talk) 09:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your additions! Could you be so kind as to note that the article uses mdy dates and is so tagged at the top of the article? It is your responsibility to make sure you use the right date format, but all your additions have dmy dates. Skyerise (talk) 12:09, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Whoops, very sorry about that lack of attention to detail! We do get a bit Kiwi-centric down here in New Zealand and forget that the world does not always do things as we do...just kidding. My apologies. It looks like they have been fixed up now? Thanks for letting me know. Much appreciated. Realitylink (talk) 19:05, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of education in New Zealand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Shaw.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

All fixed now. Thanks. Realitylink (talk) 09:34, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aotearoa New Zealand's histories, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Bennett and Hamilton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Fixed Realitylink (talk) 09:53, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Any user can do assessments, as least up to B class. What those classes mean for WPNZ is described here. Importance is hugely subjective but one measure that can be looked at is page views. As a rule of thumb, some 60% of pages belonging to a Wikiproject should be low importance; the balance should thus distribute itself across the remainder. Pages that get started today are mostly low importance as the important topics have all been dealt with. Schwede66 02:01, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Realitylink. Thank you for your work on The 1908 Blackball miners' strike. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:37, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Much appreciated. Thank you. Realitylink (talk) 20:17, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Genetically modified food in Oceania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northland.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Genetically modified food in Oceania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stuff.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

See MOS:INOROUT. When what is being quoted is a sentence fragment, the terminal period is outside the quotation marks. When the quotation is a full sentence, and the quotation ends with a period, then the period is inside the quotation marks. Paora (talk) 21:56, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yes, thanks for that. I spent hours last night scouring for an answer and missed that bit about the 'fragment'! So is the expectation that if a full sentence is being quoted, it would need to have the upper case letter included in the quote when added to the article in the middle of the sentence? Would it need a colon before?? Comma?? Somehow that looks kind of weird to me; I certainly haven't done it with all my quotes in the past, and don't see it often in Wikipedia articles. But hey, we keep learning and it is something I will watch in the future and go back and revert my edits from this morning, and maybe add a couple of captitals....Realitylink (talk) 22:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

I suspect the answer is, yes! No problem and good to get it right. I am going back over some of other articles and checking on them. Thanks for drawing my attention to this. Kia ora.Realitylink (talk) 01:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of the Otago Region, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Fox.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

You might be interested in an upcoming event in Auckland. Wikimedia Aotearoa is having a WikiCon! WikiCon Aotearoa 2024 is the annual gathering for all new and experienced editors of Wikipedia, Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, and Wikisource projects. Anyone interested in editing is welcome to attend. This conference is organized by Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand (WANZ). It aims to provide training to new editors, to encourage editors to learn new skills, to grow the Wiki community in Auckland and to ensure that we have a fun weekend. Food and refreshments provided.  

When: Saturday 23 March - Sunday 24 March 2024

Where: Auckland University of Technology - Sir Paul Reeves Building - WG Building 2 Governor Fitzroy Place, Auckland.

Cost: $10, fully catered, sponsorship / registration fee waiver available  

We are offering full scholarships (registration, travel & accommodation) to attend - please contact info@wikimedia.nz for more information.

To see the full programme as it develops check out the Wikipedia Event page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiCon_Aotearoa/Auckland_2024

To register: https://events.humanitix.com/wikicon-aotearoa-2024 CopperAlchemy (talk) 00:53, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gordon Hunter Memorial Trophy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aaron Smith.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Te Papa is hosting an edit-a-thon on Saturday 13 July 2024 between 10am and 4pm. Lunch will be provided. The theme of the edit-a-thon is Te Papa Expeditions and editors will be working on updating wikipedia articles and wikidata on expeditions, people, places, ships, and species. Come along to learn more. It’s free and lunch will be provided. Register here: https://tepapamuseum.rezdy.com/652753/expeditions-editathon More information on this event page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Wellington/Expeditions_Edit-a-thon_13_July_2024 We hope to see you there. Einebillion (talk) 02:12, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply