The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Approved for trial (50 edits or 30 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete.. @JJMC89: there may be some removals in a few days - need someone to run and pass an RfA too, get to nominating :D. A few questions too:
If 'membership is required' and non-group members get added, how often will they be removed?
Can you add a parameter to "skip users in groups" (e.g. no need to add users that are +sysop, +bot).
I don't think it's necessary to remove users from the admin messaging list upon removing their rights. Isn't one reason for the list to keep inactive sysops up to date so when they return they have something to bring them up to speed? –xenotalk16:27, 28 February 2017 (UTC)I was confused about the what list was being updated[reply]
Normally they are only removed for continuing inactivity, I'm generally against maintaining mass-messaging to editors that have left the project - it normally just clutters up their ignored talk page. — xaosfluxTalk02:28, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.