 | Min Mee-geum was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 5 June 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Jewel in the Palace. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 | Television C‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Korea C‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | Jewel in the Palace received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
I reworded the synopsis section for clarity. Made some corrections for grammar and spelling. Researched proper terms for different court titles, such as choigo sanggung for the highest female position in the royal kitchen. Added these terms to the synopsis, as there are no equivalents in English. 216.223.13.111 (talk) 23:19, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have read this article and proposed some improvement:
Is it OK? --Cheung1303 03:17, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
End moved discussion.
Dae Jang Geum seems to be a more correct transliteration of the show's name. Would you consider moving the page there?
Evidence:
The official usage is really not accepted by many people. I mean, the Chinese name for Seoul is now 首爾, but many people still call it 漢城 (Hanseong). I believe we should revert the title back to its original, and add the variations of the title into the name. O BTW, which channel aired this show in Chicago? --Arbiteroftruth 07:01, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
REPLY: The channel that aired the show in chicago is a cable channel known as AZN 9wikipedia has an article about it). However, AZN is also availible in other areas such as washington D.C. but it is mainly in the Chicago area. Dae Jang Geum aired on that channel in the summer of 2005.
Do we really need this kind of information? Even if it is verifiable, I fail to see its encyclopedic value. -- Visviva 13:23, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I corrected the commercial success section to indicate the ratings that it achieved in China, South Korea and Hong Kong. The rationale is that these information has more to do with commercial success than a listing of various version of the songs that was sang.
In fact, I will invite others to fill in what ratings it has achieved in Japan, Thailand and Philippines.
The paragraphs about songs should be moved to the Song section as it is not relevant to "commercial success". Ratings is something you will use to gauge success not songs.
Do you guys agree?
Apparently, the original author deleted my text and replaced it with the old one. Can we have a compromise here where you shift what you have to the song section and put in the statistical data in the "commercial success section".
I found out that the opening theme is part of the Track 2 in the soundtrack... but I don't know its title in Korean, only Chinese (苍龙) 202.156.6.54 12:10, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The opening theme is called Chang-Lyeon. 72.83.177.246 22:39, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I did some proofreading for this section and corrected grammatical errors and reworded some phrases for clarity. 216.223.13.111 (talk) 23:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Do we really need all of those lyrics? It really makes the page look more like fan cruft.
If no one objects, I will delete all the Lyrics, and the opening lines section.Arbiteroftruth 11:46, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that is if you can get the "fan" to agree. He/She keeps overturning what I've modified! Is there a way to include this into peer review or put this article under need for improvement?
Well, it appears that "fan" you have just mentioned isn't reverting the changes. This page is saved.
It means I have to go to the History section to see them again. Is it bloating the article? It does not look like fan craft to me... of course, the choice is yours. 202.156.6.54 13:28, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
101.156.6.54, you can go to other websites for that. Arbiteroftruth 00:34, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Somebody added the lyrics information again. I am hereby considering it vandalism and will be dealt with according to plans Arbiteroftruth 05:42, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that this article should be split into two different articles. One should focus solely on the historical Dae Jang Geum, and the other can focus on the TV series Dae Jang Geum. This one seems to focus too heavily on the Dae Jang Geum TV series rather than the actual person's history.
Take a look at the Hwang Jin-i article that I recently updated. I split it between the Hwang Jin-i TV series and the actual historical character because they are two distinctly different topics, despite being about the same person.
If there are no objections, I will go ahead and start writing an article on the historical Dae Jang Geum. Kindahypertonic 02:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
REPLY: There is already an article titled: Jang Geum, which is about the historical Jang Geum. Historically, we can not prove they called her Dae(which means great) Jang Geum so the article is simply called Jang Geum. In the case of Hwang Jin-I, her actual name was Hwang Jin-I so it is appropriate you split the article in such a manner. However, in the case of Dae Jang Geum, I think it is fine this way and there is a reference to the Jang Geum article in Dae Jang Geum. Also, the TV series Dae Jang Geum has had a near global impact on TV, it is currently even airing in Russia. This article obviously focuses on the TV series since historically, she wasn't titled Dae Jang Geum, that is only the name of the TV show. 72.83.177.246 22:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
MAY I KNOW THE CITATION OF THIS? AND HOW IS THAT RELIABLE? -- Lady Choi and Geum Young are exists in the actual history. Lady Choi was worser in actual than in the series. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcoelcpa (talk • contribs) 15:58, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
DJG is a story with a beginning, middle and an end, and it only runs for 54 episodes. It's not some surreal stream-of-consciousness improv act that continues to infinity. Nothing about the style or content of DJG suggests that it's a soap opera. The sets, locations, cinematography, music, acting, writing... none of it has anything to do with the soap opera genre. I'm going to remove 'soap opera' from the information box, and if someone reverts it they better have a damn good reason. 84.230.76.254 (talk) 11:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is very much so a soap opera, it's just not what modern American soap operas are. Modern soaps are inconclusive (though not necessarily stream-of-consciousness) and slow paced. Soap opera in this article is simple refering to a fictional, dramatic work on TV. It's not a wrong term, it's just not connotated with Western soap operas. (3 October 2008)
Maybe it seems quite strange to include western references to an asian drama, but i believe the link between the two characters of the series have something in common, and they are physicians. As far as i know, the main character on Jewel in the palace seems to have other abilities as well, like cooking, but i dont think so this is some kind of "barrier" or obstacle to forbade the inclusion of a short but helpful link to a similar drama, which had been popular like Jewel, except in america and in late 1990s. "One short final point. I think on nowadays world, wikipeans should avoid letting personal prejudices or intellectual snobbery or any kind of political or national chauvinism affect article edits." --HappyApple (talk) 04:39, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Loosely based on the historical figure during the reign of King Jungjong..." King Junjong reigned between 1506-1544, while the story of this woman starts somewhere from 1465, when her father left the royal court. She orphaned at the age of cca. 10 years, which means somewhere around 1470.Mazarin07 (talk) 21:43, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Dae Jang Geum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Dae Jang Geum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:05, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
