|
| |||||||
|
|||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
|
Thanks for creating Liu Xucang, CWH!
Wikipedia editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank-you!
To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Thanks for creating Zhang Renjie, CWH!
Wikipedia editor Fiachra10003 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank you. A very interesting article.
To reply, leave a comment on Fiachra10003's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Thanks for creating Li Shizeng, CWH!
Wikipedia editor Fiachra10003 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Very interesting article
To reply, leave a comment on Fiachra10003's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Thanks for creating Gansu Flying Horse, CWH!
Wikipedia editor Jbhunley just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Good to see articles on unique works of art. Good job.
To reply, leave a comment on Jbhunley's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of foreign political events with the interference of Communist Party of China is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of foreign political events with the interference of Communist Party of China until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
An incident on your talk page that does not affect you has been mentioned at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. This is not any sort of sanction or threat of sanction or any other action toward you, it is only standard procedure to mention anyone who has even the remotest connection to incidents mention at WP:ANI. You are free to remain uninvolved by not commenting. Ian.thomson (talk)
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi CWH!
I'm the editor-in-chief of the WikiJournal of the Humanities.
Given your experience with Wikipedia and understanding of academia, I'm emailing to ask whether you might be interested in getting involved as an editor for the WikiJournal of Humanities. It's modelled on the successful Wikipedia-integrated journals, the WikiJournal of Medicine, and the WikiJournal of Science. Our editorial board covers a range of fields and expertise, aiming to cover disciplines across the humanities, arts, and social sciences.
Our approach combines the rigour of academic peer review with the extensive reach of an encyclopedia. Consequently, it is an excellent way to achieve public engagement and outreach while impacting public understanding of complex scholarly topics. Articles undergo peer review and are subsequently published in both standard academic PDF format and directly onto Wikipedia, often getting over 100,000 views annually. This enhances the encyclopedia's scientific and factual accuracy and offers academics citable, indexed publications. Moreover, it enables significantly broader dissemination compared to traditional scholarly publishing methods.
The time commitment is flexible. An editor would generally dedicate 2-10 hours per month to a range of activities.
Please let me know if this aligns with your interests, or if you'd like to know more.
Your experience and expertise would be highly appreciated. Fransplace... Let's talk 23:09, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
