curprev02:2602:26, 13 October 2022 2603:6010:11f0:3c0:4ee:e21f:8554:df50talk 117,590 bytes−149 Original sentence made very little and had nothing to do with ambiguity+possible original research. “Prurient” is hardly a necessary term for something as diverse as exploitation film and it’s presented as a binary of “aesthetic” to “prurient” that misrepresents information with the very article later on.undo