curprev11:1911:19, 11 June 2024 Wikaintalkcontribs 249,179 bytes+2,915 Merged two good faith edits. The later edits intended to kept the idea but deleted a significant amount of citations.undo
curprev17:4317:43, 16 May 2024 86.7.255.103talk 246,278 bytes+34 →Pandora Papers (2021): statements like these are "adopted" by a legislature but does not necessarily constitute an opinion of the European Union as a whole. They often include the statements of opposition parties.undo
curprev03:1203:12, 7 July 2023 CaribDigitatalkcontribs m250,325 bytes+25 foreign --> non-domiciled. Someone could be from the same country, but use another part of that jurisdiction to get a lower rate because they're not regularly domiciled there-in.undo
curprev18:1818:18, 28 September 2021 46.7.85.200talk 243,987 bytes−1,975 Undid revision 1046897075 by Reluctant Jedi (talk); rm, lot of POV here (labeling of notable tax academics as "tax activists"); having looked at other edits by this author on tax articles, they should probably not be editing in this areaundoTag: Undo
curprev14:2914:29, 11 July 2021 173.241.105.152talk 243,942 bytes−11 Revised "Caymans" to "Cayman Islands," and removed false implication that Bermuda is in the Caribbean Sea.undoTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
curprev14:4214:42, 18 December 2019 Financefactztalkcontribs 242,834 bytes−31 Undid revision 931369042 by Britishfinance (talk) - I am making the edit in good faith on the basis of over emphasis of an article you have created and edited. I have at no point personally attached you although I believe the edits you have made or heavily biased in the extreme. I am happy to have a moderator review this but I am not sure how this can be done. I cannot see why your opinion takes precedence over mine.undoTag: Undo
curprev14:1814:18, 18 December 2019 Britishfinancetalkcontribs 242,865 bytes+31 Undid revision 931368183 by Financefactz (talk; please do not make Personal Attacks against me (as you have done in other edit summaries), also, do not edit war or you may be blocked from editing. I am happy to discuss this on the Talk Page of this article. Thanks. BF.undoTag: Undo
curprev14:1114:11, 18 December 2019 Financefactztalkcontribs 242,834 bytes−31 Undid revision 931366249 by Britishfinance (talk) - it has 5 other links already including (see Leprechaun economics) and (called leprechaun economics) both linked to the article you have largely created and a term created by an individual who has publicly praised your account. How can you possibly claim that you are in anyway impartial on this matter.undoTag: Undo
curprev10:3510:35, 10 November 2019 2600:1017:b110:ff20:7445:73f8:319:e644talk 242,273 bytes+35 The previous editor had written "and that Is why accusations that the US is a tax haven are not credible" which is not at all a neutral point of view There's even a Wikipedia on the specific topic of the discussion around "The United States as a Tax Haven" . On a factual level, it can clearly be seen that the US has many territories, PR, the USVI, and American Samoa are all considered to be tax havens by the EU. This is not an opinion, but a conclusion anyone could make from the direct evidence.undoTags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
