● Home  

● Random  

● Nearby  



● Log in  



● Settings  



● Donate  



● About Wikipedia  

● Disclaimers  



Wikipedia





Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam/Assessment





● Project page  
● Talk  


● Language  

● Watch  

● Edit  


< Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam
  

Al-Islam Wikiproject

Al-Islam Portal What is Islam? Indices Wikiproject Categories
Main pageAssessmentMembersArticlesNew articlesPortalHelp

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Islam! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles related to Islam. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Islam}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Islam-related articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

WP:Islam article rating and assessment scheme
(NB: Listing, Log & Stats are updated on a daily basis by a bot)
Current detailed listing of Islam articles by quality
Daily log of status changes
Current Statistics
Islam-related articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 1 8 9 15 33
FL 1 1 2
FM 17 17
A 1 1
GA 6 13 39 79 13 150
B 72 97 232 410 89 900
C 109 144 416 1,541 1 279 2,490
Start 42 88 449 3,531 1 894 5,005
Stub 8 11 204 2,956 773 3,952
List 1 12 114 180 3 35 345
Category 1 1 5,444 5,446
Disambig 1 3 122 1 127
File 2 43 45
Portal 330 330
Project 113 113
Redirect 6 16 46 149 650 867
Template 1 478 479
NA 2 4 6
Other 1 106 107
Assessed 246 391 1,514 8,868 7,312 2,084 20,415
Unassessed 1 1 28 630 660
Total 246 392 1,515 8,896 7,312 2,714 21,075
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 61,694 Ω = 4.92
 FA A GABCStartStub FLListCategoryDisambigDraft FMFilePortalProjectRedirectTemplateNA???Total
3311509002,4905,0053,95223455,44612710817453301138664792166021,090
WikiProject Islam  articles by quality     Refresh
WikiProject Islam Articles by importance (refresh)
 Top  High  Mid  Low  NA  ??? Total
 246  393  1,515  8,897  7,325 2,716  21,092 


Frequently asked questions

edit
How do I add an article to the WikiProject?
Just add {{WikiProject Islam}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
How can I get my article rated?
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles?
Any member of WikiProject Islam is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating?
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective?
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Requesting an assessment

edit

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the peer review department (not yet available) instead. Please archive requests that are complete.

New requests

edit

Please place new requests (in the format, # [[article name]] -- ~~~~) at the bottom of the list.

@Al Ameer son: how do you think this one? It seem it received GA in another Wikiprojects, but i think there is still lack some inline citations. Ahendra (talk) 23:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Sultan.abdullah.hindi: The article structure is good for starter article. However, there are several issues as it seems Luqman still lacked in-line citation for references. there should be more renowned reliable references to be included in this article.Ahendra (talk) 23:26, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Instructions

edit

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Islam}} template banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax).

{{WikiProject Islam|class=XXX|importance=YYY}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Islam-related articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

The following values may be used for the importance parameter:

The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

Quality scale

edit
WikiProject article quality grading scheme
  • t
  • e
    • Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
     FA The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.

    More detailed criteria

    The article meets the featured article criteria:

    Afeatured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

    1. It is:
      1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
      2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
      3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
      4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
      5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
      6. compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarismortoo-close paraphrasing.
    2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
      1. a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
      2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
      3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
    3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
    4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.
    		 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. Jesus
     FL The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates.

    More detailed criteria

    The article meets the featured list criteria:
    1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
  • Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
  • Comprehensiveness.
  • Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
  • Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
  • Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
    		•  Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. The Twelve Imams
     A The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.

    More detailed criteria

    The article meets the A-Class criteria:
    Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).
    		 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. Al-Mu'tasim
     GA The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.

    More detailed criteria

    Agood article is:
    1. Well-written:
      1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
  • it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  • Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    2. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violationsorplagiarism.
  • Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  • Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  • Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  • Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
    		•  Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Hezbollah
    B The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.

    More detailed criteria

    1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
  • The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  • The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  • The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  • The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  • The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
    		•  Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Islamic calendar
    C The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.

    More detailed criteria

    The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
    		 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Aqidah
    Start An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.

    More detailed criteria

    The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
    • A useful picture or graphic
  • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
    		•  Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. Umrah
    Stub A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Ibn A'tham al-Kufi (as of December 2018)
    List Meets the criteria of a stand-alone listorset index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of mosques
    Category Any category falls under this class. Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized. Category:WikiProject Islam
    Disambig Any disambiguation page falls under this class. The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title. Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title. Islam (disambiguation)
    Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes. Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles. Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information. Template:WikiProject Islam

    Importance scale

    edit
    WikiProject article importance scheme
  • t
  • e
    • Importance Criteria Example
     Top Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international notability within their field. Islam
     High Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent. History of the Quran
     Mid Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area. Abrahamic religions
     Low Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article. Henry Stubbe
     NA Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc. Category:WikiProject Islam
     ??? Subject importance has not yet been assessed.

    Participants

    edit

    Please feel free to add your name to this list if you would like to join the assessment team (sign with ~~~ (3) instead of ~~~~ (4)).

    Recognised Islam-related content

    edit
    edit

    edit

    edit

    Good articles

    edit

    Former good articles

    edit

    Did you know? articles

    edit

    edit
    edit

    Good article nominees

    edit

    A-Class articles

    edit

    In the News articles

    edit

    Main page featured articles

    edit

    Main page featured lists

    edit

    Picture of the day pictures

    edit

    Good topics

    edit


    Log

    edit

    The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here.


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Islam/Assessment&oldid=1217486586"
      



    Last edited on 6 April 2024, at 02:53  


    Languages

     


    ●Bahasa Indonesia
      

     Wikipedia


    ●This page was last edited on 6 April 2024, at 02:53 (UTC).
    ●Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.


    ●Privacy policy
    ●About Wikipedia
    ●Disclaimers
    ●Contact Wikipedia
    ●Code of Conduct
    ●Developers
    ●Statistics
    ●Cookie statement
    ●Terms of Use
    ●Desktop