curprev12:2812:28, 27 March 2018 Maczkopetitalkcontribs 19,550 bytes−65 Respelled /æn/ as "ann", as unstressed "an" can be misinterpreted as /ən/; removed pronunciation from opening already present in infoboxundo
curprev21:5821:58, 11 March 2018 146.199.0.203talk 19,537 bytes+1,696 Re-correcting links as per example of 884 Priamus. Replacing the direct citations for the inline data with links that actually point to the data rather than the related (but individually useless) journal articles, preserving links to said articles by moving them into the External Links section. There's less metadata in the latter case of course, but there should be more than enough information to preserve accessibility under any realistic sub-apocalyptic circumstance where Wikipedia itself still operates (and author names etc are present within the articles themselves), and the original metadata has been kept as HTML comments just in case. Also, as no (accessible) data could be found associated with the (in any case obsolete) WISE preliminary release (written here to 2dp), and the NEOWISE data only displays to 2dp (but has been written here to an excessive 3dp), the latter has been removed, but its citation tied to the former instead.undo
curprev03:1803:18, 6 March 2018 146.199.0.203talk 17,843 bytes+24 average of cited figures is a little over 107km, not 105km. hopefully i've remembered the right format for the convert tag.undo
curprev03:0103:01, 6 March 2018 146.199.0.203talk 17,500 bytes−37 however, that doesn't acquit the (neo)wise mis-cites. Perhaps there's a tiny URL hidden away in their PDFs as well, but it's almost 3am and I can't face up to looking for them. As the exact same data is also reported just as well by the JPL-SBD and can be revealed with a single click and no scrolling, it makes more sense to just swap those two useless sources for one already-existing valid one.undo
curprev02:5702:57, 6 March 2018 146.199.0.203talk 17,537 bytes0 So, after yet another look through the originally linked AKARI document, I spotted a teeny, tiny little footnote (literally) on one of the pages towards the end: the URL linking to the actual data. The rest of the document is utterly pointless for our needs re: properly sourcing the article data. The corrected URL here is the one from that footnote, and is the *actual* "ACUA" link. Unfortunately they don't make it easy for you, as what you get at the other end is a gZip archive that expands into a monolithic 391kb text file, with a non-windows CR/LF encoding... but, you can open it in notepad, and successfully search it... and, lo and behold, Antilochus is actually in there, with size/albedo/etc data plus sigmas. So looks like I'll be backtracking and adding this link into a whole mess of Trojan (and maybe other minor planet) articles now...undo
