Category:Alliance '90/The Greens
edit
-
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
-
The result of the discussion was: rename all. – Fayenatic London 21:23, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
-
Nominator's rationale: In addition to the related subcategories, request renaming because the main article associated with the party was moved to a title without the apostrophe. Mélencron (talk) 21:43, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
-
OK, there seems to be consensus for renaming several categories. Any admin there? --Fadesga (talk) 11:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Dominican Republic people of Ashkenazic-Jewish descent
edit
-
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
-
The result of the discussion was: mergetoCategory:Dominican Republic people of Jewish descent. The article makes no mention of the person being Ashkenazi, so it would not be appropriate to also merge to the other parent Ashkenazi Jews. I will nominate the sibling Category:Dominican Republic people of Sephardic-Jewish descent. – Fayenatic London 21:51, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
-
Nominator's rationale: rename to align with other fooish-Jewish descent categories, where fooish refers to nationality, see grandchild categories of Category:People of Jewish descent by nationality. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:18, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
-
-
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Topographers
edit
-
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
-
The result of the discussion was: keep (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 05:43, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
-
Nominator's rationale: Largely common fields. Maybe could be renamed to Category:Topographers Surveyors.Vagrand (talk) 17:30, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Articles with Infobox holidays
edit
-
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
-
The result of the discussion was: soft delete. – Fayenatic London 10:00, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
-
Nominator's rationale: The category apparently exists only to note the use of the template. That information is easily checked with "What links here" and does not need a category. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
