→Purpose: rpl
|
|
||
Line 241: | Line 241: | ||
What is the purpose? Authors can just add it manually. - [[User:Patricknoddy|'''Patricknoddy''']]<font color="#000000">[[User talk:Patricknoddy|<sup style="font-variant: small-caps;">'''TALK''' (reply here)</sup>]]</font><font color="#000000"><sup style="font-variant: small-caps;">|</sup></font><font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Patricknoddy|<sup style="font-variant: small-caps;">'''HISTORY'''</sup>]]</font> 19:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC) |
What is the purpose? Authors can just add it manually. - [[User:Patricknoddy|'''Patricknoddy''']]<font color="#000000">[[User talk:Patricknoddy|<sup style="font-variant: small-caps;">'''TALK''' (reply here)</sup>]]</font><font color="#000000"><sup style="font-variant: small-caps;">|</sup></font><font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Patricknoddy|<sup style="font-variant: small-caps;">'''HISTORY'''</sup>]]</font> 19:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
|
:Quite a number of articles are written by newbees, some by hoaxers, vandals and spammers. They need review by people who have a clue in the subject. Many articles written in the framework of one project (e.g. Project:Russia) might represent significant interest for the other projects. Usually, an ability to monitor and review articles related to a project (or portal) is an asset. All the bot does is producing and archiving some lists. You can transclude it somewhere or just ignore it if you wish [[User:Alex Bakharev|Alex Bakharev]] 00:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
::Well, maybe a member of the project could find it and add it (or delete it). - [[User:Patricknoddy|'''Patricknoddy''']]<font color="#000000">[[User talk:Patricknoddy|<sup style="font-variant: small-caps;">'''TALK''' (reply here)</sup>]]</font><font color="#000000"><sup style="font-variant: small-caps;">|</sup></font><font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Patricknoddy|<sup style="font-variant: small-caps;">'''HISTORY'''</sup>]]</font> 11:00, 19 May 2007 (UTC) |
Thank you for experimenting with the page User:AlexNewArtBot/BadLog on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. P.B. Pilhet / Talk 21:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please take a few moments and fill in the data for your bot on Wikipedia:Bots/Status Thank you Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 18:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
May be I am not able to understand your suggestions well.
I will be obliged if you help me put the matter in the page of Kriya Reiki as well as Vishitao Reiki in the way that is acceptable to the site.
Can you suggest more specifically what needs to be added and what needs to be changed?
Rekhaa Kale 17:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As a result of discussion on the village pump and mailing list, bots are now allowed to edit up to 15 times per minute. The following is the new text regarding bot edit rates from Wikipedia:Bot Policy:
Until new bots are accepted they should wait 30-60 seconds between edits, so as to not clog the recent changes list and user watchlists. After being accepted and a bureaucrat has marked them as a bot, they can edit at a much faster pace. Bots doing non-urgent tasks should edit approximately once every ten seconds, while bots who would benefit from faster editing may edit approximately once every every four seconds.
Also, to eliminate the need to spam the bot talk pages, please add Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard to your watchlist. Future messages which affect bot owners will be posted there. Thank you. --Mets501 00:00, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I'm not sure if User:AlexNewArtBot/Sweden grabs the keyword "Swedish", but if it doesn't, could you add it? Great bot idea, great bot! Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 23:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
I need to setup you to find and list the new pages related to Karnataka. I have put in the announcement tag in that page. Not sure what next? The initial set of Keywords include, Karnataka, Kannada, Kannadigas, Kannadiga, Kannadati, Category:Karnataka, Category:Kannada poets, Category:Kannada writers, Bengalooru, Bangalore, Mysuru, Mysore, Mangalore, Tumkur, Hubli, Dharwad, Belgaum, Rajkumar, Sahitya, Saahitya, Vachana.
The new pages need to be listed here: Portal:Karnataka/New Pages.
Please let me know if you need further information on this request. Thank you! - KNM Talk 09:51, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This bot can used another languages wikipedia? like zh wikipedia--Shizhao 15:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Have you considered adding User:Lupin/badwordstoUser:AlexNewArtBot/Bad? Just a suggestion. Happy editing -- Chris 73 | Talk 09:43, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You might also try and see if the ratio of content:external links is disproportionate; it will reveal articles that are nothing but linkspam creations. JoeSmack Talk 12:14, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Could you please make a bot for the Netherlands? Here is some tentative keywords. ij (i+j) and ij (single letter) are both included. Colchicum 20:58, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Colchicum 23:43, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Colchicum 04:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This bot is a great idea! It is also a pretty much canonical example of the application of a Naive Bayes classifier, so we should be able to use mathematical principles to automatically generate pattern lists for categories, based on sampling word lists from already-categorized articles. -- The Anome 13:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pasted to User:AlexNewArtBot/Czech Alex Bakharev 12:28, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Colchicum 23:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Could You feed new articles related to literature, books, novels, authors etc. Thanks, feydey 13:45, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The google search actually has 840 results, NOT 1-10. Miaers 01:08, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Colchicum 15:51, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Alex. Your bot added unref/uncat tags to a redirect. That seems a bit odd. Can you have a look? Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Look at eg. [1] (I can't wikilink that, since the title gets translated to a real article title, Mallee Football League 2007 "B" Grade season). That's the second article your bot has created with nothing but a speedy deletion tag. The first one replaced a page that had just been deleted (Jeff Merchant), but I don't know what happened here. - Bobet 14:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
...until the bot stops creating empty articles that it then requests deletion for [2] - CSD is already backlogged 90% of the time without robotic help!
Shout me when the problem is solved and I'll happily unblock (as can anyone else when the problem is solved, of course).
Thanks Alex, and sorry to come down heavy on your bot. RΞDVΞRS ✖ ЯΞVΞЯSΞ 21:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am working on the Wikification Project, and noticed that AlexNewArtBot is tagging articles with the cleanup tags at the bottom of the article. As per WP:TC, the tags normally are placed at the top of the article. Regards. -- Whpq 19:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your bot tagged the List of people named Giselle with the {{unreferenced}} tag. The article is just a list of Wikipedia articles who share the same name, and doesn't make any other assertions. Do these types of articles need to be referenced? - Mtmelendez (TALK|UB|HOME) 12:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have come across several article tagged by your bot recently, and while I applaud the tagging, I wonder if it would be possible to add dates to the tags, as Alaibot does. This would at least save SmackBot from coming along later and filling in the gaps. To clarify, instead of adding {{unreferenced}}, you should probably add {{unreferenced|date={{{CURRENTMONTH}}} {{{CURRENTYEAR}}}}}. --Stemonitis 17:02, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The automated addition of {{stub}} seems to be a bit problematic, it just means that someone else needs to go through again afterwards and correct every stub template that it adds. Any chance on improving or disabling this feature? --NigelJ talk 10:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed you have marked three of my contributions as "unreferenced" when all three of the items make reference to a book. For what references are you looking? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dma124 (talk • contribs)
The bot creates cleanup messages for articles that get speedy deleted, eg Talk:Kenneth fitzsimons. Could the bot be smarter? Perhaps wait 2 weeks after article creation so the article gets speedy deleted and the bot doesn't create an unnecessary talk page.--Commander Keane 06:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello AxelBot/AxelNewArtBot. I wrote the Catharose de Petri, Lectorium Rosicrucianum and Jan van Rijckenborgh articles. How can I clean them up? I can't find any evidence of what the Bot has found a problem with on any of them. I'm a bit worried about this Bot, to be honest. Don't like the idea that its roaming around the Wikipedia deleting articles.... Please adviseThePeg 22:19, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Axel. ThePeg 09:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
there was an ((unreferenced)) tag on the article List of Deemed Universities. ummm... it's a list. and all articles which the page links to mention it... does this need further references? or should i revert? thanks, joseph 14:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This bot insists in adding a film-stub tag to this article, even though the "film" mentioned in the article is not about movies. How to stop this behavior? --maf 17:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The bot tagged Lists of nutrition topics as needing references. Do we really need to have a reference to prove that each food list is a nutritional topic list? Lists of mathematics topics doesn't have any references, and it is a featured list. The bot is cluttering up Wikipedia with useless tags. I work on a lot on lists, and it is getting to be a pain to clean up after this bot. Please remove lists from among the pages its works on. Thank you. The Transhumanist (AWB) 06:41, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Tetracontakaihenagon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —David Eppstein 03:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you get this message can you possibly put the list on our project subpage as indicated and not on the main page where it adds clutter. Thanks. - Kleinzach 02:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to have had to block the bot, but it seems to be running the NP Patrol task, for which trials were specifically discontinued on the BRFA page, for the time being at least. I'm happy for the bot to be unblocked with your assurance that the bot won't be found editing without approval/trial status in future. Thanks, Martinp23 16:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How does one handle working in conjunction with this bot? Is it like this?
-Ravedave 16:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This gallery has just had a banner put on it to say that it doesn't cite references.
It doesn't need to cite references. There is nothing in the gallery that is of a nature to be queried. It is merely a group of paintings with titles under them. It is an adjunct to an article which discusses the paintings and which cites its sources. Would you kindly remove the unnecessary clutter.
--Amandajm 10:08, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Don't bother. I've added the names of two books and deleted the tag.--Amandajm 10:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can you tell/show me how to put an entry I created Steelyard Blues into the category films please? I thought I had done this but it seems I got it wrong. Thanking you. SmokeyTheCat 15:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Most people working on the uncategorized backlog prefer the uncat tags to be placed at the bottom of the article. This has a number of advantages and that's also what all the other bots are doing so it would be nice if this bot can be tweaked to follow that pattern. Thanks, Pascal.Tesson 16:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Golden Unicorn, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Red Baron 17:14, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I want to use your bot to automatically update Wikipedia:Scottish Wikipedians' notice board/New articles, but I have to admit that I cannot make head nor tail of the instructions. I may try to do it anyway, but I just wondered if I could simply 'steal' the code of another similar WikiProject. Any suggestions for one that works well? Ta. --Mais oui! 09:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I blocked [3], I presume this bot after it was reported to WP:AIV. It appears you might not have logged in. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any way to limit the list size? Max Naylor 10:07, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What is the purpose? Authors can just add it manually. - PatricknoddyTALK (reply here)|HISTORY 19:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]