Contents

Talk:Socialist Unity Party of Germany: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:13, 11 April 2012

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Socialism Start‑class High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Germany: GDR Start‑class High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the GDR task force. This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. Once references have been added, remove the |unref= from this template. Politics Start‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Template:WikiProject Political parties

"Unified Socialist Party of Germany" vs. "Socialist Unity Party of Germany"

In my point of view is the tanslation of "Sozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands" with "Socialist Unity Party" misleading - "United Socialist Party" would be more appropriate...

Citius Altius Fortius 21:24, 04 Jul 2005 (CEST)

The term Einheitspartei can as well be considered in the way, that the party's will was to fight for a reunification, as in the way, that the Party is the united party of the socialist movement of Germany. --134.2.223.216 7 July 2005 02:10 (UTC)

Would someone please explain to me how "Unified Socialist Party" is the more correct English translation of Sozialistische Einheitspartei? Not only is "Socialist Unity Party" the literal translation from German into English, it also makes (at least to me) a lot more sense, since one of the main ideas the SED attempted to project was (through its name) the unity of German socialists - the Social Democrats (SPD) and the Communists (KPD) - following the years of disunity, turmoil and conflict during the Weimar Republic and the Third Reich. The KPD, by the way, began with a faction of former SPD members such as Karl Liebknecht, Rosa Luxemburg, etc.

Perhaps of greatest importance is that I cannot locate a single reference work that translated Sozialistische Einheitspartei into English as "Unified Socialist Party." However, there are plenty of references to "Socialist Unity Party," including official German government websites (example here) and in English-language publications published by the GDR government and the SED itself. I invite anyone reading this to provide me with an example to refute this.--Cvieg (talk) 20:01, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 January 2008, user:Portim edited this article using the phrasing "Unified Socialist Party" in place of "Socialist Unity Party." I posted a response (and request) on his talk page on 21 January 2008. As of this date, user:Portim has not responded to my post. I have therefore reverted his edit of this article to my previous edit (dated 13 January 2008). I repeat my invitation for anyone to provide me with a recognized example that uses the translation "Unified Socialist Party" if they wish to challenge the generally accepted translation of "Socialist Unity Party."--Cvieg (talk) 18:43, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The question is not which translation makes more sense but which is the usual translation in English-speaking countries. The "Einheit" in SED indeed means that it portrayed itself as a reunifaction of the two branches of German's labour parties that got separated in 1917. Hence the handshake symbol. Hence, "Unified Socialist Party" makes more sense, as it is "Einheitspartei" not "Partei der Sozialistischen Einheit". However, as I said, what English speakers use is what counts. Deposuit (talk) 14:13, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh. That image is ever so slightly (well, about 10 times) too large. -- Morwen.

Fixed - reduced from 1436px wide to 300px (on the page) and 750 px (larger version). --rbrwr

Shouldn't this article be merged into Left Party (Germany)? If PDS was the direct legal succession of SED, then there should only be one article for the entire history of the party. --Soman 01:31, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The PDS is the successor of the SED in the end. This article is about the party that ruled alone, so I think there is no need for a merger --SoWhy 19:03, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To merge is out of the question I think. the PDS article would be overwieghted without a reason.--Constanz - Talk 10:48, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SEDIIIparteitag.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Idol-sed.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

is there a reason this is not mentioned at all in here? After all, this party is responsible for it.

I can read the following in the paragraph talking about the 11th congress:

The eleventh Congress, held 17–21 April 1986 and lasted until June 5, 1999, unequivocally endorsed the SED and Honecker, whom it confirmed for another term as party head.

What does that mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.165.22.67 (talk) 22:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox says the party was dissolved in 1990.

Was it really ever dissolved? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anuclanus (talk • contribs) 13:08, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No. It was renamed in 1990. In recent years it merged with another group but in 1990 it was merely renamed. Deposuit (talk) 14:09, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]