![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 |
TheFarix,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 20:04, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Hi, you left an message claiming that I didn't provide a reliable source for an edit about the English episode titles. I provided a reference to the official website for the show which uses those English titles (certainly more than just referring to Crunchyroll.) If you're objecting to the claim that the episode titles are rock song titles (from the 60s and 70s), that is also obvious and apparent, though I admit the Ramones song "We Want The Airwaves" came out in 1981. "Happiness is a Warm Gun" is not a random phrase, and nor are the other titles, and there is no chance that they were randomly selected. That is less in need of verification and citation than the user written plot summaries. --John Thacker (talk) 19:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
It is with deep sincerity I apologise to you about the incident earlier, hope I'll take note of it in the future. I mean I'm not really an experienced editor, please do not take any action against me. If I have offended the rules of the wiki, you can talk with me to sort things out. Thanks.--Hongqilim (talk) 23:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
After working in the S-CRY-ed articles, I've been wondering whether the title should be. Before I've got here the main article was written "s-CRY-ed" rather than "S-CRY-ed". Should I move the articles to change the first capital letter? After the guild copyedits it, I planned to nominate the main article to GA but I find this more important. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 15:13, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
I put this in my edit summary, but I'll post this here on your talk page, too, for further clarification. Mr. Solusod's has an official website, as many VAs do. Here is the link. On the top right corner, you see links to his SNS accounts, such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. Clicking on the link his Twitter leads viewers to his official Twitter account. In fact, he primarily uses his Twitter to announce various roles he stars in anime and the like (which you can see from even his tweets), hence the fact that many fans know this is a verified account. It is 100% verified.--68.11.91.158 (talk) 23:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello TheFarix,
I don't know if you're aware of this, but an editor, whom is now banned, moved all of the Bleach seasons to a new name the same way as I did yesterday. [1] Where those moves discussed? If not, I'd figure that you would take action. -- 1989 (talk) 13:09, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello TheFarix,
Do you think that I should open a peer review for this list? I planned to so there could be a discussion for how it can improve for FL. -- 1989 (talk) 14:12, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
There is a mystery afoot in that I didn't make those changes to the template. If I had, it would have been in my edit summary. Do you have any idea how this might have happened? Or what my next steps should be? Thanks Bobdog54 14:43, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Dear TheFarix,
Now look what you've done to my edits! Didn't you see I'm trying to edit something, because I never do anything wrong! Look, when I was trying to put a category called Revenge anime and manga, do you think that is a foolish joke? Here's this: Attack on Titan is about revenge, when Eren Yeager vows to kill all the titans. Afro Samurai is also about revenge when Afro avenges his father's death against Justice. And finally, Berserk (manga), when Guts seeks his revenge against Griffith.
I think you just made a mistake, is that correct? So, if you do that one more time, I'll get very angry! Christine Lim 13:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChristineLim155 (talk • contribs)
You have been making countless edits to articles removing references to Crunchyroll as a licensee, with the only justification given being half-assed copypastes with the ridiculous claim of "not the true licensee". This is easily verified as clearly wrong.
Please cease this disruptive behaviour.
240F:74:ABE:1:98E0:6814:6E9F:E28C (talk) 13:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
I'd very much appreciate it if you were to join the discussion at Talk:Bungo Stray Dogs after having reverted my edit to the article, seeing as I'm the only one who's in the discussion, even after initiating an RfC. –Matthew - (talk) 13:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
I posted in my talk page regarding my evidence as to who the Animax Squid Girl dubbers are and you haven't responded in a bit. Bear in mind that ANN doesn't let you post anything to their wiki without evidence and the dubs exist in (malware-ridden) files on forums for anime fans in India. Zontas (talk) 04:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Just to let you know, I undid this edit of yours because, after consultation with the actual beaky on Freenode, it turns out that said user is not, in fact, a magical girl, no matter how much that user might wish he or she were.--Ipatrol (talk) 05:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
I can't even used a voice actor's official website to confirm a voice role he did for the show? That source was taken directly from Mr. Micah Solusod's official website. Never mind. I don't feel arguing about this. Just forget about it.--68.11.91.158 (talk) 20:46, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Why did you revert the edit on Shinya Shokudō?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkmorpher (talk • contribs) 12:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
I disagree. Just the characters names thrown out there makes it difficult for newcomers to identify them. Also, for people who like rugby and are the demographic of this manga, they sure are important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.39.122.234 (talk) 13:44, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
"The source is disputed and has several clear errors." Anime News Network is a reliable source. The other licensees are also indicated through the Anime News Network. Where did you find the "errors"? Federal Chancellor (NightShadow) (talk) 18:12, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
This edit looks fine -- didn't see that the two press release sections had different titles. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 04:01, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
It appears that this edit to Aria (manga) (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aria_(manga)&diff=prev&oldid=407480753) placed Greek Letter Alphas in place of the standard A into the references at line 243 and 273, do you know what happened? For example in line 243, the text『ΑRIΑ The NΑTURΑL』was added but all four letters that look like the letter A are actually a greek Alpha (Α).Naraht (talk) 15:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Why do we have to use we have to use "real-life" organization names for each heading under characters? Like I said the other articles with the prior Pretty Cure series wasn't set up like this. Plus, I don't think we need to be reminded of who are the heroes/protagonists or villains/antagonists. I find it unnecessary.--ExplorerX19 (talk) 14:57, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Pokémon: The Movie 2000#Name romanizations. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 19:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello TheFarix, this is Nstepneski1 I'm here to tell you that CurlyWi and Lord Roem are editing the anime infoboxes from Fall 2016 and Winter 2017 placing Crunchyroll as the licensee using that ANN press release as their source a have gone through the Funimation simuldub shows replacing Funimation with Crunchyroll. I just though you should know since you and I both doubt the validity of the press release. I even tried to point out the press release's inconsistencies but they of course didn't listen. I even tried to contact Funimation regarding the issue via social media, I'm still waiting for a response. I want to undo their edits but I'm afraid they might report me if I do. Nstepneski1 01:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
I want to report an issue that's been going for the List of Inuyasha characters. For the last few days, I've trying to clean the page up since it was in desperate need for a clean-up. A user, however, is being disrupted by adding a speculative sentence based on her own bias and interpretation of a scene regarding Sesshomaru's feelings for Kagura. As a long-time fan of the series, I know a lot of shippers interpret Kagura's death to be romantic, but what is established in the series that Sesshomaru never reciprocated Kagura's romantic feelings for her, but felt compassion for her. That is fully stated in the series, and I can provide evidence of such. I have argued this point to User:211.206.249.42 (see edit history of the article, as well as both of our talk pages), but she persists to listen and revert my edit. I do not wish to get into trouble for edit warring, so I am bringing this issue to a member of the Wikipedia and asking for someone to mediate the situation.--68.11.91.158 (talk) 17:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank for for speaking the user. I don't know it will stop the person, but we shall see. Thank you very much.--68.11.91.158 (talk) 18:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
User:211.206.249.42 has refused to listen and is still persisting with her personal, biased interpretation.--68.11.91.158 (talk) 02:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
User:211.206.249.42 is still being unreasonably stubborn and bias. She keeps changing the word "compassion" to "feelings" to implicit romantic feelings, and despite my attempts to reason with her (see talk page), she has outright refused to provide any evidence whatsoever to her argument and persisted in her biased interpretation of the events. Her assumptions are very evident if you see the talk page. She has nothing to back her argument except for assumptions and her own biased interpretation. May I request you speak to User:211.206.249.42? She won't stop, and this will going to result in a full-blown edit war if nothing is done to stop her.--68.11.91.158 (talk) 12:22, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Editing from school here, but I did source on User:211.206.249.42's talk page, though I didn't give the URL links since she is perfectly capable of looking up those sources herself. Chapter 409 of the Inuyasha manga and The Final Act Episode 3. All this time, I've quoted the exact words provided in the series, translated accurately both in the English sub and dub, and even in the online scanlations. I have done nothing but iterally quoted the exact words spoken in the manga from the scene within question. These are the sources: English Sub FA Ep. 3 on the Viz Media site and its English Dub counterpart. I'd link you to the chapter, but scanlations aren't allowed on Wikipedia, right?
Can I request that the characters page for the series be protected?--137.30.208.232 (talk) 13:48, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Remove obsolete parameter Infobox animanga/Game using AWB)
The above edit summary used on a recent run of your bot-like editing seems to be entirely inaccurate in many cases. I only looked at a relatively small sample of the edits, but did not find a single instance which had anything to do with infobox parameters. Every one I looked at were just general fixes, and I wasn't able to fully convince myself that there's not some policy issues in the form of WP:COSMETICBOT involved. This is pretty much irritating at best, possibly a bot policy issue at worst (although I don't see a specific requirement in the general bot policy that summaries must be accurate, but I believe that bot cosmetic changes are generally prohibited by consensus). Either way, please use accurate summaries that truly reflect the changes made. Thanks.
Murph9000 (talk) 12:23, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for pointing out that I might not gave a accurate summary for the changes but the truth is I did gave a brief summary on why I delete that source for a another. I do not know why you said that did not gave a adequate summary but I did gave a detailed summary on the change. It is nothing personal but I strongly feel that D.F Smith from IGN might not be a reliable critic when reviewing certain products. Even if he is being positive or negative, I have stated in my brief summary on why I think he is not reliable because from what I have seen on his profile on Venture Beat he had receive several quarterly lay offs when working for IGN (sorry, but I cannot find that description on his profile that the information from anymore on Venture Beat for some reason, it might still be there or it is deleted from the looks of it) so I got the impression that he might be slacker or he does not act professional I feel he cannot be trusted. I am sorry but I need to revert the change you made but to make up for deleting that source I placed in another source from a professional website called DVD Talk that also does a lot of reviews on anime DVDs and Blu-rays. I understand you have accept harsh criticism but there some critics that cannot be mention because of their past history especially for a guy who as a history for being laid off several times, as I said its not personal or I might as well all the critical reviewers since I am biased. Also if I do leave any Grammar issues I might have left behind or my changes are still not justified then please notify me and I would do anything to improve it. — Preceding Hwest19 comment added by Hwest19 (talk • contribs) 02:54, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
As I said this is not personal reasons for why I remove this or not either that he left IGN or that the review is invalidate. Also I was not trying to remove any Carlo Santos or Anime News Network sources, I do not know why you said I did but I only meant to remove only D.F Smith's work. It is only one reliable source I replaced but I am not going to make a big deal of this and neither should you but I still going to at least put in the DVD talk article to expand the section, but if you have any problems with that then tell me on my or your talk page. But please stop removing all the changes I made it is not like I am trying to delete an entire section of a group of reviews but if you feel that even a critic that might or not reliable should remain listed for just this once then do what you want. — Preceding Hwest19 comment added by Hwest19 (talk • contribs) 03:35, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
I appreciate that but to left you known again I did not intend to remove Carlo Santos as a source it must been a accident and also I was not making up excuses for deleting notes from critics I do not like. I do understand that you trying to do the right thing which is why I stop deleting that source after thinking about it, but it not justifiable on excusing me on being selfish even though I thought I was doing the right thing too in my view. I thought there will be no problems I justify my changes and be willing for others to point out mistakes instead on making this change a big deal, but since you gave me the advice I needed there no need for us to get angry. I will follow your advice as long you leave me alone, I really hate to get into an argument over something like this. Also for future cases when I add stuff in I do make sure the sections I expand do not become bloated if you bring that up because I like to add in others sites from the net as a reliable source for anime reviews, not just just IGN and Anime News Network. Anyway there is no need to carry this discussion, your advice now would helpful enough for future cases on wikipedia. Goodbye. — Preceding Hwest19 comment added by Hwest19 (talk • contribs) 12:33, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Please follow official websites that show true character orders. It doesn't have to be who appeared first. In Dream Eater Merry, Merry Nightmare appeared first, and Yumeji Fujiwara appeared second. That scene takes place in Episode 1. Nintenchris5963 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Good afternoon. For a month there is a theme devoted to this. Besides this, I do not see a problem in this, since Miyuki being his own blood related sister is still his only love interest, and the whole romantic line is devoted to how she refers to her "forbidden" feelings for own brother. Yes, due to genetic manipulation, their connection is safe for their offspring, but the plot and characters do not doubt that with all this they are a full brother and sister. Solaire the knight (talk) 13:52, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
I need secondary sources for the fact that when a girl confesses her love for her own brother, and her brother says "well, I will try to love you as a woman," is this incest? Or that it is incest, when in the whole series the sister of the main character is his only love interest? Solaire the knight (talk) 20:24, 3 May 2017 (UTC)Even now, that feeling hasn’t changed. Even though I know that Onii- sama is my real brother, I want Onii-sama to treasure me as a woman! I want to be Onii-sama’ s bride! When I said I had given up, suddenly I didn’t want to give up!....But, Onii-sama is normal after all. . . You have a normal sense of moral too. . . You wouldn’t carry a romantic feelings for your own sister right. You must have been disgusted by such an abnormal sister like me. . Onii-sama, is it ok for me to hope? Not for ‘now’ but for ‘sometime’. For Onii-sama to be able to see me as ‘Miyuki’, and not your sister.
Would saiyanisland be an alight reference for the episodes I added. Nuobgu (talk) 22:48, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Why would you want to remove the phrase "The main protagonist of the series." as you did in Mikagura School Suite and Good Luck Girl!? If you remove that phrase, people won't know who's the protagonist and end up being confused. Same for the "main antagonist" phrase at Isuca. And it's better off going for the anime order as seen in official websites. And if you say that Shinichirou is the viewpoint character, add the phrase "The main protagonist of the series.", just like it says on the official website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.62.190.18 (talk) 21:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Here's the source. Here's the talk page in which no one bothered to answer my question. Avengingbandit 02:11, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi. You reverted my edit, and gave your reason as "Huh?". Would it be possible for you to be more specific as to your reasoning for the revert? Thanks. – Reidgreg (talk) 21:21, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi uh I'm fairly new to Wikipedia and have only done one edit so far (on the Italian profanity page). Can you give me some tips on how to improve my profile Summary? Dinah Kirkland (talk) 20:58, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi TheFairix, With great difficulty I had found the original story and inspiration behind Crayon Shin-chan. I would like to know why do video interviews aired on television are considered as "unreliable sources". Sometimes I feel we on Wikipedia are going against our own common sense. I would appreciate if you can also come to the talk page on Crayon Shin-chan. Thank You. Anwesh pati (talk) 12:46, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Anwesh pati (talk) 08:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
I have 2 reasons why I'm changing character orders, but I'm only gonna tell you 1 of them. I'm seriously sick of boys as main protagonists. I mostly want girls as main protagonists. So I want to change character orders the way I want. I want a girl listed first and I want a boy listed second. Also, if I'm playing an anime game that is both visual novel and multiplayer fighting or both visual novel and RPG, I'll always play as a girl. Just like The Asterisk Wars: Houka Kenran is both visual novel and multiplayer fighting game. The game have both story mode and battle mode. In story mode, the main protagonist is Ayato Amagiri, and the heroines are playable in story mode as well but during team battles only. In battle mode, the player can choose which character he/she wants. For me, I'll always choose girls as my playable characters, and I'll always choose boys as my opponents. And there's Fushigi no Gensokyo 2: Miracle Party, a Touhou game that is both visual novel and RPG game. The protagonist is Sanae Kochiya, but the true protagonist from all of Touhou is Reimu Hakurei. Touhou has a lot of female characters and only a few male characters. The creator of Touhou, ZUN, always wanted to make girls as playable and enemy characters and boys as NPCs. That the first reason why I'm changing character orders. I have a second reason, but I'm not gonna tell you my second reason because I was afraid that you were going to do something that might offend me as well. Nintenchris5963 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:52, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
You had a talk question on the Hetalia Axis Powers List of Characters page and I wanted to ask if you think I could put in human names of if I did it would be considered vandalism? Dinah Kirkland (talk) 15:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Ja they are but Hima-Papa (the creator) gave some human names. Dinah Kirkland (talk) 15:23, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
I... don't understand Dinah Kirkland (talk) 15:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
They were never used but I thought since the creator gave them to the characters I could put them in. Dinah Kirkland (talk) 15:59, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Some people want to know their names so it would be relevant I guess. Dinah Kirkland (talk) 16:44, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Alright. I'll do some research and see if they were used in the webcomic. Dinah Kirkland (talk) 17:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Why are you removing original researches as you did in Prince of Stride. Nana is officially called the main protagonist in the visual novel, and Riku is officially called the main protagonist in the anime. The word『主人公』means "protagonist", and they need original researches; otherwise, people will be confused. Are you willing to remove original researches in Aokana: Four Rhythm Across the Blue as well?
Can you please explain to me how the most recent versions of my edits to "BanG Dream!" inflict with copyrights, and/or constitute to the nature of plagiarism of Crunchyroll content. The wording has been made completely different, and there is absolutely no way that comparisons between the descriptions on the page and those on that site would ever/could ever be drawn. Not only is the wording on plot content their descriptions cover completely different, but the edits I made include plot information that their descriptions don't. No harshness intended hereIf I'm in the wrong, which I may very well be, then that's fine. I simply do not understand what the issue actually is. --2A02:C7F:3A2B:3B00:3196:2F18:9A35:D543 (talk) 14:08, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
What default size? Making an image 255px is not "large". Those are the sizes of the images. The images were just fine. Unless I'm violating something, there should be no reason for you to start reverting. -- 1989 18:34, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
If correcting grammar and misspells are categorized as unproductive i think a lot of your edits can be reverted the was line which i changed "gets them match started" to "gets the match started" (thats why i marked it as minor edit)use your judgement and please review edits carefully before reverting them and please revert your edit. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by East alan (talk • contribs) 11:14, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
I have no idea why you're bringing that into your continued disruptive insertion of original research and poor writing in Btooom!. I couldn't care less about plot, and if you had taken the time to read edit summaries you would know that. But since you're an adult and have been here for a while, I'll run down the list of problems with this content again: a. it is unverified (duh--plot doesn't necessarily need verification, but『Upon meeting Ryōta in real life and discovering the truth about him, Himiko is able to overcome her fear of men』does need verification, since "...is able to overcome her fear" is obviously interpretation. So, b. it's original research as well. c. It's terribly poor writing (" Back then, he was competitive, good at everything, whether it be sports or grades, extremely popular with both guys and girls and always cheerful and somewhat insensitive"? " However, injury and despair later changes him"? How about this, which you have now twice taken ownership over: "She has a large forehead and is a cute 19-year-old girl".). d. It is completely excessive: they are not character descriptions but lengthy expositions that combine plot and original research more than anything else. e. Don't you have anything better to do than to reinsert third-grade fan stuff about cartoons? This is an encyclopedia--move your content over to Wikia.
Lest I wasn't clear, let me nail it down to just one thing: I have serious problems with your reinsertion of unverified content; please see Template:Uw-unsourced3. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Hey Farix, could you talk to JuiianPema and ask him to stop adding airdates to DBZ Kai, Lupin the Third Part IV, Iron Blooded Orphans, and JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Stardust Crusaders without sources. Nuobgu (talk) 06:11, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
please edit the other season of shippuden in english, save me time — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sin3dd (talk • contribs) 20:09, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Aren't there like 19 movies?
1. Dead Zone
2. The World's Strongest
3. The Tree of Might
4. Lord Slug
5. Cooler's Revenge
6. Return of Cooler
7. Super Android 13!
8. Broly: The Legendary Super Saiyan
9. Bojack Unbound
10. Broly Second Coming
11. Bio-Broly
12. Fusion Reborn
13. Wrath of the Dragon
14. Bardock: The Father of Goku
15. The History of Trunks
16. Plan to Eradicate the Saiyans
17. Resurrection 'F'
18. Battle of the Gods
19. Yo! Son Goku and His Friends Return!!
This page is slightly outdated but is it worth enough to change it? Dinah In Wonderland 17:48, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
I mean for this specific page Dragon Ball Z it doesn't state all the movies. It says I believe "there are 17 movies" when there are 19 (including all specials.) So I was wondering if it should be changed. Dinah In Wonderland 17:57, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Nevermind I just saw that on the page it says this. I apologize for taking up your time. Dinah In Wonderland 17:59, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
I keep on getting problems with users Diogatari, UnknownUsername480 and IP 151.35.129.246 over changing the picture in the infobox. I want it to be updated and the pesky low-res logo removed for good, but those people keep on popping it back like annoying Angels invading Central Dogma! I replaced that with the official JP BluRay Box cover since the small logo won't cut it anymore in Wikipedia. DO something!--BlackGaia02 (talkpage if you dare) (talk) 00:55, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Dragon Ball Z Kai: The Final Chapters airs every Saturday night at 11:30 PM on Adult Swim's Toonami block. The next episode will air on August 5, 2017. You are incorrectly reverting a correct edit. View the schedule for that day here: http://adultswim.x10.mx107.77.223.198 (talk) 22:41, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
http://www.adultswim.com/toonami/107.77.223.198 (talk) 23:02, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
107.77.223.198, can you wait until they have officially added the new episode to TV listings like Zap2It? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:29, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
I noticed you edited a lot of articles on May 21 to change the order of "television anime" to "anime television". "Television anime" is the correct order, "television" is modifying "anime"; it's to differentiate it from an OVA (original video animation) or net animation or something. So unless there was some discussion elsewhere where it was agreed to swap "television anime" to "anime television", the edits should be undone. Z-ch94 (talk) 04:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Persona 5 Game Gets TV Anime Series... the Persona 5 game is getting a television anime series
The project inspired the first television anime season in 2013
TV Anime 'Dagashi Kashi' Receives Second Season
At the Osaka performance it was announced that a new TV anime, Wake Up, Girls! Shinsho, will be broadcasted on TV Tokyo from October 2017.
PLEASE NOTICE AGAIN !! https://www.mangazenkan.com/ranking/books-circulation.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zainabalbasri (talk • contribs) 20:46, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
another site http://entamedata.web.fc2.com/hobby/book_comiall.html sorry but your informations are not correct ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zainabalbasri (talk • contribs) 20:54, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Good day i am sorry i did not source my work i never edit wiki before and do not plan to do to much of it after i finish updating all the english aired episodes of Naruto Shippuden here is where i sourced all my info from if you are able to put the source into the work i have done and put it back up that would be great thank you Source: http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_Animated_Media#Naruto:_Shipp.C5.ABden — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.101.244 (talk) 00:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
So I noticed that the various mecha anime have been changed back to their previous states before I edited them.
The reason I made these edits was because I wanted to distinguish real and super robots from the numerous mecha anime series. And, based on the information I got before I edited them, I could not tell for myself if any of them are either real robots or super robots.
So why can't I distinguish real and super robot series from each other if it's to help me figure out which subgenres each of those mecha anime came from? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Commander PonyShep (talk • contribs) 18:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Farix, I noticed you've been reuploading manga covers sourced from MAL. The thing is, it's not really a big deal. It doesn't matter where you get a fair use image from because you're using it for your own purposes with an actual fair use rationale, not engaging in copyvios. Linking to MAL also isn't a big deal because I can guarantee you no one at all clicks on file description pages through to MAL, and all external links on WIkipedia are nofollow, so it doesn't raise MAL's search engine rank either. It just seems petty to me to reupload a brand new image when there's nothing wrong with the old one. If the MAL links bother you so much, just delete the link in the future, though personally I find it's important to be honest about your sources no matter where on WIkipedia and I've even cited a copyvio YouTube video because the alternative was a citation no one would ever bother checking. Don't be overly committed to the rules to the point that you're doing redundant work is my point. Opencooper (talk) 18:09, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
The sources, e. g. book, are set now at List of hentai anime and STAR jewel, look 'round. SBarT (talk) 08:43, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you reverted the changes to the Super robot and Real robot categories. However, my changes to the category are verifiable, and the article on mecha anime and manga confirms that my additions to both category descriptions are correct based on reliable sources.
As far as the mecha articles go, you are correct in that some of them are unverifiable from the article, so I erred in thinking those could just be added without any references stating that. However, some of them, such as Evangelion and Armored Trooper Votoms, have indeed been described as super or real robot in reliable sources, which are also mentioned in mecha anime and manga, as a series, rather than as individual works of fiction. I'm not sure what the protocol is in this case, because quite frankly having to prove that literally every Evangelion anime is a super robot anime is somewhat ridiculous to ask, when it's already clear that it is.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
How is it fair that numerous pages on this site can go unsourced when it comes to the genre? You have a strange obsession with The Big O article I feel.--Valkyrie Red (talk) 06:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#Sources for PreCure voice actors. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 08:55, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Not sure if you got my ping (they're not working for some people: phab:T177825) at Template talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#Why doesn't this template use WPBannerMeta?. Basically I've had some people ask about why page assessments aren't showing up in XTools, and this apparently is why. Regards — MusikAnimal talk 22:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
{{#assessment}}
function, but setting it up correctly is a bit complicated. You need to pass it the project name, class, and importance, but you have to first filter the class and importance through masking templates so that the output is consistent (i.e. to normalize and validate the strings). You also have to set up separate {{#assessment}}
entries for the task forces/work groups and pass the main project name as the parent parameter. All of this has been set-up already in the {{WPBannerMeta}} template that all the other WikiProjects are using. I know that {{WPBannerMeta}} used to be very rigid in its functionality, but you can now override pretty much anything that it does, including the importance display and category scheme (via hooks). In fact, some of these customization features were made specifically to accommodate WikiProject Anime and manga. Is there anything specifically blocking migration to the meta template? If there are still legitimate blockers, I can work on integrating the parser function into {{WikiProject Anime and manga}}, but I think that might be more work than just switching to {{WPBannerMeta}}. Kaldari (talk) 06:59, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
If that's the case, why haven't you provided sources for the other two genres listed on The Big O's page: i.e. Mecha and Neo-Noir. Why are you obsessed with just tech noir when the other two are uncited.--Valkyrie Red (talk) 21:18, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Hey, listen, I'm not a licensed user, only because I don't know how, but I'm a passionate fan of Naruto and these airdates are correct, check the season pages' DVD releases section, these are when the episodes aired. Stop undoing my corrections. If it's due to a lack of source, here it is: http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_Animated_Media#Naruto:_Shipp.C5.ABden. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CCED:E980:6820:A989:5271:8CA6 (talk) 23:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Well, these episodes are available in ENGLISH!!! I'm trying to keep these pages updated since no one else seems to be updating them, I'm trying to help. THESE EPISODES ARE AVAILABLE IN ENGLISH!!! I'm only trying to help. Right now, the anime is dubbed up to Episode 416. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CCED:E980:6820:A989:5271:8CA6 (talk) 23:30, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Are you talking about airing in English on TV, cause Naruto: Shippuden is currently off the air, except for Toonami, which is far behind right now. If you're waiting for the Toonami airdates, then that's pointless because they won't airing for years and we should update this page with the info we currently have because occasional viewers of these pages should be aware that english versions of these episodes have already been released. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CCED:E980:6820:A989:5271:8CA6 (talk) 23:37, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Look, we can keep going all day and night and still not get anywhere. I'm really considering getting an official account now since this Wiki keeps deleting all of my factually correct corrections. Instead of treating me as an outside threat, we should both want to see this page kept up to date and managed the way it should be. Plus, I don't understand your explanation of "field and column" or "FirstEngAirDate and English air date". It doesn't make any sense whatsoever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CCED:E980:6820:A989:5271:8CA6 (talk) 23:45, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Then by your logic, that would mean that all of the previous episodes have not aired in English, so technically, according to your logic, that means the anime has only aired up to 140 or something. This is what you are telling me. Also, I'm gonna keep messing with your Big O page until we can reach a reasonable compromise. Enjoy! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CCED:E980:6820:A989:5271:8CA6 (talk) 23:51, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
I know they aired on Disney XD, but Neon Alley is a streaming service, which means it has no precise air date for various episodes. The show aired on XD up until Season 4-6. It was cancelled early and has since not aired on TV, so there are no other further airdates for the rest of the episodes. Streaming Services don't count, right? That's what you said, according to your logic, am I wrong? You said that since they have no English air dates, then they don't count, which is why you keep edit-blocking me, right? Why don't we try to find a solution and end this little spat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CCED:E980:6820:A989:5271:8CA6 (talk) 00:01, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I'm afraid but could you please refrain from just reverting/ deleting others' contributions before having a conversation and trying to reach consensus? For example, at Banana Fish. We should avoid an edit war. If you like and respect that manga, could you cooperate with us in them? I suggest you should do a reversion more carefully and have a conversation before an attempt at it and look over policies and guidelines not only the original research part but especially linked pages above. Thanks. --Wickych (talk) 07:19, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi - you reversed my edit on Sailor Moon (not using IMDb as a source). I didn't know that was the case and wanted to say thanks. Not sure if this is how to do it but kittens are cute and I hope you agree! Thanks again for your help.
Good Day, Dear User TheFarix !
Today, I'm actually talking to you, because I wanted to know if you really read what was written on the article's talk page ( here : Talk:Haruhi_Suzumiya#End_of_light_novels.3F ) before doing you edit : [5] ... Or not ? If that's not the case, will you, please, mind to read it ? If you read it, will you please mind to answer me : why did you revert my edit in which I placed a "dubious" ? The case is that, according to haruhi's wikia ( [6] ), there were an anouncment of a sequel in a book called The Observation of Haruhi Suzumiya . So, I ask you, please, talk BEFORE doing such things such as removing a "dubious" flag. At least, I ask you to leave a message on the article's talk page, so the other users can understand your edits. Please. By the way, I'm actually not reverting your edit, because before doing some things, I think it is actually needed to talk (to you). Sorry for my poor grammar, I was quite in a hurry and english's not really my native language (but I do love it !). Hoping for an answer from you. Nota Bene : It is possible, if you try to talk to me, that it will take some time for me to answer, I'm quite busy now. Just in case, be prepared to wait. I feel sorry for that. -- Evachan39 (talk) 10:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi TheFarix
Could you hold off on the templates on User talk:Tokyowaterfront for now - I'm going to hide them all (not delete!) as I want to see if the user will actually read his talk page, and I don't want to bury the message amidst a pile of CFD templates. I do understand the templates all need to be posted to follow CFD rules, but could you maybe leave it til the 24 hours are up? Would be appreciated. Thanks, fish&karate 12:51, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
what is raison for delet new poster mana volume 23 anwar call me 22:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أنور (talk • contribs)
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.
The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:
If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.
Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 18:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, TheFarix.
As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors, |
Hello, TheFarix. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello ! Just in case you don't renember here is the previous thread : User_talk:TheFarix/Archive_17 I wanted to add few things... Sorry for the wait, I'm quite busy... Anyway, let's back to the topic :
"There has been no new light novels published since 2011" Yeah, I know.
"you did not present any reliable sources that stated that a 12th volumes will be published" I want to be quite obvious on this point : I do NOT present anything at all. I never said (or if so, or if it's what you've understood, I'm quite sorry about this... I admit I could have been more obvious in the beginning...) that I checked if what was said on Haruhi's wikia was true : I did not read The Observation of Haruhi Suzumiya to check if it was truly written that there will be a sequel... Mainly because I did not. To put it in a nuthsell : the point is that you seem to misunderstand (and I admit that I'm partially guilty of this...) : the source I wanted to be for the "It is unclear if there will be a sequel or not." sentence ([7]) is The Observation of Haruhi Suzumiya, and absolutely NOT Haruhi's wikia. I wished that someone could just go, read that book and say if it's true... Or not. So we can add it for a source of the sentence.
"(and frankly, Wikia is not a reliable source)" I agree on that with you, since it's not really a reliable source, as you said previously.
"Even if a 12th volume was planned, it does not change the fact that it wasn't published and nor have any new volumes been published in the last 6 years." Well, of course, you're right, if so, we wouldn't have to talk about that.
"The series is over until there is an announcement that a new volume will be published." What I mean, is that if there is something that say that there will be a next book in The Observation of Haruhi Suzumiya, could we not just see it as a source ? Why not ?
"Also, when an edit is clearly based on bad information, there is no requirement that the edit be discusses first before it is reverted." I will be frank : that : "clearly based on bad information" is your point of view. And I don't necessary agree with it...
"The WP:BURDEN is on you to provide a source." Well, I think you're right... And to avoid further problems about this, I suggest that we leave the things as you've done, and wait for someone checking this damn book (The Observation of Haruhi Suzumiya)... What do you think of that ?
"If I didn't revert you, Juhachi or another editor would have." Once again, that is clearly your point of view. And I don't necessary agree with it.
Have a good day, -- Evachan39 (talk) 19:44, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Akira (1988 film) | |
What should I Do? I just Wanted to Make it Perfect and Good like Wikipedia wants to Be Impressive. I've tried my Best to Make Verifiable content like I wanted to Do. So, What Should I Do? JordanBatista (talk) 21:28, 10 December 2017 (UTC) |
Well when it comes to genres like Philosophical fiction and tragedy they are not within the mindset of majority of humans. They don't explicitly get labeled to anything is because the terms have been underused that no one goes out of their way to label works as Tragedies of Philosophical fiction because not many know these genres exist or the correct definition to label something as such. The animes I edited fall almost completely into those genres. Only things that exist are those that imply that they're Philosophical or Tragic, but don't label as such despite the qualities. So, if you're asking for something that explicitly labels them these genres then I won't have anything that will ever satisfy you. So, how do I get the ball rolling on what indicates Philosophical fiction or Tragedy since all I will ever have are implication based. Also Philosophical themes are pervasive throughout Neon Genesis Evangelion and Fate/Zero. While Puella Magi Madoka Magica was created by the staff and Urobuchi himself with tragic themes. As it is one of the main genres Urobuchi regularly writes as he is well known for Tragedy. I believe Tragedy and Philosophical fiction should be given more recognition since shows like Rick and Morty are coming into existence now. Is there a way you can meet me half way? Also many animes are labeled genres on their wiki without references. Why are you specifically targeting Urobuchi's work? If your criteria are references then nearly all animes shouldn't be listed with any genres on their wiki. Urobuchi himself recognises his works as Tragedies because that's what he's going for. IceBrotherhood (User talk:IceBrotherhood) 13:20, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, there isn’t really much coverage online about it, only some YouTube videos and TV schedules of Cartoon Network India mentioning it as CN India aired the show quietly without advertising it at all. So I can’t really give a source for this. But DB Super airing on CN India is true. User 261115 (talk) 12:05, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew is wishing you a Merry Christmas!
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
FLCL, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Why would be completely unnecessary to give number of chapters? --Mazewaxie 11:03, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, TheFarix.
I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged. |
Sorry but why were you renaming it? The trademark clearly states that all of these words are in capital letters. See the Twitter account and Official Website of Tsuburaya productions.
Zero stylinx (talk) 03:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)