|
|
→Contents: comment on Chris Hull
|
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
To be continued |
To be continued |
||
== Chris Hull (physicist) == |
|||
Arshan, it is recommended by [[Wikipedia:Stubs]] that stub tags go at the bottom of an article, so I am moving the tag you placed [[Chris Hull (physicist) | here]]. --[[User:Merond e/Userboxes|<font color="orange">'''M'''</font>]][[User talk:Merond e|<font color="purple">'''e'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Merond e|<font color="green">'''r'''</font>]][[User:Merond e|o]]nd [[User:Merond e|e]] 21:38, 4 April 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Feel free to post your feedbacks.Arshan abbas 08:12, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Great Mosque of Cordoba has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. EdBever (talk) 18:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Timeline of antisemitism. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. dougweller (talk) 19:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I would be happy to adopt you! In future, if you have any problems, questions or anything you are wondering about, please leave a message for me on my adoption sub-page and I will get back to you as soon as possible.
Just some notes about your message: when posting on talk pages, please start a new section at the bottom of the page. You can do this automatically by clicking the "New Section" tab at the top of the page. Also, please sign your posts with four tildes - ~~~~ - to automatically generate a signature and timestamp which will link back to your user page. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 10:32, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Jamia Live requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}tothe top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. BelovedFreak 16:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have left a new message for you at User:Strdst grl/adoption. This is the last time I will leave a note here, so please watch the page from now on. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 10:03, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
To be continued
Arshan, it is recommended by Wikipedia:Stubs that stub tags go at the bottom of an article, so I am moving the tag you placed here. --Merond e 21:38, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
