 | |
| Wikipedia ads | file info – #291 |
 |
|
 | This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
I need to get an admin review for the false accusations for sockpuppetry. I didn't knew why and how some one can accuse for something trivial? SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 18:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
|
Hey 48JCL, thank you so much for doing the GA review for my article npm left-pad incident! I appreciate the feedback about sourcing and I'll be sure to keep it in mind for the future. Have a good one! ~Liancetalk 21:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello there, I saw you've completed two reviews (Npm left-pad incident and Kiribati at the 2020 Summer Olympics) since my last message. I just wanted to check that you didn't just check the sources in those reviews, and that you also took a look at the prose, the layout, and the other bits of the GA criteria? If you did, it's good practice to just say so in the review. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).
Administrator changes
Bureaucrat changes
Oversight changes
Dreamy Jazz
Guideline and policy news
Technical news
Arbitration
Miscellaneous
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge
-- 02:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge
-- 02:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
I saw your signature at this AfD, which has gotten pretty heated, and thought – did they really tag this guy's !vote with citation needed and dubious? That would be a whole new level of badgering! Thankfully, it was just your signature, which gave me a good laugh. Toadspike [Talk] 08:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per this discussion, it appears I was wrong about that redirect from the old user talk page. I've now deleted it, sorry for the hassle. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why are you welcoming editors who haven't edited in years? -- Ponyobons mots 20:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I appreciate that you're trying to get into reviewing, but I was hoping that you could return Talk:Fear of bees/GA1 and Talk:Autocracy/GA3 so more experienced reviewers can address them. I'd also prefer if you didn't appoint yourself the source reviewer of my other nomination Talk:Federalist No. 8/GA1 despite the actual reviewer not accepting your offer to share the review. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Relativity ⚡️ 22:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Category:Gaborone task force articles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 16:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Gaborone task force has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Queen of Hearts (🏳️⚧️ • 🏳️🌈) 22:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking the time out of your day to review Slowpoke (Pokémon), both of us nominators appreciate it. However, are a bit confused about the lack of overall comments on the article. While we're glad our prose is apparently up to par, in my case I find it a bit odd that there were apparently no comments to be made about anything in the body bar the citations checked for the spotcheck, as well as an additional lack of comments about how we passed things such as the manual of style and overall. Additionally, your source check seems to only be checking about verifying the lead, whereas most reviews focus on verifying not only the lead, but also the rest of the body of the article. If it's not too much effort, would you be willing to leave additional comments or overall summaries of these areas in order to explain your rationale? While it may or may not affect your overall review, we do just want to ensure the review was conducted while complying with the usual Good Article review standards. We hope it isn't too much trouble. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:CaseOh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 03:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
