Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2018-05-24/Humour

Play with your food: Down the rabbit hole into the realm of third-grade minds.

← Back to Contents

View Latest Issue

Play with Your food

•  PDF download

 E-mail

 Mastodon

 LinkedIn

 Facebook

 X (Twitter)

 Reddit

Warning: Some readers will find this article tasteless. I can understand this sentiment and you will feel better and less queasy by skipping it and leaving your comments afterwards.

Scared sober?

Spam sushi

Mudpies have other applications.

Would you accept this trophy?

It's not food, kids. Really.

We forget that a large numbers of our readers are boys who are bored. They are mired in school much of the of the day and can only fall into their default mischievous mode when they arrive in their computer lab at 10 am so their homeroom teacher can get a break. Vandalism rates also increase during this time slot. Why do you think the articles about female anatomy have such high page views, hmmm? I caught my boys plenty of times pretending they were doing something educational when they were actually studying the finer points of anatomy. I am NOT mocking any editors, cultures, genders, etc., etc., _etc. – I am a product of my Midwestern US culture and only propose that different types of food strike me as funny and incomprehensible.

Well, things probably haven't changed much, at least in my little corner of Western civilization. If Wikipedia had been around in the 1990s, you can bet my boys would be learning details about female anatomy and bathroom humor. They would have enjoyed Wikipedia's articles on food and nutrition while laughing their heads off while they read:

• Balute – The ducks are understandably worried and the chickens sigh deeply in relief.
• Soylent Green – Why not have some friends for dinner?
• Casu marzu – Not exactly the ketogenic diet but close.
• Honeypot ant – I am actually willing to try these. I don't anticipate that I will enjoy picking the little ant legs out between my teeth. These are so good that fans dig down two meters through the soil to find them.
• Hypoderma tarandi – A historical food, "tastes like milk" and its practice is supported by "Copious art dating back to the Pleistocene."
• Cendol – "[T]he swollen green worm-like rice flour jelly", counts as one serving of vegetables but only because it is green
• Mezcal – Not much of a disincentive for those who like tequila.
• Vincent M. Holt – Probably wasn't tasty himself but was a leader in lobster rights movement
• Sujuk – Keep tabs on your horse.
• Fermentation of unusual things – There are those who practice the fermentation of fish heads, walrus, sea lion, and whale flippers, beaver tails, seal oil, and birds. Then they wonder why they get botulism.
• Mud pie – I was disappointed to find this article was missing so I created it. Watch for pebbles breaking your teeth.^[1]
• Crazy-named food – This ancient dish is "compounded of all kinds of dainties, fish, flesh, fowl, and sauces."
• Chocolate Salty Balls – Imaginary, pop culture, detailed plot summary. External links to recipe sites might be an improvement.
• Cockle bread – Not really appropriate for the third graders.
• La Tomatina – I know Wikimania has already been hosted in Italy but ATTENTION all organizers we really need to go back there to participate in this event. It would be worth the inconsistency of rotating conference sites.
• Flies' graveyard – I don't care how good this is, I loose my appetite when I see these words put together.
• SPAM – This almost indescribable delicacy is highly appreciated in Hawaii. It is sometimes disguised as sushi. What are the ingredients again....
• Truffles – Though eating fungus is not unusual, the reasons pigs like them is interesting: "The female pig's natural truffle-seeking, as well as her usual intent to eat the truffle, is due to a compound within the truffle similar to androstenol, the sex pheromone of boar saliva, to which the sow is keenly attracted."
• World Pie Eating Championship – "In December 2014, pies of the wrong size were delivered to the event, while the intended pies were sent to a nearby divorce party."^[2][3][4]
• Goldfish swallowing – Encyclopedic tone but THIS version was much better. Just read the first paragraph. You will find it to be quite profound. If you can get past the first four sentences, good for you.
• Super Size Me – Despite all the pshaws from a well-known fast-food giant, you might want to stagger the meals you get at the drive-through over the course of a year rather than 30 days. See also: Happy meal.
• Don't eat this
• Rhinotillexis – "[Has] benefits for the human body.^[5] Friedrich Bischinger, an Austrian doctor specializing in lungs, advocates using fingers to pick nasal mucus and then ingesting it, stating that people who do so get "a natural boost to their immune system".^[5][6] The mucus contains a "cocktail of antiseptic enzymes that kill or weaken many of the bacteria that become entangled in it", so reintroducing the "crippled" microorganisms "may afford the immune system an opportunity to produce antibodies in relative safety".^[7]

In this issue

24 May 2018

From the editor

Op-ed

• I dunno if it's a good omen, starting the semi-revived Signpost out with a blatant copyright violation. Hilda, there, the gal stomping grapes, is from the 60's, not the 30s. 22:23, 24 May 2018(UTC) Qwirkle (talk) 22:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Qwirkle Are you sure about that? It is marked PD in Commons:

"Copyright has expired and its author is anonymous.

This applies to the European Union and those countries with a copyright term of 70 years after the work was made available to the public and the author never disclosed their identity."

If this is in error, please nominate it for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:29, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Qwirkle, 'semi'-revived? I would hesitate before belittling a lot of work that has been put in to reviving the last two issues by a team of mostly new contributors and editorial staff who think it's worth keeping going. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:46, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks boss for sticking up for me. I think Hilda might be notable enough for her own article. There really are some days when I actually feel semi-revived. Best Regards, Barbara ✐  ✉ 20:45, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know no more damning criticism, once people are past primary school, than praising something based on the input rather than the output. Qwirkle (talk) 15:11, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This suggests otherwise, don't it? American, not French, claimed, not anonymous, &cet. The good news is that if anyone gets in deep trouble the copyright owner is known for hiring from the pen.... Qwirkle (talk) 22:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Still likely to be PD if there was no copyright notice [1]. I don't see one there, nor on other stuff on the Internets, like a 1964 calendar. Probably you should take this up at Commons, though. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:40, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it, just to be on the safe side. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:42, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Every component piece of a work needn’t have a little circled ”cee” plastered on it, and just because you can find a copy of something with the signature airbrushed, or photoshopped, off doesn’t mean it is free for the taking. Qwirkle (talk) 15:11, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

US copyright law is complex. Read the Cornell link above (here it is again); until 1977 it did require a copyright notice. But this conversation should not be continued here. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:48, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No. US copyright law has never, ever required that every separable bit of a work be festooned with copyright warnings. A book might be marked once; that does not give the average yut on Wikipedia the right to excerpt all but that page as PD. Yes, copyright law is complex, but this aspect isn’t, and that primer doesn’t even pretend to address it. Qwirkle (talk) 17:08, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Deliciously gross — FR⁺ 12:01, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you really have to use the word 'deliciously'? I am quite queasy. Barbara ✐  ✉ 20:46, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Am I the only one to notice that València is not in Italy (Tomatina)?--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 15:25, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Newsroom

Subscribe

Suggestions

Languages