The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Approved for trial (25 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete.Magioladitis (talk) 16:01, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Trial complete.25 edits. I didn't see any issues. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Approved for extended trial (250 edits or 7 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete.@JJMC89: I'd like to see this run for a bit longer before this review is over. — xaosfluxTalk 15:29, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Trial complete. The bot edited as intended: 216 edits and 16 edits. Some portals are not properly configured, see below. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:57, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Portal configuration issues
Source page does not exist (errors in logs)
Incorrect source page or source page not properly configured
@JJMC89: regarding the ones with errors - what is the course of action - proceed, skip, fix, something else? — xaosfluxTalk 01:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Xaosflux: If the source page doesn't exist, the bot doesn't edit or log it on the list of maintained pages. (I deactivated the ones above during the trial so that it was easier to check the logs for other problems.) The bot doesn't check if the source page is properly configured, so it will check for changes and update accordingly. (I can deactivate these as well.) In all cases, the portal maintainers are responsible for proper configuration locally and at enwikinews. I will drop notes on the portal talk pages noting deactivation. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.