curprev22:5522:55, 13 March 2024 Seanrsontalkcontribs m23,005 bytes+2 →The voltmeter story: Original text is unclear if this is a direct quote. If it is, should leave as is, but still need to mention this correction somewhere: the phenomenon discussed here is truncation, not censoring. See the page of truncation: "Truncation is similar to but distinct from the concept of statistical censoring. A truncated sample can be thought of as being equivalent to an underlying sample with all values outside the bounds entirely omitted..."undoTags: RevertedVisual edit
curprev05:3205:32, 26 February 2023 GrayBorntalkcontribs 22,911 bytes+1,257 Effectively, I have added a paragraph indicating why Birnbaum rejected his own version of the conditionality principle and of the likelihood principle. It is important to give the article more information. His reasons for rejecting his 1962 argument coincide with why the frequentist school is not convinced that the likelihood principle should be followed. iundo
curprev19:2319:23, 29 June 2020 BenKMorleytalkcontribs m18,026 bytes+1 I changed "failures" to "successes" in the sentance "Adam, a scientist, conducted 12 trials and obtains 3 successes and 9 failures. One of those successes was the 12th and last observation. Then Adam left the lab." as this makes the sentence consistant with the Voltmeter story.undo
