 | Before proposing or creating a new type of stub, please read How to propose a new stub type. |
WikiProject Stub sorting
| |
| Information | |
|---|---|
| Project page | talk |
- Stub types (sections)
|
talk |
- Stub types (full list)
|
talk |
- To do
|
talk |
- Naming conventions
|
talk |
- Redirects category
|
talk |
| Wikipedia:Stub | talk |
| Discussion | |
| Proposals (A) | talk |
- Current month
|
|
| Discussion | talk |
| Criteria (A) (discontinued) | talk |
| Deletion (Log) (discontinued) | talk |
| Category | |
|
| |
|
|
On this WikiProject Stub sorting subpage, you can propose new stub types (please read the procedures beforehand!), as well as the reorganization and subdivision of existing stub types. You can also discuss anything else related to stubs on the talk page.
Important: If you wish to propose the creation of a stub ARTICLE you've come to the wrong place. If you don't have a username yourself, please go to WP:AFC for proposing a new article. If you already have a username, you can create the article yourself. If you don't know how, add {{Helpme}} to your user talk page to request help from other editors. This page only deals with stub TEMPLATES and CATEGORIES; we cannot help you with creating articles.
| Proposing new stub types | ||
If you wish to propose a new stub category and template, please follow these procedures:
DO NOT place a proposal here for any stub type which has already been created and is being discussed at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. The proposal page is only for stub types that have not yet been created, and it is better to keep any discussion of such stub types in one place rather than splitting it between different pages. Wikipedia:Categories for discussion is the correct page for proposals to delete a stub type. ^ Good number means about 60 articles or more, or 30 or more if it is the primary stub type of a WikiProject, though this figure may vary from case to case. | ||
A stub type may be proposed for "speedy creation" if it meets one of the following criteria:
List speedy creation proposals in the same proposal listings as normal stub proposals below.
Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.
The result of the debate was create.
Category:Exoristinae stubs is currently large (823 articles), and some subcategories can easily be made from it:
Creating all three would bring the number in the Exoristinae category down to a more manageable 148 articles. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 21:32, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the debate was create.
Very similar to the above - Category:Tachininae stubs is large (744 articles, with no articles sortable into its existing subcategories) and has some subcategories that can be made from it.
Creating all of these subcategories would halve the size of the Tachininae category (from 744 to 369). Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 15:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi. There is the ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Post and philately stubs, which includes two well-populated templates: {{Postal-stub}} and {{Philately-stub}}. I propose to rename the ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Post and philately stubsas‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Postal system stubs (including {{Postal-stub}}), and afterwards create the ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Philately stubs (including {{Philately-stub}}). Best, Fadesga (talk) 22:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create as revised.
Currently contains over 800 articles. If we split by region:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the debate was do not create.
I think that Category:Antigua and Barbuda association football stubs should be created due to the amount of footballers, football league seasons, and football managers from Antigua and Barbuda who have articles which are stubs. WIKIPEDA (yes i meant to misspell it) (talk) 18:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the debate was do not create.
For better organization, I propose that Category:Philippine church stubs and Category:Philippine hospital stubs be created since several church and hospital articles are listed in Category:Philippine building and structure stubs. Sanglahi86 (talk) 18:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the debate was do not create.
IMO it would be convenient to have a stub category for members of Allotheria, a large extinct group of mammaliaforms. Most of the relevant articles are listed on this template. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 17:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
