curprev13:0913:09, 27 August 2021 Citation bottalkcontribs 57,205 bytes+87 Alter: template type. Add: magazine, doi-access, s2cid. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Headbomb | Linked from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Academic_Journals/Journals_cited_by_Wikipedia/Sandbox | #UCB_webform_linked 901/958undo
curprev16:2316:23, 25 March 2021 Csmahlentalkcontribs 56,899 bytes+41 While Singer says that constructivism "searches for reasonable grounds" this in the article, he is describing a form of deontology, namely "Kantian constructivism". So the second part of this sentence that contrasts constructivism and deontology doesn't really make any sense. The original author may have meant "consequentialism" instead of "constructivism". See page 346 of "Ethics and Intuitions", the article cited.undoTag: Visual edit: Switched
curprev16:0216:02, 25 March 2021 Csmahlentalkcontribs 56,798 bytes+65 Previous author may have conflated two pieces of evidence: one where cognitive load (not necessarily a math problem) was given (decreasing consequentialist response) and one where a math problem was given to cast doubt on intuitions (increasing consequentialist response). I clarified the difference in this edit. See pg 704 of "Beyond Point and Shoot Morality".undoTag: Visual edit
curprev15:5215:52, 25 March 2021 Csmahlentalkcontribs 56,733 bytes0 This was inaccurate. On page 704 of the contributor's cited source (Beyond Point and Shoot Morality), Greene writes "Performing a distracting secondary task i.e., being under cognitive load reduces consequentialist* responses or slows consequentialist* responses, while having no effect on deontological* responses." Thus, cognitive load decreases consequentialist response, not vice versa. What the author wrote was in fact inconsistent with the dual process theory.undoTag: Visual edit