|
|
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
::@IP. You tell "I have no idea what this site is". This is not a valid reason for removal of sourced content. [[User:My very best wishes|My very best wishes]] ([[User talk:My very best wishes|talk]]) 20:42, 10 December 2015 (UTC) |
::@IP. You tell "I have no idea what this site is". This is not a valid reason for removal of sourced content. [[User:My very best wishes|My very best wishes]] ([[User talk:My very best wishes|talk]]) 20:42, 10 December 2015 (UTC) |
||
::: VM and MVBW: Maybe you Russians see things differently than us Westerners, but how can you expect the average Wikipedia reader to be able to read Russian/Ukrainian? A savvy reader will want to check the sources and, in this case, it will not be very easy to do, in fact it will be impossible for most of us. Can you lot not find reliable sources in English that state the same? It should not be hard if it is a known fact, now, should it? To find articles about the attacks in Paris I don't need to find some "Russian newspaper in Ukraine"... It is *everywhere*. No POV pushing, please. Cheers, and good luck with your search, --[[Special:Contributions/62.154.197.99|62.154.197.99]] ([[User talk:62.154.197.99|talk]]) 07:51, 11 December 2015 (UTC) |
::: VM and MVBW: Maybe you Russians see things differently than us Westerners, but how can you expect the average Wikipedia reader to be able to read Russian/Ukrainian? A savvy reader will want to check the sources and, in this case, it will not be very easy to do, in fact it will be impossible for most of us. Can you lot not find reliable sources in English that state the same? It should not be hard if it is a known fact, now, should it? To find articles about the attacks in Paris I don't need to find some "Russian newspaper in Ukraine"... It is *everywhere*. No POV pushing, please. Cheers, and good luck with your search, --[[Special:Contributions/62.154.197.99|62.154.197.99]] ([[User talk:62.154.197.99|talk]]) 07:51, 11 December 2015 (UTC) |
||
::::If you are in doubt, please use Google translator. There are lots of non-English references in in English WP. [[User:My very best wishes|My very best wishes]] ([[User talk:My very best wishes|talk]]) 17:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC) |
![]() | Russia Start‑class | |||||||||
|
![]() | Sociology Start‑class | |||||||||
|
There have been anti-government and pro-Euromaidan protests in Russia for a while now, let's have some context here. Charles Essie (talk) 21:00, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The infobox says that protests took place on 2 March and 15 March (i.e. only on two days), but they still claimed as ongoing in the lead. What reason? Seryo93 (talk) 12:26, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the move request was: no consensus. Jenks24 (talk) 12:10, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
2014 anti-war protests in Russia → 2014 Russian protests – These were not just anti-war protests. They were also anti-government and pro-Euromaidan. It says so in the infobox. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 19:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC) Charles Essie (talk) 01:08, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Re[1]. Ok, look, there's no requirement on English Wikipedia that the sources have to be in English. Yes, if possible, English sources are preferred, but that doesn't exclude non-English sources, any more than an academic publishing in an English journal is required to have a bibliography of English only references.
And the source in question is in fact reliable. If you think otherwise, take it up at WP:RSN. This here looks just like the standard POV WP:IJUSTDONTLIKEIT.User:Volunteer Marek 18:15, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]