This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
From the article: "It was enacted by the 'King-in-Parliament', that is, passed as an Act by the [[British House of Commons|House of Commons]] and House of Lords, before receiving the Royal Assent."
Is this true? I thought it was the 'King-in-Parliament-in-Dublin', i.e. the House of Commons of Southern Ireland (and I would guess the Senate). Why would Westminster have to discuss it, given that it was consistent with the Anglo-Irish Treaty? --Henrygb 00:34, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Irish Citizenship origin question?
I'm tring to find out when and where the legal concept of an Irish citizenship arose. Can anyone help? This is for the Irish nationality law article. Cheers. Seabhcán 14:44, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act, 1935? I recently found this document and it may be invaluable for general info and a bit of historic DOC Format. Djegan 17:58, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Constitutional Committee Image
I am considering uploading an image of the Constitutional Committee for inclusion in the Origins section of this site, but as a novice to editing on Wikipedia, am reluctant to apply such a dramatic change to a site at such an advanced stage.
Any feedback would be appreciated. RashersTierney (talk) 11:24, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply] Perhaps a dedicated section on the Constitutional Committee might be considered?
RashersTierney (talk) 15:01, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]