|
| ||
Index
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| For your work regarding the correction of wikilinks. |
JacktheBrown (talk) 10:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Vagina into Human vagina. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 18:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear colleague, please note that WP:Splitting says, with high-profile or sensitive articles, start a "Split" discussion on the article talk page, and consider informing any associated WikiProject(s). The articles you were splitting, Vulva and Vagina, are definitely "high-profile". Please avoid such drastic changes in the future without a thorough discussion. Sincerely, Викидим (talk) 19:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to The Merchant of Venice: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. See also [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. AbsoluteWissen (talk) 14:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Autisticeditor, you have just now reverted an edit I made on this topic, only a very short time after I made it. I wrote a very clear and complete explanation of my edit. You reverted it without comment. If you have a good reason for your reversion please say, otherwise I will redo my original edit. Thanks Bosula (talk) 17:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Autisticeditor, many thanks for your sterling efforts to improve Wikipedia with all those links. However, in articles like Animal and Domestication (and in biology and agriculture articles more generally), we definitely do not need links to common terms like "food", per WP:COMMONNAME. People reading a biology article will know quite well what food is, and the link is therefore surplus to requirement. I've mentioned this repeatedly in edit comments but as those seem to have been ignored, I'm letting you know here. I've undone several instances, by the way. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Don't revert. Ask for source. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was blocked for no reason! Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 14:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Autisticeditor 20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I got a shared block from an IP address and I can't do anything. I swear I did nothing wrong. Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 14:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using Wikipedia:Get my IP address. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 14:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Autisticeditor 20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have a shared block with 2601:2C5:847F:9FC0:0:0:0:0/64 and I didn't do anything wrong I swear!Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 14:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
Confirmed WP:LOUTSOCK to make disruptive edits. No comment as to the specific IP address range(s) involved. I will go and block this account directly. You need to fully account for your deliberate logging out to make disruptive edits. Denial won't work here. Yamla (talk) 14:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
