Home  

Random  

Nearby  



Log in  



Settings  



Donate  



About Wikipedia  

Disclaimers  



Wikipedia





Wit





Article  

Talk  



Language  

Watch  

Edit  





Wit is a form of intelligent humour—the ability to say or write things that are clever and typically funny.[1] Someone witty is a person who is skilled at making clever and funny remarks.[1][2] Forms of wit include the quip, repartee, and wisecrack.

"The feast of reason..."
James Gillray (1797)

Forms

edit

As in the wit of Dorothy Parker's set, the Algonquin Round Table, witty remarks may be intentionally cruel (as also in many epigrams), and perhaps more ingenious than funny.

Aquip is an observation or saying that has some wit but perhaps descends into sarcasm, or otherwise is short of a point. A witticism also suggests the diminutive.

Repartee is the wit of the quick answer and capping comment: the snappy comeback and neat retort.

Metaphysical poetry as a style was prevalent in the time of English playwright William Shakespeare, who admonished pretension with the phrase "Better a witty fool than a foolish wit".[3] It may combine word play with conceptual thinking, as a kind of verbal display requiring attention, without intending to be laugh-out-loud funny. Indeed wit in verse can be a thin disguise for more poignant feelings. English poet John Donne is the representative of this style.[4]

Other uses

edit

More generally, one's wits are one's intellectual powers of all types. Native wit—meaning the wits with which one is born—is closely synonymous with common sense. To live by one's wits is to be an opportunist, but not always of the scrupulous kind. To have one's wits about one is to be alert and capable of quick reasoning. To be at the end of one's wits ("I'm at wits' end") is to be immensely frustrated.[citation needed]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ a b "wit". Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 2012-05-27.
  • ^ "wit". Oxford Dictionaries. Archived from the original on July 19, 2012. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  • ^ Salingar, Leo (1976). Shakespeare and the Traditions of Comedy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 245–246. ISBN 978-0-521-29113-2.
  • ^ Daley, Koos (1990). The Triple Fool: A Critical Evaluation of Constantijn Huygens' Translations of John Donne. De Graaf. p. 58. ISBN 978-90-6004-405-6.
  • Bibliography

    edit

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wit&oldid=1231403201"
     



    Last edited on 28 June 2024, at 02:55  





    Languages

     


    العربية
    Deutsch
    Esperanto
    Français

    Ido
    עברית
    Lietuvių
    Português
    Русский
    Simple English
    سنڌي
    Українська

     

    Wikipedia


    This page was last edited on 28 June 2024, at 02:55 (UTC).

    Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Terms of Use

    Desktop