Contents

Room-temperature superconductor: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:51, 1 August 2023

Is it possible to make a material that is a superconductor at room temperature and atmospheric pressure?

Aroom-temperature superconductor is a material that is capable of exhibiting superconductivityatoperating temperatures above 0 °C (273 K; 32 °F), that is, temperatures that can be reached and easily maintained in an everyday environment.

As of 2020^[update], the material with the highest claimed superconducting temperature is an extremely pressurized carbonaceous sulfur hydride with a critical transition temperature of +15 °C at 267 GPa.^[1] On 22 September 2022, the original article reporting superconductivity in the carbonaceous sulfur hydride material was retracted by Nature journal editorial board due to a non standard, user-defined data analysis, calling into question the scientific validity of the claim.^[2][3]

Atatmospheric pressure the temperature record is still held by cuprates, which have demonstrated superconductivity at temperatures as high as 138 K (−135 °C).^[4]

Although researchers once doubted whether room-temperature superconductivity was actually achievable,^[5][6] superconductivity has repeatedly been discovered at temperatures that were previously unexpected or held to be impossible.

Claims of "near-room temperature" transient effects date from the early 1950s. Finding a room-temperature superconductor "would have enormous technological importance and, for example, help to solve the world's energy problems, provide for faster computers, allow for novel memory-storage devices, and enable ultra-sensitive sensors, among many other possibilities."^[6][7]

Reports

Since the discovery of high-temperature superconductors ("high" being temperatures above 77 K (−196.2 °C; −321.1 °F), the boiling point of liquid nitrogen), several materials have been reported to be room-temperature superconductors, although most of these reports have not been confirmed.^{[8][clarification needed]}

In 2000, while extracting electrons from diamond during ion implantation work, Johan Prins claimed to have observed a phenomenon that he explained as room-temperature superconductivity within a phase formed on the surface of oxygen-doped type IIa diamonds in a 10⁻⁶ mbar vacuum.^[9]

In 2003, a group of researchers published results on high-temperature superconductivity in palladium hydride (PdH_x: x>1)^[10] and an explanation in 2004.^[11] In 2007, the same group published results suggesting a superconducting transition temperature of 260 K.^[12] The superconducting critical temperature increases as the density of hydrogen inside the palladium lattice increases. This work has not been corroborated by other groups.

In 2012, an Advanced Materials article claimed superconducting behavior of graphite powder after treatment with pure water at temperatures as high as 300 K and above.^{[13][unreliable source?]} So far, the authors have not been able to demonstrate the occurrence of a clear Meissner phase and the vanishing of the material's resistance.

In 2014, an article published in Nature suggested that some materials, notably YBCO (yttrium barium copper oxide), could be made to superconduct at room temperature using infrared laser pulses.^[14]

In 2015, an article published in Nature by researchers of the Max Planck Institute suggested that under certain conditions such as extreme pressure H
₂S transitioned to a superconductive form H
₃S at 150 GPa (around 1.5 million times atmospheric pressure) in a diamond anvil cell.^[15] The critical temperature is 203 K (−70 °C) which would be the highest T_c ever recorded and their research suggests that other hydrogen compounds could superconduct at up to 260 K (−13 °C).^[16][17]

In 2018, Dev Kumar Thapa and Anshu Pandey from the Solid State and Structural Chemistry Unit of the Indian Institute of Science in Bangalore claimed the observation of superconductivity at ambient pressure and room temperature in films and pellets of a nanostructured material that is composed of silver particles embedded in a gold matrix.^[18] Due to similar noise patterns of supposedly independent plots and the publication's lack of peer review, the results have been called into question.^[19] Although the researchers validated their findings in a later paper in 2019,^[20] this claim is yet to be verified and confirmed.^{[citation needed]}

Also in 2018, researchers noted a possible superconducting phase at 260 K (−13 °C) in lanthanum decahydride (LaH
₁₀) at elevated (200 GPa) pressure.^[21] In 2019, the material with the highest accepted superconducting temperature was highly pressurized lanthanum decahydride, whose transition temperature is approximately 250 K (−23 °C).^[22][23]

In October 2020, room-temperature superconductivity at 288 K (at 15 °C) was reported in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride at very high pressure (267 GPa) triggered into crystallisation via green laser.^[24][25] The paper has been retracted in 2022 as doubts were raised concerning the statistical methods used by the authors to derive the result.^[26]

In March 2021, an announcement reported room-temperature superconductivity in a layered yttrium-palladium-hydron material at 262 K and a pressure of 187 GPa. Palladium may act as a hydrogen migration catalyst in the material.^[27]

In March 2023, superconductivity at a temperature of 294 K, and a pressure of 1 GPa, was reported in a nitrogen-doped lutetium hydride material.^[28] The claim has been met with some skepticism as it was made by the same researchers (see Ranga P. Dias) that made similar claims retracted by Nature in 2022^{[29][30][31][32][33]} and claimed observation of solid metallic hydrogen in 2016 as well as other allegations.^[34] Dense group IVa hydrides (as the new material) have been previously suggested could be superconductors at lower pressures than metallic hydrogen.^[35][36] First attempts to replicate the results of superconductivity in nitrogen-doped lutetium hydride have failed although the authors of the attempt recognize improvements could be made.^[37][38] Later attempts made by a different team using the original samples instead of newly prepared ones seem to confirm the reality of superconductivity in the Lu-N-H system.^[39][40]

On July 23, 2023, a Korean team from the Quantum Energy Research Center and Korean Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) posted a paper to the arXiv preprint server entitled "The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor", describing a novel RTSC they called LK-99.^[41] The paper was accompanied by a sister paper on arXiv,^[42] a paper in a Korean journal^[43] and a patent application.^[44] Multiple experts have expressed skepticism, with Oxford Materials Science Professor Susannah Speller stating that “it is too early to say that we have been presented with compelling evidence for superconductivity in these samples,” due to the lack of clear signatures of superconductivity, like magnetic field response and heat capacity. Other experts have expressed concerns that the data may be explained by "errors in the experimental procedure combined with imperfections in the LK-99 sample," and one scientist questioned the theoretical model used by the researchers.^[45]

Theories

Theoretical work by British physicist Neil Ashcroft predicted that solid metallic hydrogen at extremely high pressure (~500 GPa) should become superconducting at approximately room temperature because of its extremely high speed of sound and expected strong coupling between the conduction electrons and the lattice vibrations (phonons).^[46] This prediction is yet to be experimentally verified, as the pressure to achieve metallic hydrogen is unknown and may be on the order of 500 GPa.

A team at Harvard University has claimed to make metallic hydrogen and reports a pressure of 495 GPa.^[47] Though the exact critical temperature has not yet been determined, weak signs of a possible Meissner effect and changes in magnetic susceptibility at 250 K may have appeared in early magnetometer tests on the original now-lost sample and is being analyzed by the French team working with doughnut shapes rather than planar at the diamond culet tips.^[48]

In 1964, William A. Little proposed the possibility of high-temperature superconductivity in organic polymers.^[49] This proposal is based on the exciton-mediated electron pairing, as opposed to phonon-mediated pairing in BCS theory.

In 2004, Ashcroft returned to his idea and suggested that hydrogen-rich compounds can become metallic and superconducting at lower pressures than hydrogen. More specifically, he proposed a novel way to pre-compress hydrogen chemically by examining IVa hydrides.^[35]

In 2016, research suggested a link between palladium hydride containing small impurities of sulfur nanoparticles as a plausible explanation for the anomalous transient resistance drops seen during some experiments, and hydrogen absorption by cuprates was suggested in light of the 2015 results in H
₂S as a plausible explanation for transient resistance drops or "USO" noticed in the 1990s by Chu et al. during research after the discovery of YBCO.^{[citation needed][50]} It is also possible that if the bipolaron explanation is correct, a normally semiconducting material can transition under some conditions into a superconductor if a critical level of alternating spin coupling in a single plane within the lattice is exceeded; this may have been documented in very early experiments from 1986. The best analogy here would be anisotropic magnetoresistance, but in this case the outcome is a drop to zero rather than a decrease within a very narrow temperature range for the compounds tested similar to "re-entrant superconductivity".^{[citation needed]}

In 2018, support was found for electrons having anomalous 3/2 spin states in YPtBi.^[51] Though YPtBi is a relatively low temperature superconductor, this does suggest another approach to creating superconductors.

It was also discovered that many superconductors, including the cuprates and iron pnictides, have two or more competing mechanisms fighting for dominance (charge density wave)^{[citation needed]} and excitonic states so, as with organic light emitting diodes and other quantum systems, adding the right spin catalyst may by itself increase T_c. A possible candidate would be iridiumorgold placed in some of the adjacent molecules or as a thin surface layer so the correct mechanism then propagates throughout the entire lattice similar to a phase transition. As yet, this is speculative; some efforts have been made, notably adding leadtoBSCCO, which is well known to help promote high T_c phases by chemistry alone. However, relativistic effects similar to those found in lead-acid batteries might be responsible suggesting that a similar mechanism in mercury- or thallium-based cuprates may be possible using a related metal such as tin.

Any such catalyst would need to be nonreactive chemically but have properties that affect one mechanism but not the others, and also not interfere with subsequent annealing and oxygenation steps nor change the lattice resonances excessively. A possible workaround for the issues discussed would be to use strong electrostatic fields to hold the molecules in place during one of the steps until the lattice is formed.^{[original research?]}

Some research efforts are currently moving towards ternary superhydrides, where it has been predicted that Li
₂MgH
₁₆ (bilithium magnesium hexadecahydride) would have a T_c of 473 K (200 °C) at 250 GPa^[52][53] (much hotter than what is normally considered room temperature).

On the side of binary superhydrides, it has been predicted that ScH
₁₂ (scandium dodedecahydride) would exhibit superconductivity at room temperature – T_c between 333 K (60 °C) and 398 K (125 °C) – under a pressure expected not to exceed 100 GPa.^[54]

References