Home  

Random  

Nearby  



Log in  



Settings  



Donate  



About Wikipedia  

Disclaimers  



Wikipedia





StuartDouglas


Joined 28 May 2004
 


User page  

Talk  



Watch  

View history  

Contributions  

Edit  


 

Languages  

What links here  

User logs  

View user groups  

Permanent link  

Page information  

Edit full page  

Download QR code  





Latest comment: 2 months ago by FireflyBot in topic Concern regarding Draft:Scott Liddell
 


  • 2 Disambiguation link notification for March 4
  • 3 Disambiguation link notification for March 11
  • 4 Proposed deletion of Against Nature (Obverse Books)
  • 5 Disambiguation link notification for April 22
  • 6 Proposed deletion of Wildthyme in Purple
  • 7 WP:BURDEN and Obverse books
  • 8 Potential conflict of interest
  • 9 Orphaned non-free media (File:NinniesCoverObverseBooks, 2013.jpg)
  • 10 May 2013
  • 11 Nomination of The Ninnies for deletion
  • 12 Orphaned non-free media (File:Aginst Nature Front Cover, Obverse Books, 2013.jpg)
  • 13 Orphaned non-free media (File:Cover to the short story collection, Zenith Lives.jpg)
  • 14 Orphaned non-free media (File:IAfront2.jpg)
  • 15 Orphaned non-free media (File:Iris Wildthyme and the Celestial Omnibus.jpg)
  • 16 regarding "agendas"
  • 17 Orphaned non-free media (File:NinniesCoverObverseBooks, 2013.jpg)
  • 18 Disambiguation link notification for June 5
  • 19 Disambiguation link notification for August 29
  • 20 Disambiguation link notification for September 5
  • 21 September 2013
  • 22 Disambiguation link notification for September 24
  • 23 Disambiguation link notification for October 17
  • 24 File:Pbohfront.jpg listed for deletion
  • 25 Disambiguation link notification for January 10
  • 26 Disambiguation link notification for February 19
  • 27 Orphaned non-free image File:Big blockade.jpg
  • 28 Someone else nominated this, but didn't alert you.
  • 29 Nomination of Timothy combe for deletion
  • 30 Disambiguation link notification for November 13
  • 31 ArbCom elections are now open!
  • 32 Orphaned non-free image File:Ben poster.JPG
  • 33 Orphaned non-free image File:Dickturpin tv.jpg
  • 34 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
  • 35 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
  • 36 ArbCom 2017 election voter message
  • 37 Ann Sears moved to draftspace
  • 38 Your submission at Articles for creation: Ann Sears (November 1)
  • 39 ArbCom 2018 election voter message
  • 40 ArbCom 2019 election voter message
  • 41 Last warning
  • 42 Nomination of Jeremy Hoad for deletion
  • 43 ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
  • 44 Orphaned non-free image File:DandyDick.jpg
  • 45 Proposed deletion of Harry Stone (footballer)
  • 46 Proposed deletion of Harry Stone (footballer)
  • 47 Orphaned non-free image File:Sideways Door.jpg
  • 48 Orphaned non-free image File:Goofy baseball.jpg
  • 49 Nomination of Kelly Hale for deletion
  • 50 Orphaned non-free image File:Caneandmabel.jpg
  • 51 Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott Liddell (December 1)
  • 52 Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott Liddell (December 10)
  • 53 Concern regarding Draft:Scott Liddell
  • (Belated) Welcome

    edit

    Hello, StuartDouglas, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

    We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:12, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zenith Lives!: Tales of M.Zenith, the Albino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Mann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

    It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Girl on the Trapeze, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Crescent Moon and Kenneth Warren (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

    It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

    Proposed deletionofAgainst Nature (Obverse Books)

    edit
     

    The article Against Nature (Obverse Books) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

    I cannot find significant discussion of this book in reliable sources per WP:NBOOK. Google search results in bookshop sites, blogs, and social media.

    While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

    You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

    Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster talk 02:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Ninnies, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages League of Gentlemen and Young Adult (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

    It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

    Proposed deletionofWildthyme in Purple

    edit
     

    The article Wildthyme in Purple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

    no indication it meets WP:N

    While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

    You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

    Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:06, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

    WP:BURDEN and Obverse books

    edit

    Claims of notability without actually providing reliable third party sources about the specific subject are as meaningless as a fart in a windstorm. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:10, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

    also take a look at WP:NOTINHERITED just because something related to something may be notable, the other subjects notability does not rub off and make the other thing notable. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:12, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

    Potential conflict of interest

    edit

    Based on the fact that your user name is one of primary individuals involved in the articles that you have been editing:

      Hello, StuartDouglas. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

    All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

    If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

    Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

    For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:48, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

    Please stop making edits to subjects directly related to your business. You should instead use the talk page and make suggestions. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:28, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
    Hi Stuart, I do think it would be a good idea to keep your head down and not edit the Obverse Books article, or any article directly related to OB's publications. You can alert editors to news coverage of your publications through the talk page, but I would also suggest hanging back a bit and giving your readers a chance to pick up on this coverage through your website and social media first.Rankersbo (talk) 09:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
    Fair enough - it seems (even on a site as mentally challenging as Wikipedia) an odd idea that a person who knows about a thing shouldn't talk about that thing or post links to that thing (esecially since I don't post links to other links on either the website or the our facebook/twitter page only the announcements themselves - and apparently these places aren't reliable enough anyway), but hey ho, that wouldn't even make the top twenty inanities on Wikipedia :) StuartDouglas (talk) 11:33, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

    Those are suggestions there is no prohibition from editing a COI area. I'd just understand that if people know they scrutinize you more. For example I wrote Dax Charles article, I know this person personally, that didn't mean I couldn't write the article I just had to make sure it was sourced with WP:RS and followed WP:NPOV. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 11:50, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free media (File:NinniesCoverObverseBooks, 2013.jpg)

    edit

      Thanks for uploading File:NinniesCoverObverseBooks, 2013.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

    May 2013

    edit
     

    Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

    To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 11:55, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

    Thanks for the advice. Appreciated.StuartDouglas (talk) 12:27, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
    Don't log out to edit war, as you did with 81.101.253.171 (talk · contribs). It's deceptive and will get you blocked. Consider this your only warning. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:01, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
    Since I did no such thing, as easily demonstrated, what possible basis do you have for this warning?StuartDouglas (talk) 14:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

    Nomination of The Ninnies for deletion

    edit
     

    A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Ninnies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

    The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ninnies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

    Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 00:47, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free media (File:Aginst Nature Front Cover, Obverse Books, 2013.jpg)

    edit

      Thanks for uploading File:Aginst Nature Front Cover, Obverse Books, 2013.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free media (File:Cover to the short story collection, Zenith Lives.jpg)

    edit

      Thanks for uploading File:Cover to the short story collection, Zenith Lives.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free media (File:IAfront2.jpg)

    edit

      Thanks for uploading File:IAfront2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free media (File:Iris Wildthyme and the Celestial Omnibus.jpg)

    edit

      Thanks for uploading File:Iris Wildthyme and the Celestial Omnibus.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

    regarding "agendas"

    edit

    Yes, i do have an "agenda", to keep Wikipedia an encyclopedia whose articles meet the WP:N requirement for a stand alone article so that Wikipedia remains an encyclopedia and WP:NOT a free advertising platform or free fan wiki.

    Your agenda appears to be one to keep promoting items which enhance the visibility of the franchise for which you write and publish, which is an agenda which is specifically prohibited. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:20, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free media (File:NinniesCoverObverseBooks, 2013.jpg)

    edit

      Thanks for uploading File:NinniesCoverObverseBooks, 2013.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 09:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Iris Wildthyme Series 1, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stephen Chance and Michael Hobbs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

    It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gary Oliver, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Robinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

    It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 29 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yootha Joyce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason King (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

    It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

    September 2013

    edit

      Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edittoAdventure story may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

    List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

    Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:59, 23 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adventure story (television), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Russell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

    It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 24 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited V-2 Schneider, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All Saints (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

    It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 17 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

     
    This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
    StuartDouglas (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
    80.238.8.128 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

    Block message:

    Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Jasond1988". The reason given for Jasond1988's block is: "Vandalism-only account".


    Decline reason: That block appears to be set only to prevent account creation. Registered accounts should still be able to edit from that IP. What message do you see when you try to edit? — Daniel Case (talk) 19:02, 17 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

    File:Pbohfront.jpg listed for deletion

    edit

    A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pbohfront.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 20:33, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thirteen Against Fate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

    It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Slaves of Solitude, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Lodge and Daily Herald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

    It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:Big blockade.jpg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:Big blockade.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:08, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

    Someone else nominated this, but didn't alert you.

    edit

    [1]. 41.132.48.255 (talk) 05:54, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

    Nomination of Timothy combe for deletion

    edit
     

    A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timothy combe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

    The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy combe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

    Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tinton5 (talk) 19:31, 11 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Obverse Books, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dale Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

    It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

    ArbCom elections are now open!

    edit

    Hi,
    You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:Ben poster.JPG

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:Ben poster.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:Dickturpin tv.jpg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:Dickturpin tv.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

    ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

    edit

    Hello, StuartDouglas. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

    The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

    If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

    ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

    edit

    Hello, StuartDouglas. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

    The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

    If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

    ArbCom 2017 election voter message

    edit

    Hello, StuartDouglas. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

    The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

    If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

    Ann Sears moved to draftspace

    edit

    An article you recently created, Ann Sears, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:57, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Ann Sears (November 1)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
    This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    so she played a nurse in The Bridge on the River Kwai? How does that make her notable? Needs more sources to meet WP:ENT
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
    AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:10, 1 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
     

    Hello, StuartDouglas! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:10, 1 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

    ArbCom 2018 election voter message

    edit

    Hello, StuartDouglas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

    The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

    If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

    ArbCom 2019 election voter message

    edit
     Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

    The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

    If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

    Last warning

    edit

    You are adding poorly written and cited information and ignoring the fixes. This is the last warning before you get a WP:3RR ban. −αΣn=1NDi[n][Σj∈C{i}Fji[n − 1]+Fexti[(n^−1)] 20:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Sorry - just who the hell are you, and what were you babbling about? StuartDouglas (talk) 16:46, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Nomination of Jeremy Hoad for deletion

    edit
     

    A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeremy Hoad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

    The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Hoad (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

    Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parrot of Doom 21:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

    ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

    edit
     Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

    The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

    If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:DandyDick.jpg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:DandyDick.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Proposed deletionofHarry Stone (footballer)

    edit
     

    The article Harry Stone (footballer) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

    While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

    You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

    Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 09:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

    Proposed deletionofHarry Stone (footballer)

    edit
     

    The article Harry Stone (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

    Delete per failure of WP:NFOOTBALL

    While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

    You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

    Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:Sideways Door.jpg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:Sideways Door.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:Goofy baseball.jpg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:Goofy baseball.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

    Nomination of Kelly Hale for deletion

    edit
     
    A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelly Hale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

    The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Hale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

    Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

    SL93 (talk) 20:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:Caneandmabel.jpg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:Caneandmabel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott Liddell (December 1)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aviram7 was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:30, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott Liddell (December 10)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    With the possible (?) exception of the first one, none of the sources meets the WP:GNG standard. I also don't see anything there that would obviously satisfy WP:CREATIVE, either.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:Scott Liddell

    edit

      Hello, StuartDouglas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Scott Liddell, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)Reply


    Add topic

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StuartDouglas&oldid=1223327214"
     



    Last edited on 11 May 2024, at 11:06  


    Languages

     



    This page is not available in other languages.
     

    Wikipedia


    This page was last edited on 11 May 2024, at 11:06 (UTC).

    Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Terms of Use

    Desktop