curprev13:1513:15, 2 April 2024 Drbogdantalkcontribs 141,037 bytes+417 →Origins: add => <ref name="NYT-20240402">{{cite news |last=Smith |first=Tina |authorlink=Tina Smith |title=I Hope to Repeal an Arcane Law That Could Be Misused to Ban Abortion Nationwide |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/02/opinion/comstock-act-abortion-repeal.html |date=April 2, 2024 |work=The New York Times |url-status=live |archiveurl=https://archive.ph/PDUBs |archivedate=April 2, 2024 |accessdate=April 2, 2024 }}</ref>
curprev02:1102:11, 22 November 2023 Avatar317talkcontribs 140,847 bytes+875 Undid revision 1185808156 by Scorpions1325 (talk)Somewhat reverted good faith WP:GF edit. Salon's RSness is "no consensus - attribute" The entire source article is about Planned Parenthood, so the Bush administration's investigation is implied to be about PP clinics, (with no others mentioned) and the source states this explicitly as a demonstration that the behavior claimed to be found in the videos is not the norm.
19 November 2023
curprev03:3803:38, 19 November 2023 Scorpions1325talkcontribs 139,972 bytes−305 I have a lot of problems with this sentence: 1: WP:SALON.COM is not a reliable source. 2: The source does not say that the Bush administration ever investigated Planned Parenthood specifically. 3: The use of "however" in this context leads to an obvious case of WP:SYNTHESIS.