curprev05:2305:23, 22 September 2021 Mark83talkcontribs 9,709 bytes+45 Stating it’s a subsidiary is just a fact, it’s not giving credit. Given it was a subsidiary before, during and after development it’s relevant. And this is contrary to your approach on other articles, providing your disruptive WP:TENDENTIOUS editing. Undid revision 1045733905 by 103.210.146.65 (talk)undoTags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
curprev04:5204:52, 22 September 2021 103.210.146.65talk 9,664 bytes−46 Disruptive editing the drug is developed by the subsidiary But the editor is trying to give credit to parent company Which does not have role in its development.undoTags: Manual revertMobile editMobile web edit
curprev17:2917:29, 20 September 2021 103.210.146.65talk 9,663 bytes−30 Redundant because Genentech operates as an independent subsidiary of roche and the drug is developed by genetech .undoTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit