curprev22:3122:31, 12 March 2018 146.199.0.203talk 19,338 bytes+1,295 Source/etc revision pt2. Re-correcting links as per example of 884 Priamus. Replacing the direct citations for the inline data with links that actually point to the data rather than the related (but individually useless) journal articles, preserving links to said articles by moving them into the External Links section. There's less metadata in the latter case of course, but there should be more than enough information to preserve accessibility under any realistic sub-apocalyptic circumstance where Wikipedia itself still operates (and author names etc are present within the articles themselves), and the original metadata has been kept as HTML comments just in case. Also, as no (accessible) data could be found associated with the (in any case obsolete) WISE preliminary release (written here to 2dp), and the NEOWISE data only displays to 2dp (but has been written here to an excessive 3dp), the latter has been removed, but its citation tied to the former instead.undo
curprev22:2222:22, 12 March 2018 146.199.0.203talk 18,043 bytes+614 Correcting data and sources (and tidying the formatting and code), part 1, including removing the currently mysterious "Veres" citation (the link doesn't point to anything that can be used to verify the figure). Further edits lower down the page and to the reference list (to get rid of those angry red error messages) to come shortly, i.e. I'll be embarking on them immediately after hitting Publishundo
5 March 2018
curprev22:4722:47, 5 March 2018 Kheidertalkcontribs 17,429 bytes+210 <ref name="large-trojan2012">JPL Small-Body Database Search Engine: orbital class (TJN) and diameter > 50 (km) {{webarchive |url=http://archive.is/Ptox |date=13 Dec 2012}}</ref>undo
curprev22:3722:37, 5 March 2018 146.199.0.203talk 17,200 bytes0 Seems a bit odd picking the smallest of all the provided figures, when the more popular size appears to be over 160km and the arithmetic mean of all listed estimates (including the ellipsoid) is 146.8km... Going with nearest-integer rounding of the latter, therefore, as a hopefully acceptable compromise.undo
curprev22:3222:32, 5 March 2018 146.199.0.203talk 17,200 bytes+46 →Diameter and albedo: Giving a more direct comparison to the equivalent-diameter estimates of the other studies, as the roughly 4:2:1 relationship of the dimensions doesn't make it particularly obvious (...that it equates to a size somewhere between IRAS and the minimum of the others). Figure calculated from basic first principles for volume of ellipsoid and volume of sphere.undo
curprev22:2622:26, 4 March 2018 Kheidertalkcontribs m16,771 bytes−149 undo and edit: Then update THIS out-of-date article. All recent peer reviewed papers seem to use NEOWISE data. 164==>118undo
curprev20:1320:13, 4 March 2018 146.199.0.203talk 16,920 bytes+149 →Physical characteristics: Diomedes itself is a pretty egregious example. Table: 118km. Article: 164km. I'd see about dealing with it myself but I have no idea how to gain access to the transcluded data. (amusingly WP seems to think I've added an external link here... what?)undo
